Colin J. Raven wrote:
Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in the handbook
and elsewhere. In fact I did read that exerpt you quoted the URL
for above sometime previously, when it was quoted in another thread
on the list.
Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue tho
>
> On Mar 16 at 09:47, Jerry McAllister commented:
>
> >>
> >> "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
> >>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, yeah
On Mar 16 at 09:47, Jerry McAllister commented:
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM
Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in t
>
> "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
>
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM
> >
> > Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in the
> > handbook and
On Mar 16 at 09:24, Lowell Gilbert then said:
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM
Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in the
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM
>
> Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in the
> handbook and elsewhere. In fact
On Mar 16 at 15:34, Giorgos Keramidas suggested:
Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue though.
The issue is this:
Swap: 8192M Total, 116K Used, 8192M Free
and that's the piece of the puzzle that has us all utterly baffled.
No way in creation this box should be swapping.
Do you, by any c
On 2005-03-16 14:17, "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mar 16 at 15:07, Giorgos Keramidas said:
>>On 2005-03-16 14:02, "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On Mar 16 at 14:54, Giorgos Keramidas asked:
>Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue though.
>
>
On Mar 16 at 15:07, Giorgos Keramidas said:
On 2005-03-16 14:02, "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 16 at 14:54, Giorgos Keramidas asked:
Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue though.
The issue is this:
Swap: 8192M Total, 116K Used, 8192M Free
and that's the piece of the
On 2005-03-16 14:02, "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mar 16 at 14:54, Giorgos Keramidas asked:
>>>Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue though.
>>>
>>>The issue is this:
>>>Swap: 8192M Total, 116K Used, 8192M Free
>>>and that's the piece of the puzzle that has us all utt
On Mar 16 at 14:54, Giorgos Keramidas asked:
On 2005-03-16 13:36, "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mem: 479M Active, 2470M Inact, 337M Wired, 101M Cache, 199M Buf, 5468K Free
On 2005-03-16 13:36, "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
>>"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>Mem: 479M Active, 2470M Inact, 337M Wired, 101M Cache, 199M Buf, 5468K Free
>>>Swap: 8192M Total, 116K Used, 8192M
On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream:
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hard to believe, but this beast is swapping. Here's a typical top
snapshot:
load averages: 0.75, 0.36, 0.23 up 14+12:39:04 12:40:02
128 processes: 1 running, 125 sleeping, 2 zombie
"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hard to believe, but this beast is swapping. Here's a typical top
> snapshot:
>
> load averages: 0.75, 0.36, 0.23 up 14+12:39:04 12:40:02
> 128 processes: 1 running, 125 sleeping, 2 zombie
> CPU states:
> 7.5% user, 0.0% nice, 1.3% system, 0.0
14 matches
Mail list logo
