On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list,
because people are not required to subscribe to post.
That makes sense and does explain
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
> > Please Cc responses to the mailing list
>
> I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing
> lists nowadays it's common to reply to
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list,
> because people are not required to subscribe to post.
That makes sense and does explain why my last mail came through the
list
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Please Cc responses to the mailing list
Actually, I had written that in a reply.
I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing
lists nowadays it's comm
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
> Please Cc responses to the mailing list
I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing
lists nowadays it's common to reply to the list only. Most MUA nowadays
provide an option to automatically repl
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Dear Mr. Block, Greetings. Thank you for your response to my message.
Your instruction to change the name of the disk drive from ah0 to aha0
worked. I can now boot FreeBSD. The next trick will be to attempt t
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good evening, Free BSD enthusiasts. Thank you to each of the several
people who have responded to my previous messages. I have made
significant progress, but am now flummoxed at the installation of the
boot loader. The handbook sa
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
wrote:
> Good evening, Free BSD enthusiasts. Thank you to each of the several
good morning,
> people who have responded to my previous messages. I have made
> significant progress, but am now flummoxed at the installation of the
this is good to
Good evening, Free BSD enthusiasts. Thank you to each of the several people
who have responded to my previous messages. I have made significant progress,
but am now flummoxed at the installation of the boot loader. The handbook says
to run this command, "boot0cfg -B ad0". When I run this com
Lee,
Are you using DOS-style or GPT partitions? I'm assuming DOS-style,
and the rest of this email is only correct if that's the case, so
correct me if I'm wrong.
There's actually two partition tables at work here -- the "big" one,
that lives at the start of the physical disk and divides up the
F
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am attempting to install FreeBSD 9.1 on
a dual-boot configuration with Windows XP. I am using bsdinstall. I do not
wish for the partition table to be changed. How do I instruct bsdinstall to
skip the re-partitioning step? It gives an error message
at 5:14 AM,
wrote:
> Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am attempting to install FreeBSD 9.1
> on a dual-boot configuration with Windows XP. I am using bsdinstall. I do
> not wish for the partition table to be changed. How do I instruct bsdinstall
> to skip the re-partition
On Mar 15, 2013 12:48 AM, wrote:
>
> Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am attempting to install FreeBSD
9.1 on a dual-boot configuration with Windows XP. I am using bsdinstall.
I do not wish for the partition table to be changed. How do I instruct
bsdinstall to skip the re-partit
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am attempting to install FreeBSD 9.1 on
a dual-boot configuration with Windows XP. I am using bsdinstall. I do not
wish for the partition table to be changed. How do I instruct bsdinstall to
skip the re-partitioning step? It gives an error message
Several trials failed, but perhaps the kind of issues do lead to the
cause. I'll describe one trial.
Power on -> Enter to boot -> Shell -> # sysinstall -> Standard ->
set up MBR partition -> ada0 -> keep geometry: yes ->
OffsetSize(ST) EndName PType DescSubtype Flags
0
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:05:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I startet the FreeBSD installer, chose the shell and then run:
# mount -t ufs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
# cd /mnt
# rm -r *
# rm -r .*
That worked? I can hardly understand why /dev/ad0s1 is
mountable (except
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 02:17 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:05:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > ada0 298 GB MBR
> > ada0s1 57 GB freebsd
> > ada0s2 240 GB EBR
> > [snip]
> >
> > gpart show also doesn't display the 3 ufs and the swap any more.
>
> Did it previously show them
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:05:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I startet the FreeBSD installer, chose the shell and then run:
>
> # mount -t ufs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
> # cd /mnt
> # rm -r *
> # rm -r .*
That worked? I can hardly understand why /dev/ad0s1 is
mountable (except it's /dev/ad0s1c, i. e. you've
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:33:16 -0400, Warren Block
wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote:
I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say.
The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs
and another which is on an mbr partition.
from "Lynn Steven Killingsworth" :
> I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say.
