If you want to use gmirror + gjournal on the root filesystem (/), be
sure to use FreeBSD 7.2. A bug prevented the system to boot on unclean
shutdown because the replay of the journal took too much time and
FreeBSD wanted to mount non-existant (yet) devices. It caused me a lot
of trouble when I inst
On 8 Jun 2009 , freebsd-questions-requ...@freebsd.org entreated about
"freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 262, Issue 2":
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:18:09 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar
> > SO, to the original question, yes that motherboard will work just
> > fine. What are you
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, DA Forsyth wrote:
> > I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
> > http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
>
> Nice, esp when you compile world. Last year I upgraded our server
> to a Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, Intel DG965 board. 2GB RAM. Previous board
> was a
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, DA Forsyth wrote:
> > I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
> > http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
>
> Nice, esp when you compile world. Last year I upgraded our server
> to a Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, Intel DG965 board. 2GB RAM. Previous board
> was a
the onboard SATA sockets so I could increase our available disk space
(4x500GB in RAID5 for data).
However, a nice benefit is that the Core2 will compile world in 1/4
the time, and user don't notice the server is 'busy'.
Core2 is actually only a bit faster per clock cycle than PIII, but you
ha
> I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
> http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
Nice, esp when you compile world. Last year I upgraded our server
to a Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, Intel DG965 board. 2GB RAM. Previous board
was an ASUS P3 1.1GHz, which now hosts my backup server. Both ran
2009/6/6 Wojciech Puchar :
>> Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
>> the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of
>> that
>> even when under load.
>>
>> In fact a typical modern desktop computer will, when idle, draw less than
>> 100W
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
> > the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of that
> > even when under load.
> >
> > In fact a typical modern desktop computer
Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of that
even when under load.
In fact a typical modern desktop computer will, when idle, draw less than
100W for the whole system. It is not even difficul
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:43:23AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
> > normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
> > thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
> > to draw u
Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
to draw under 4W of power when idle with EIST enabled. This power draw
unless CPU are c
On 6/5/09, Gabriel Lavoie wrote:
> Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
> normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
> thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
> to draw under 4W of power when idle with EIST en
Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
to draw under 4W of power when idle with EIST enabled. This power draw
on Intel 45nm CPUs
2009/6/5 Gabriel Lavoie :
> I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
>
> http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
>
What a waste... How much power does that chug??
Chris
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top
I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
2009/6/5 Valentin Bud :
> Hello community,
>
> I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
> CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
>
> I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
>
is really pentium 4 "downlevel" hardware? sound like a joke to me.
Not really. But considering how everyone is buying Core Duos and quads
these days, you can get decent P4s for free.
could you please tell me where i can get P4 machine for free? :)
__
Sorry - it wasn't really intended that way. Please note that "slightly
downlevel..." was meant to refer to a combination of older Netburst
architecture and consumer retail motherboard.
The Core Xeons that replaced the old Netburst processors are much better
performers. In a true datacenter server
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> This is one place where FreeBSD is very good. It will give you
>> performance on slightly downlevel hardware that Windows Server just can't
>> touch.
>>
> is really pentium 4 "downlevel" hardware? sound like a joke to me.
Sorry - it wasn't really intended that way. Pleas
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> This is one place where FreeBSD is very good. It will give you
>> performance
>> on slightly downlevel hardware that Windows Server just can't touch.
>>
> is really pentium 4 "downlevel" hardware? sound like a joke to me.
>
>
Not really. But considering how everyone is buy
This is one place where FreeBSD is very good. It will give you performance
on slightly downlevel hardware that Windows Server just can't touch.
is really pentium 4 "downlevel" hardware? sound like a joke to me.
i made all-need server for small office (8 people) using PIII/500 and 384
MB RAM. i
Valentin Bud wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
> CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
>
> I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
> configuration
> and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
> u
10 times more power than needed. disks speed is the only limit
I have a P-II at 400 MHz running as a file server. See about 5 MB/sec on
it depends from both sides ability, but pentium 100 with SDRAM memory can
saturate 100Mbit/s network running FreeBSD 6.2
__
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> >What i mainly try to achieve, talking in storage space, is 2 HDD of 1TB in
> >mirroring using gmirror(8) and 1 separate HDD of 500Gb.
> >
> >So do you think the system I've mentioned would handle the load? The server
>
> 10 time
2009/6/5 Valentin Bud :
> Hello community,
>
> I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
> CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
>
> I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
> configuration
> and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
>
I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
this is not old - very powerfull machine.
I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
using samba.
Valentin Bud wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
> CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
>
> I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
> configuration
> and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
> usin
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:57:21PM +0300, Valentin Bud wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
> CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
>
> I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
> configuration and running FreeBSD on such a syste
27 matches
Mail list logo
