eadache... :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Razvan
> > >
> >
> > What's wrong with apache?
> >
> >
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Rotaru Razvan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:58:05 -0800 (PST)
> From: Rotaru Razvan <[EMAIL
thttpd, works great, non forking, php can be compiled in
it is in the ports, lots of info on the website:
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/
Still being actively developed/maintained. Some very large sites use
it esp. for pictures, for which it seems to be super fast in
comparison with apache.
: "Rotaru Razvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Bleichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Re: looking for a lightweight web server
> Well apache isn't quite lightweight. I was hopi
Well apache isn't quite lightweight. I was hoping to find something
small, that eats as few recources as possible. I don't need cgi
support, perl and other stuff like that. Only html+php.
It's not like i don't like apache. I just think it's not suited for my
kind of application.
If you still think
