> > why are you not using your ISP to relay emails, using its mail
> > gateway (which should have a static IP address)?
...
> I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including
> most european ones) now have the right to access all emails
> that pass through an ISP's server. They do no
David Southwell wrote:
I pay for my connection to receive.. and pay for my connection to send. Some people just want to not paly their part in absorbing the risks that go with participation. It is up to us to defend our systems.
Your server, your rules. You can whitelist or blacklist anyone
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:35:14 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree and they do BUT they need a warrant to do so!! That is the
> safeguard.
>
> With the internet no warrant is needed. There is no protection for
> civil liberties as applies with pohysical mail.
First of all, th
On Monday 08 September 2008 05:09:03 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:21:03 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > If the same protocol was applied to physical mail then we would not
> > have been allowed to send letters unless we had a big building to send
> > it fr
On Monday 08 September 2008 05:03:30 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > In yesterday's world anyone could send a physical letter to any address
> > anywhere in the world. I get spam letters through the letter box it is up
> > to me to chuck them in the bin. Why should the internet be di
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:21:03 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the same protocol was applied to physical mail then we would not
> have been allowed to send letters unless we had a big building to send
> it from and all letters would have had to have had a "big building"
> sendin
David Southwell:
In yesterday's world anyone could send a physical letter to any address
anywhere in the world. I get spam letters through the letter box it is up to
me to chuck them in the bin. Why should the internet be different especially
when the restrictions on fixed IPs are brought abo
On Monday 08 September 2008 04:47:49 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:33:14 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >On Monday 08 September 2008 03:57:11 you wrote:
> >>On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >>> Could anyone tel
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:33:14 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday 08 September 2008 03:57:11 you wrote:
>>On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration
>>> files to boun
On Monday 08 September 2008 04:19:11 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including most
> > european ones) now have the right to access all emails that pass through
> > an ISP's
>
> only if you use big operators.
All UK operators are "big operators and
I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including most european
ones) now have the right to access all emails that pass through an ISP's
only if you use big operators.
BIG BROTHER is watching far too much. Frankly I am surprised that
we have democracy. in democracy majority de
On Monday 08 September 2008 04:10:11 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry to ask the question here but postfix users mailing list is
> > currently rejecting mails from servers on a dynamic ip address
> > - so I cannot get through to ask a question there.
>
> In
On Monday 08 September 2008 03:38:05 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix
> > configuration files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > that emanate from a source outside my local network.
>
> After
On Monday 08 September 2008 03:57:11 you wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration
> > files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that emanate from a
> > sour
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to ask the question here but postfix users mailing list is
> currently rejecting mails from servers on a dynamic ip address
> - so I cannot get through to ask a question there.
Incidentally, your IP is also listed on several RBLs.
--
Sahil Ta
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration
> files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that emanate from a
> source outside my local network.
>
> Sorry to ask the question he
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix
> configuration files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> that emanate from a source outside my local network.
After permitting your networks in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions, us
17 matches
Mail list logo
