all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it
doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still
same.
Are your ports up to date? Also, did you apply any funky compile time flags?
yes and no.
But i found the answer.
when i use xdm as
Hello,
On 20-May-2012, at 3:00 AM, User Wojtek wrote:
> the problem is that what i found is not this.
>
> all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it
> doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still
> same.
Are your ports up to d
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Google find many things with "javaldx failed".
Is a problem with j
Never mind...
Not sure how to get around the issue posted, but a portupdate solved the
problem -- now building apache-oo instead of oo
On 05/23/12 18:06, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Theref
On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Therefore some may not be available.
Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient.
ok, attempting that...
After copying the jdk-6u3-fcs... files that it compla
Hello Gary Aitken,
>
> 1. I'm assuming that since pkg_add looks for the tarball, it is
> supposed to exist. Is that a valid assumption?
>
It is sort of. Have look at
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/All/
>
> 2. Anyone know why the tarball isn't there? Should
the problem is that what i found is not this.
all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it.
it doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and
still same.
On Sat, 19 May 2012, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:
On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:
[wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0
[Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument
(elements.cxx).javaldx failed!
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
compiled fine, installed without pro
On 28/12/2010 14:42, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ajtiM wrote:
>
>> On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
>>
>> I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
>> LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ajtiM wrote:
> On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
> LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a long t
>> Abiword: Otherwise I would be using that and ignoring Openoffice.
Ted can do RTF and has few deps.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-q
On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
Thanks.
> Hi,
>
> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> packages, but I
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:57:59 -0500
Jerry McAllister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
>
>
> By the way I tried Abiword and could not read in a plain text file -
> one with just regular tex
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:21:35 +0100, "Daniel C. Dowse" wrote:
> Hi, that is where i dwnld my oo pkg.
>
> http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ ->
>
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
>
> and I had no problems whatsoever with dwnld and installing it.
I've also t
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:57:59 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
>packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
>
>I have been fishing around at all the old sites where I found
>it some years ago and can't seem to find an
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
>
> I have been fishing around at all the old sites where I found
> it some years ago and can't seem to find anything
Ah, I see.
I should learn about all those java licenses some day. I thought there
was a free java somewhere.
Thanks,
Antonio
On 28/07/2010 18:26, Jack L. wrote:
Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being built
"Jack L." wrote:
> Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
> dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being
> built automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site
> for them.
The 8.1 package collection on freebsd.org includes OOo 2.4.3.
Unless OOo
Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being built
automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site for them.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Antonio Vieiro
wrote:
> D'oh! Are those the official packages? p
D'oh! Are those the official packages? pkg_add -r -v openoffice3 didn't
work from the command line (that's why I posted this, just in case
there're any other newbies reading this ;-)).
Cheers,
Antonio
On 27/07/2010 17:15, Jack L. wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
wrote
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
> official package yet):
>
> This:
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
>
> From
> ft
I'll see about compiling binaries with certain configurations ;) Need
to add a few more hard drives to my mirrors to accomodate this!
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould
> wrote:
>> Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould
wrote:
> Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option for many of us due to
> hardware restraints.
>
> I'm glad to see that there's a compiled binary somewhere!
Additionally, there's also the problem of the various configurational
items for the
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
>> official package yet):
>>
>> This:
>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/O
Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
> Hi all,
>
> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
> official package yet):
>
> This:
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
>
> From
> ftp://ooo
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:09:36 +
O. Hartmann articulated:
> Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to
> install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before.
OO creates files in the $HOME and other directories that are not
automatically removed by "pkg_delete". Use "
On 03/23/10 17:31, Sean McAfee wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working
OO first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
Regards,
O. Hartmann
You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a
binary backup. I
On 23.03.2010 11:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an
existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the
error below.
On another box, also running Fre
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Sean McAfee <
smca...@collaborativefusion.com> wrote:
> O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO
>> first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> O. Hartmann
>>
>
> You can use `
O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO
first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
Regards,
O. Hartmann
You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary
backup. If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just
On 03/23/10 17:27, Dánielisz László wrote:
Hi,
Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?
László
*From:* O. Hartmann
*To:* freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
*Sent:* Tue, March
Hi,
Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?
László
From: O. Hartmann
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 11:10:56 AM
Subject: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64
didn't realise there is a freebsd-openoffice list! sorry for the noise
2009/6/6 John . :
> Hello list,
--
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Robert Huff wrote:
Jon writes:
Have you had any success getting openoffice working? I have a similar
problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1. Upon attempting to
run openoffice, I get:
$ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":
Jon writes:
> Have you had any success getting openoffice working? I have a similar
> problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1. Upon attempting to
> run openoffice, I get:
> $ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
> Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
> Xl
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and
ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again:
...
(soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib: extension "Gen
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:43 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote:
> Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4?
Yes, xorg was updated some days ago. I upgraded OO yesterday.
--
The only thing better than love is milk.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and
ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again:
...
(soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib: extension "Gen
From: Sebastian Setzer
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0100
> Thanks,
> with diablo 1.6 it works.
>
> To the openoffice porting team:
> Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/?
>
From: Sebastian Setzer
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0100
> Thanks,
> with diablo 1.6 it works.
>
> To the openoffice porting team:
> Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/?
>
riginal Message-
From: Kurt Buff
Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 9:54 PM
To: Sebastian Setzer
Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
$ uname -a
FreeBSD grimsqueaker-bsd.pigfarm.org 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #7:
Sun Jan 11 21:12:44 PST 2009 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
$ pkg_i
Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The OpenOffice.org dictionaries page says:
>
> IMPORTANT NOTE: From OpenOffice.org 3.0 on the dictionary wizard
> is not longer available -- Dictionaries are now available via
> the extensions repository.
>
> [http://wiki.s
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 22:01 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
>
> > Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
> > for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I
> > downloaded
> >
> >
> > http://ftp.services.op
On Friday 07 November 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
> for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I
> downloaded
>
>
> http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/diction
>aries/dicooo/DicOOo.sxw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:17:25 +
Craig Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:13 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
> > I've installed en-openoffice.org-GB-3.0.0 from ports on my 6.4-RC1
> > system. The install, using the command
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:13 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
> I've installed en-openoffice.org-GB-3.0.0 from ports on my 6.4-RC1
> system. The install, using the command
> portinstall -m "LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB -DWITH_KDE"
> editors/openoffice.org-3, appeared to complete OK and I can
> run /usr/loc
On Sunday 10 August 2008 17:43:23 Warren Liddell wrote:
> I am using FreeBSD 7.0-CURREENT all ports/src upto date as of this
> morning.. when trying to compile oo below is the result during the make.
> What seems ot be causing this error ?
2 module(s):
icu
openssl
need(s) to be re
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.0
I think your best bet (if you want to use OO) is to use PC-BSD. There is
a PBI package already available for it.
Just my two cents,
"Bono Vince Malum"
--
-Camilo
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:44:55 +
> From: "O. Hartmann"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compila
Chris Whitehouse wrote the following, On 06/16/08 14:20:
> O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3
>> did well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this
>> sticky error.
>>
>> Can anyone help?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver
>>
> In c
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1)
does build with
Tim Kellers writes:
> I can confirm the error. I tried rebuilding everything I could think of
> in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
>
> ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
> dmake: Error code 1, while
I can confirm the error. I tried rebuilding everything I could think of
in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
O.
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
I am not able tohelp but just to confirm this is due to libxml2 not
being found right (note to maintainer
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:27:47 -0300
Mario Lobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> unset JAVA_HOME
> make install
>
Yes, this seems to work. Thanks.
Marco
--
If the weather is extremely bad, church attendance will be down.
If the weather is extremely good, church attendance will be down.
If the bul
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:16:09 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try to install OO from the ports I get the message "Environment
> error: "JAVA_HOME" should not be defined".
>
> Does anyone know how to get rid of this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marco
unset JAVA_HOME
make install
--
Mario Lobo
ht
>
> >
> >
> > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
>
> Do you have one?
>
yes i do. And i wonder why it showed up there in the first place.
>
> > I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale "en_US"
>
> There is no such locale "en_US", but e.g. en_US.UTF-8; can you check it?
>
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> According to what can be read on the page I sent with my previous
> mail, it seems to be a GTK-related issue. I confirm that all 7-stable
> OpenOffice packages (including 2.3.1_1) work perfectly on my plain
> 7.0-RELEASE/i386 install, but with *up-t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:18:57 +
Mike Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
>
> > (BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/por
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> (BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
>
>
> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editor
>s/
>
> -- have you considered trying them?)
I tried this about a week ago without much success. I could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:34:05 +0300
"Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Do you have one?
> I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale "en_US"
There is no such locale "en_US",
Hi,
I mistakenly forgot to add the errors i get. I can open any OO program, but
as soon as i open a document, i get this
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale "en_US"
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x64
(proc
Hi,
Apologies for not responding sooner, i have been away since last week.
Eduardo, i installed if from ports
Which gcc version do you use? I recall that someone described similar
> symptoms on FreeBSD/amd64 with OpenOffice.org compiled using gcc-4.1.
