Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-02 Thread Colin Percival
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? > > ./port.sh > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done. > Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. > No updates needed. > Ports tree

Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Scott I. Remick wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just hop

Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Eric Crist
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:43 AMOct 1, 2007, Scott I. Remick wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wro

Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the > last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. > Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just hopped on here to check