On Friday 31 October 2008 02:20:39 Brendan Hart wrote:
> > Is it possible that nfs directory got written to /usr at some point in
>
> time?
>
> > You would only notice this with du if the nfs directory is unmounted.
> > Unmount it and ls -al /usr/mountpoint should only give you an empty dir
>
> Bi
00
Fax: 08-8274-1400
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 12:02 PM
To: Brendan Hart
Cc: 'Mel'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Large discrepancy in reported disk usage on USR partition
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:50:39AM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
#: df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/aacd0s1a 496M163M 293M36%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100% /dev
/dev/aacd0s1e 496M1
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:50:39AM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
> >> #: df -h
> >> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> >> /dev/aacd0s1a 496M163M 293M36%/
> >> devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100% /dev
> >> /dev/aacd0s1e 496M15
>> #: df -h
>> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
>> /dev/aacd0s1a 496M163M 293M36%/
>> devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100% /dev
>> /dev/aacd0s1e 496M15M 441M3% /tmp
>> /dev/aacd0s1f28G25G 1.2G
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:15:15AM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
> > What you showed tells me nothing about SMART, other than the remote
> > possibility
> > its basing some of its decisions on the "general SMART health status",
> > which means jack squat. I can explain why this is if need be, but
>> I took a look at using the smart tools as you suggested, but have now
>> found that the disk in question is a RAID1 set on a DELL PERC 3/Di
>> controller and smartctl does not appear to be the correct tool to
>> access the SMART data for the individual disks. After a little
>> research, I h
On Thursday 30 October 2008 01:42:32 Brendan Hart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have inherited some servers running various releases of FreeBSD and I am
> having some trouble with the /usr partition on one of these boxen.
>
> The problem is that there appears to be far more space used on the USR
> partition t
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:04:36PM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
> On Thu 30/10/2008 12:25 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> Could the "missing" space be an indication of hardware disk issues i.e.
> >> physical blocks marked as bad?
>
> >The simple answer is no, bad blocks would not cause what you're
On Thu 30/10/2008 12:25 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Could the "missing" space be an indication of hardware disk issues i.e.
>> physical blocks marked as bad?
>The simple answer is no, bad blocks would not cause what you're seeing.
>smartctl -a /dev/disk will help you determine if there's eviden
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:11:58PM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
> The space reserved as minfree does not appear to have been changed from the
> default setting of 8%.
Okay, then that's likely not the problem.
> Is your suggestion that I should change it to a larger value?
That would just make your
er 2008 11:50 AM
To: Brendan Hart
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Large discrepancy in reported disk usage on USR partition
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:12:32AM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
> I have inherited some servers running various releases of FreeBSD and I am
> having some tr
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:12:32AM +1030, Brendan Hart wrote:
> I have inherited some servers running various releases of FreeBSD and I am
> having some trouble with the /usr partition on one of these boxen.
>
> The problem is that there appears to be far more space used on the USR
> partition tha
13 matches
Mail list logo