> The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs and
> another which is on an mbr partition. I thought I would format the mbr
> disk with zfs and move everything from the
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote:
I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say.
The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs and
another which is on an mbr partition. I thought I would format the mbr disk
with zfs and move ever
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Robert Simmons wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Warren Block wrote:
There's a sample in the second half of my disk setup article:
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html
Looks good. I have a few critiques:
1) Linux and FreeBSD do not have alignme
On 5/6/11 7:03 AM, Robert Simmons wrote:
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:40:22 AM Matthias Apitz wrote:
# gpart create -s mbr ad4 # Init the disk with an MBR
# gpart add -t freebsd ad4# Create a BSD container
# gpart create -s bsd ad4s1 # Init with a BSD
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:35 AM, wrote:
> Robert Simmons wrote:>
>> > How do I wipe the whole thing in one go so that I can start
>> > afresh?
>> >
>> > gpart destroy ad4 ??
>>
>> Yes, but first you must delete all of the slices/partitions.
>> Think of it this way: you must go backwards down the
Robert Simmons wrote:
> > How do I wipe the whole thing in one go so that I can start
> > afresh?
> >
> > gpart destroy ad4 ??
>
> Yes, but first you must delete all of the slices/partitions.
> Think of it this way: you must go backwards down the path you
> just came with a delete for each add, t
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 08:03, Robert Simmons wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:40:22 AM Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> > Since some time I'm as well using gpart(8) to setup new systems with the
>> > following sequence:
>> >
>> > # gpart c
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 08:03, Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:40:22 AM Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > Since some time I'm as well using gpart(8) to setup new systems with the
> > following sequence:
> >
> > # gpart create -s mbr ad4 # Init the disk with an MBR
> > #
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:59:44 AM Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 06:40:22 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > Since some time I'm as well using gpart(8) to setup new systems with the
> > following sequence:
> >
> > # gpart create -s mbr ad4 # Init the disk with an MBR
> >
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:40:22 AM Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Since some time I'm as well using gpart(8) to setup new systems with the
> following sequence:
>
> # gpart create -s mbr ad4 # Init the disk with an MBR
> # gpart add -t freebsd ad4# Create a BSD container
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 06:40:22 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Since some time I'm as well using gpart(8) to setup new systems with the
> following sequence:
>
> # gpart create -s mbr ad4 # Init the disk with an MBR
> # gpart add -t freebsd ad4# Create a BSD container
El día Saturday, June 04, 2011 a las 08:43:37PM -0600, Warren Block escribió:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Robert Simmons wrote:
>
> >> Do I need kernel modules not in the generic kernel or create extra boot
> >> partition?
> >
> > If you use it to make GPT partitions, you will need a freebsd-boot
> > p
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> There's a sample in the second half of my disk setup article:
>
> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html
Looks good. I have a few critiques:
1) Linux and FreeBSD do not have alignment requirements, as far as I
know. So you
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Robert Simmons wrote:
Do I need kernel modules not in the generic kernel or create extra boot
partition?
If you use it to make GPT partitions, you will need a freebsd-boot
partition with the proper bootcode for what you want to do. If you
search this mailing list's archive
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
> I just realized how many years ago I haven't been partitioning any disks ..
> this system is so stable :) So, now I see I have gpart as alternative to
> fdisk/bsdlabel.
gpart(8) from my experience is far superior to all the older tools.
>
>
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
> - or any problems (problems as in I've never tried that before) - using
> gpart instead of the "old" scheme?
Sorry for the double post, but the only problem that I've encountered
is after creating a encrypted provider with geli(8), that provi
Some points - I've done most of these...
1. Grub can boot from a secondary partition (my current laptop has a
recovery partition in 1, vista (b) in 2, fbsd in 3, and linux in 4
as 2 secondary partitions.) works fine. Grub doesn't boot vista
correctly, but handles bsd fine and (of course)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:30:43 -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:45:07AM -0700, Michael David Crawford wrote:
> > FreeBSD is not happy with MS 'extended partitions'. But, I don't really
> > see your problem.
