additional info
sysctl -a | grep igb
"IGB Core Lock","igb0:tx(0)"
"igb0:tx(0)","bpf interface lock" <
"igb0:tx(0)","system map"
"igb0:tx(0)","UMA zone"
"IGB Core Lock","igb0:tx(1)"
"igb0:tx(1)","system map"
"igb0:tx(1)","UMA zone"
"IGB Core Lock","igb0:tx(2)"
"igb0:tx(2)","bpf in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thiago ...
What version of kernel did you end up going back to?
- --On Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:15:48 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm seeing the same effect (haven't tried older ke
Nejc Škoberne-2 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to solve this problem by myself for a long time now, but
> no luck.
> I run a few dozens of FreeBSD 5.3/5.4 machines, which serve as routers,
> NAT boxes,
> Apache, Postfix, OpenVPN, ... servers. Most of them are low-cost PC
> machines sinc
On Monday, 23 April 2007 at 4:06:10 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:20:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > - --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:20:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> - --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code,
> > had to use it because of broadcom 5755 nic card, I plan to use large
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, April 07, 2007 20:12:00 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also to add I now have a 2nd box using 6.2 STABLE few days old code,
> had to use it because of broadcom 5755 nic card, I plan to use large
> tcp window sizes so will
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
> feb 24 code, the machine isn't using g
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
> feb 24 code, the machine isn't using g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
> feb 24 code, the machine isn't using gmirror. I had to recude
> recvspace and sendspace to lower
On 05/04/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:06:30 + Thiago Esteves de Oliveira
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marc,
>
> My machine is working with the kernel that comes with 6.1-STABLE (I archive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:06:30 + Thiago Esteves de Oliveira
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marc,
>
> My machine is working with the kernel that comes with 6.1-STABLE (I archived
> this good kernel before upgrade the OS to 6.2).
> No,
Marc,
My machine is working with the kernel that comes with 6.1-STABLE (I
archived this good kernel before upgrade the OS to 6.2).
No, I'm not using geom.
Can you send your dmesg.boot and "sysctl -a kern" output?
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thi
Marc,
My machine is working with the kernel that comes with 6.1-STABLE (I archived
this good kernel
before upgrade the OS to 6.2).
No, I'm not using geom.
Can you send your dmesg.boot and "sysctl -a kern" output?
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thiago ...
What version of kernel did you end up going back to?
- --On Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:15:48 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm seeing the same effect (hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm seeing the same effect (haven't tried older kernel, mind you) almost like
clockwork, every 72 hours after reboot ... at least now I don't feel so crazy,
knowing it isn't just me ...
- --On Sunday, April 01, 2007 17:07:08 -0300 Thiago Esteves de
I've tried to increase the kern.ipc.nmbclusters value but it worked only when I
changed the kernel
to an older one.
netstat -m (Now it's working with the same values.)
-
515/850/1365 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
512/390/902/65024 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
512/243 mbuf+c
Show us netstat -m on the broken kernel? Show us your dmesg(8) for
em(4).
TIA,
~BAS
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:13 -0300, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've had a problem with one of my FreeBSD servers, the machine has stopped
> its network services
> and then sent these messages
Your trying to run too many memory hungry applications at same time.
Tweaking the kernel is not going to help you. Adding more ram will.
Better to only run single network monitoring application at a time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Youse
Always in the past with my hardware this has been due to indifferent
network adapters cards. Post a dmesg please.
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Ricardo Pichler
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:47 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebs
Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry. I'm a dumbass.
We all have our moments :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
131/32768/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
You ran out of mbuf clusters at some point.
What part of the netstat -m indicated this?
Wel
Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >131/32768/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> > You ran out of mbuf clusters at some point.
> What part of the netstat -m indicated this?
Well, duh. The part I quo
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
131/32768/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
You ran out of mbuf clusters at some point.
What part of the netstat -m indicated this?
How can I fix this?
Add "kern.ipc.nmbclusters=65536" to /boot/loader.conf
Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 131/32768/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
You ran out of mbuf clusters at some point.
> How can I fix this?
Add "kern.ipc.nmbclusters=65536" to /boot/loader.conf and reboot.
BTW, -chat is not the appropriate forum for this kind of questi
24 matches
Mail list logo
