Re: Installing the JDK without Xorg

2005-01-29 Thread Pat Maddox
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:22:19 +1030, Ian Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:13, Pat Maddox wrote: > > I built it on an Athlon XP, couple years old, and I'm going to install > > the jdk on a Barton machine. So it should work if I install it as a > > package... > Pardon my igno

Re: Installing the JDK without Xorg

2005-01-29 Thread Pat Maddox
I built it on an Athlon XP, couple years old, and I'm going to install the jdk on a Barton machine. So it should work if I install it as a package... On the other hand, it's a production server, so I imagine I should probably just build it from scratch, just to be safe. On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:0

Re: Installing the JDK without Xorg

2005-01-29 Thread Ian Moore
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:29, Pat Maddox wrote: > Thanks for the help. I got a suggestion on a forum to build it as a > package..."make MINIMAL=yes package" I haven't created a package from > a port, so I'm not entirely sure what that'll do. It installed Java > fine and left me with a bzip2 file.

Re: Installing the JDK without Xorg

2005-01-29 Thread Pat Maddox
Thanks for the help. I got a suggestion on a forum to build it as a package..."make MINIMAL=yes package" I haven't created a package from a port, so I'm not entirely sure what that'll do. It installed Java fine and left me with a bzip2 file. Does this mean I can just copy that file to any other

Re: Installing the JDK without Xorg

2005-01-29 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've installed the native jdk14 successfully, but noticed that it > installed Xorg along with it. I imagine that's a dependency for the > Java plugin or something. I'm using this machine just as a test > server, I won't be using X at all, so I'd like to b