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:30:43 -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:45:07AM -0700, Michael David Crawford wrote:
> FreeBSD is not happy with MS 'extended partitions'. But, I don't really
> see your problem. You are not using Microsloth for anything.
That's why I'm not sur
ill...@gmail.com skrev:
2009/4/26 Jorg Andersson :
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:45:33PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
I don't recall FreeBSD supporting extended partitions... at all
I remember reading they aren't in /dev/ but still is mountable. Is this
still the case?
They show up just fine here (8-
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:45:07AM -0700, Michael David Crawford wrote:
> I have a machine I plan to use solely for testing. I have FreeBSD
> 8.0-CURRENT on it right now, and would like to add FreeBSD 7.2-RC2 as
> well as CentOS 5.3 Linux.
>
> Presently I have three Master Boot Record primary
2009/4/26 Jorg Andersson :
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:45:33PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
>> I don't recall FreeBSD supporting extended partitions... at all
>
> I remember reading they aren't in /dev/ but still is mountable. Is this
> still the case?
They show up just fine here (8-current),
and I am
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:45:33PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
> I don't recall FreeBSD supporting extended partitions... at all
I remember reading they aren't in /dev/ but still is mountable. Is this
still the case?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Michael David Crawford wrote:
> I have a machine I plan to use solely for testing. I have FreeBSD
> 8.0-CURRENT on it right now, and would like to add FreeBSD 7.2-RC2 as well
> as CentOS 5.3 Linux.
>
> Presently I have three Master Boot Record primary partitions
2009/4/26 Michael David Crawford :
> I have a machine I plan to use solely for testing. I have FreeBSD
> 8.0-CURRENT on it right now, and would like to add FreeBSD 7.2-RC2 as well
> as CentOS 5.3 Linux.
>
> Presently I have three Master Boot Record primary partitions - "slices" in
> the FreeBSD pa
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:11:19AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:57:36AM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've partitioned my HD into 3 partitions.
> >
> > One is currently running FreeBSD6.2, the second has my data files (home
> > directories).
>
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:57:36AM +0200, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've partitioned my HD into 3 partitions.
>
> One is currently running FreeBSD6.2, the second has my data files (home
> directories).
> On the third I would like to install FreeBSD-current to play around a
> bit and g
Peter Boosten wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Is it possible after the installation of current on the 3rd partition that I
can use my data files
(home directories) without messing up the permissions/etc?
As long as the UIDs are the same it shoul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
>
> Is it possible after the installation of current on the 3rd partition that I
> can use my data files
> (home directories) without messing up the permissions/etc?
>
As long as the UIDs are the same it should work.
Peter
-
On 2006-04-09 18:56, Wil Hatfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > tmpmfs="YES"
> > tmpsize="100m"
> > tmpmfs_flags="-S -M -o noexec,nosuid"
> >
> > Is there something wrong with this because it isn't creating a
> > /tmp at all.
> >
> > Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
> > Copyright (c) 1
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:05 AM, Wil Hatfield wrote:
Thanks for the great kick in the right direction. Is it really
this easy? I
guess so cause it is working. I dropped in a helloworld script,
chmoded it
and even as root I couldn't run it. Supreme!
mdmfs -M -o noexec,nosuid -s 100m md0 /tmp
chmo
> tmpmfs="YES"
> tmpsize="100m"
> tmpmfs_flags="-S -M -o noexec,nosuid"
>
> Is there something wrong with this because it isn't creating a
> /tmp at all.
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
> The Regents
> "tmpmfs" and related variables in rc.conf(5).
> By default it does a memory-backed disk instead of file-backed, but
> that can be adjusted.
