* Me:
> > <>[1] One could argue that I should have at least two name servers, but why
> > should I need greater redundancy on my name servers, than I have on my
> > other services? If my dns is down, so is my mail, and am in the mercy of
> > the sender to keep retrying anyway.
* Jim Freeze
Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
<>[snippage]
<>I currently only have one computer on my domain, and it provides dns
lookups for itself (and virtual servers)[1]
[snippage]
<>[1] One could argue that I should have at least two name servers,
but why
should I need greater redundancy on my name servers
* Jim Freeze [2005-05-02 15:31 -0500]
> Suppose I own two domains: abc.com and xyz.org.
> I want to host these domains myself and have them provide
> the primary and secondary name servers for each other.
>
> Is this possible? Seems kind of circular.
>
> In theory I would have ns1.abc.com