> It was a bug in gcc-4.1; recompiling with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:55:56 +0300
"Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running FreeBSD 7.0 Pre-Release on an HP 6720s Laptop. I am
> experiencing a strange problem with OpenOffice.
>
> Every time i open a document/spreadsh
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:01:51 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Strange, there seem to be more instances of libstdc++.so.6 than when I
> search for the file with locate.
For future ref: locate uses a cache, built weekly using periodic(8). Find
searches the disk live, so locate is faster but can b
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> >
> > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
>
> Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under
> > /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.
>
>
> what's the output of:
> ls /var/db/pkg|grep gcc
gcc-4.2.2_20070905
gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2
gccmakedep-1.0.2
> and:
> find /usr/local -name 'libstdc++*'
/usr/local/lib/compat/
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:08:28 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> > >
> > > No, the FreeBSD jdk15
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> >
> > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
>
> Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
>
> No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get
uninstalled after buil
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
--
"What George Washington did for us was to throw out the British, so
that we wouldn't have a fat, insensitive government running our
country. Nice try anyway, Georg
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:43:39 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
> this messages:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "javaldx"
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6"
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Christian Baer wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
>
> > I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
> > needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
> > went ok.
>
> How did you
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
> needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
> went ok.
How did you do that?
Regards,
Chris
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Marco Beishuizen writes:
> >
> > After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
> > this messages:
> >
> > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> > by "javaldx"
> >
> > Compiling
NetOpsCenter writes:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?
>
> So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file
> names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it
> finishes its part.
1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing li
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to NetOpsCenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Aloha,
I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
outside.
In response to NetOpsCenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aloha,
>
> I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
> located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
> error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
> outside. But the files
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:13:52 +0200
"[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
> > installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to
> > crash" crash changes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_
> experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1).
> Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try.
> I attached m
Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Hi all,
> all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
> installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to
> crash" crash changes depending on what is done:
>
> - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
> Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
> > 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the of
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
> 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager.
> The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done:
>
> -
"Stroganov A. V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> I've FreeBSD 6.2 prerelease for amd64. When i start OOo, which i
> installed using package from Good-Day, these messages are printed:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "javaldx"
> /libexec/ld-
This hack presumably results in a broken slidesorter, but at least
Writer seems to work (after a fashion), and that's all I really need.
Since the *.obj are just empty sentinel files indicating that the
corresponding *.o have been built, this
# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0
# touch
> > Making: ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
...
> > g++-ooo: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
...
> > dmake: Error code 1, while making
> > '../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj'
> > '---* tg_merge.mk *---'
> >
> > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
>
Perry Hutchison writes:
Anyone seen this and know how to get past it?
Configuring out the failing component would be fine,
if possible, since I really only need the word processor.
Making: ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
g++-ooo -fmessage-length=0 -c -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
--- Perry Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone seen this and know how to get past it?
> Configuring out the failing component would be fine,
> if possible, since I really only need the word
> processor.
>
> Making:
> ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
> g++-ooo -fmessage-
Perry Hutchison writes:
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid argument'
during '
> > Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
> > several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
> > that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
> >
> > GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid
> > argument' during 'pthre
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Michael Hughes wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 06 17:37:36 PDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start
On Wed, 6 Sep 06 17:37:36 PDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
> Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
> several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
> that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
>
> GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:
> Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
> several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
> that Firefox has quit working. When I try to start it:
>
> GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'In
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I saw an email that suggested that the problem is that the epm that
comes bundled with the openoffice source has a problem with argument
lines that are too long.
Changing the name of the ports directory to /usr/p fixed it for me.
Thanks, Thanks, Thanks and Th
Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Trying to setup openoffice 1.1.5 on a FBSD6.1 box (pkg was added
during install) and just wondering about where to install what . . .
there a multiple accounts on the one machine that need access . . . do
I do a "Local Install" as root (to /usr/local/bin ???
Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to setup openoffice 1.1.5 on a FBSD6.1 box (pkg was added
> during install) and just wondering about where to install what . . .
> there a multiple accounts on the one machine that need access . . . do
> I do a "Local Install" as root (to /usr/local/bin
Subhro wrote:
On 6/2/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/1/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
>> > it's a
On 6/2/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/1/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
>> > it's a strange problem.
>
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The net thing to do would presumably be to look at the log file
> referenced in the error message included in your original posting.
Um, "next" thing to do...
[Sorry.]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
The net thing to do would presumably be to look at the log file
referenced in the error message included in your original posting.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