>
> Personally, I find memory-backed /tmp to be more useful anyway.
tmpmfs="YES"
tmpsize="100m"
tmpmfs_flags="-S -M -o noexec,nosuid"
Is there something w
"Wil Hatfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks for the great kick in the right direction. Is it really
> > this easy? I
> > guess so cause it is working. I dropped in a helloworld script, chmoded it
> > and even as root I couldn't run it. Supreme!
> >
> > mdmfs -M -o noexec,nosuid -s 100m m
> Thanks for the great kick in the right direction. Is it really
> this easy? I
> guess so cause it is working. I dropped in a helloworld script, chmoded it
> and even as root I couldn't run it. Supreme!
>
> mdmfs -M -o noexec,nosuid -s 100m md0 /tmp
> chmod 1777 /tmp
>
Ahhh crud! I guess it isn't
Chad,
> this appears that you want a file backed image file mounted as your /
> tmp. This should be easy to do. Read the handbook for file-backed md
> (4) devices.
>
> I don't use them for /tmp but I run them with jails... I have about
> 60 such image files mounted now for example
Thanks for t
On Apr 8, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Wil Hatfield wrote:
Ok I screwed up on one of my machines and forgot to put the /tmp
directory
on its own slice. How can I do this on an existing system? Linux
has this
procedure. Anything like it for FreeBSD?
dd if=/dev/zero of=tmpMnt bs=1024 count=10
/sbin
I don't see what the trouble. If you want a /tmp directory on a disk,
just do :
$ cd /foo# the disk you want, may be /
$ mkdir /tmp
Thats all.
2006/4/9, Wil Hatfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok I screwed up on one of my machines and forgot to put the /tmp directory
> on its own slice. How can
>
> Hi there,
>
> I just added a second drive to one of my FreeBSD servers. I am wondering if
> somebody can send me to a good URL tutorial that explains how to partition the
> drives.
It is documented in the handbook and also in the fdisk, disklabel and newfs
man pages.
In addition, I have wr
>
> I guess I didn't plan well in my partitioning scheme for this laptop.
>
> I have a 15G primary partition #1 containing XP,
> 15G logical partition #2 containing empty space recovered from
> a previous Linux install,
> 15G primary partition #3 containing FreeBSD, and the rest of
> the d
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:13:43PM -0800, Rob wrote:
> I guess I didn't plan well in my partitioning scheme for this laptop.
>
> I have a 15G primary partition #1 containing XP, 15G logical partition
> #2 containing empty space recovered from a previous Linux install, 15G
> primary partition
> #
On 17/01/06, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #2 containing empty space recovered from a previous Linux install, 15G
> primary partition
> t I would like to make partition #2 to also contain
> FreeBSD. But if I remember correctly there is no way to do such a
> thing without starting all over a
On Monday 16 January 2006 07:20, Malcolm Kay wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:03 am, Jona Joachim wrote:
> >
> > After creating a slice I created the partitions inside it with
> > disklabel. In every example I saw the swap partition was in
> > the second place. However, I want it to be in the begin
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:03 am, Jona Joachim wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm quite new to FreeBSD and I have some concerns about
> partitioning. I plan to install FreeBSD-6 as a desktop system
> and I bought a new Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JB hard
> drive to use it as a second disk for storing music, movies,
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2005 07:24 schrieb Quinn Ellis:
> Help! FreeBSDamsel in distress.
>
> I'm just starting out with this OS and already running into a problem.
> Initially I installed FreeBSD onto a seperate hdd but that died. I have
> a 120gig drive, that i want to partition into two 10gig driv
KÃvesdÃn GÃbor wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for Your answer.
If you have raid 5 on 3 x 100-Gb drives you will only get 200Gb partition.
In fact, the total capacity is 320GB, I have three 160Gb Samsung sata
drives.
"not official"
Do you mean, that you burn the ISO from ftp server, or you have co
* Carsten Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 02:08]:
> Hello list.
>
> I know this had been discussed quite often, but none of the posting
> google offered worked out for me. Please (B)Cc: me as I am not on the list.
>
> I have a Western Digital WDC WD400AB-00CMB0 40 GB IDE drive hooked
rive. Put FreeBSD install cd in drive and
reboot system to start install.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Carsten
Zimmermann
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:03 PM
To: Malcolm Kay
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Partitioning fails due to drive geom
Ok, which OS was installed on it before trying to install BSD?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carsten Zimmermann
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:03 PM
To: Malcolm Kay
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Partitioning fails due to drive
Thanks for the answers so far.
I tried to use the autocorrected values, of course. But I can't create a
partition with them (as said: I was able to delete a NTFS partition w/o
problems).
When I try to write the partition table, sysinstall / fdisk catches
signal 11. It seems fdisk is not able to
>
> Hello list.
>
> I know this had been discussed quite often, but none of the posting
> google offered worked out for me. Please (B)Cc: me as I am not on the list.=
> =20
>
> I have a Western Digital WDC WD400AB-00CMB0 40 GB IDE drive hooked in as
> pri slave in my system and wish to install F
On Monday 03 May 2004 18:33, Carsten Zimmermann wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> I know this had been discussed quite often, but none of the posting
> google offered worked out for me. Please (B)Cc: me as I am not on the list.
>
> I have a Western Digital WDC WD400AB-00CMB0 40 GB IDE drive hooked in as
> p
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:50:45 -0600, Teilhard Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am trying to install FreeBSD 5.1. I have created by means other than
the
installation program, a partitioning of my disk (160 Gig), and I want to
install on one of those partitions. I have three primary partitions a
Hi,
No one want the /usr partition to get full. You don't know what users may
put in the /home partition. So the best option will be create two partitions
with about 25% to /usr and 75% to the other.
Regards
SSR
From: "Guilmot Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:30:15AM -0400, Jud wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:27:37 +0200, "Michael Vondung"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Backup matters aside, is there a significant advantage of having a
> > separate
> > /home partition at all? If not, just skipping /home and using 70GB for
>
"Michael Vondung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Backup matters aside, is there a significant advantage of having a separate
> /home partition at all? If not, just skipping /home and using 70GB for /usr
> (including /usr/home) might be the most practical and flexible approach?
If it's not a server
>
> I'm trying to figure out a decent partitioning layout for a workstation. The
> system has an ~80GB disk. After /, /var, /tmp and swap, I have 70GB left.
> I'm wondering how to split these between /usr and /home. Ironically, it is
> more space than I seem to need. The box has only one user (me)
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:27:37 +0200, "Michael Vondung"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm trying to figure out a decent partitioning layout for a workstation.
> The
> system has an ~80GB disk. After /, /var, /tmp and swap, I have 70GB left.
> I'm wondering how to split these between /usr and /home. Iro
Michael Vondung wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out a decent partitioning layout for a
> workstation. The system has an ~80GB disk. After /, /var, /tmp and
> swap, I have 70GB left. I'm wondering how to split these between /usr
> and /home. Ironically, it is more space than I seem to need. The box
>
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:27, Karsten Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hello, i am trying to partition my 1.6TB scsi raid.
> The problem is that disklabel only support up to 8 partitions but i want
> more (about 30).
>
> Is there any way to do this ?
>
I've never had anything to do with hardware raid but if it is s
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Karsten Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hello, i am trying to partition my 1.6TB scsi raid.
> The problem is that disklabel only support up to 8 partitions but i want
> more (about 30).
>
> Is there any way to do this ?
>
> Cheers,
> Karsten
Yes--you'll need to create additional BSD slic
> Can you send me some information about how much space freebsd will take
> up, i want to keep Win XP as my main OS ... Thanks.
Although Free can be installed on a partition under 500M, 3G will give you
more than adequate playing space, with some reasonable storage in your
home directory.
I like
81 matches
Mail list logo
