APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
two other systems connected directly via ethernet to the freebsd box.
I'm able to connect to the internet with the FreeBSD box. I
> From: APseudoUtopia
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
> 9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
> two other systems connected directly via ethernet to the freebsd box.
> I'm able to connect to the internet with the
On 04/12/2011 18:43, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> I'd like to have the internal network be on 192.168.1.0/24. I have 2x
>> > 2-port NICs in the freebsd box.
>> >
>> > em0 - Internet - 1.2.3.4
>> > em1 - System1 - 192.168.1.1
>> > em2 - System2 - 192.168.1.2
> if you connect the two other boxes direct
Hello,
El día Sunday, December 04, 2011 a las 01:21:58PM -0500, APseudoUtopia escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
> 9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
> two other systems connected directly via ethernet t
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 12:44 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
> > Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net,
> >> 1
> >> NIC for the DSL
> >>- same as above
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net, 1
NIC for the DSL
- same as above, just have to tell your box how to connect to your ISP
ok, this is interest
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:33:50 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :) i figured...but i asked just in the crazy chance that PPoE meant u
> could use any Ethernet capable device (like a NIC) to connect to DSL.
> Oh well, it'd been cool if true :D
>
If I were you I'd go with your origi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:33:50 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :) i figured...but i asked just in the crazy chance that PPoE
> meant u could use any Ethernet capable device (like a NIC) to
> connect to DSL. Oh well, it'd been cool if true :D
I can't speak in the general case, b
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 04:16:13 +0200
Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 03:45:39 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
> >
> > Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home
On Monday 02 July 2007 03:45:39 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
>
> Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home
> > net, 1 NIC for the DSL
^^
> > - same as above, just ha
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net, 1
> NIC for the DSL
> - same as above, just have to tell your box how to connect to your ISP
ok, this is interesting. You mean, plug the
At 11:43 AM 6/29/2007, zbigniew szalbot wrote:
As far as I remember, when installing FBSD I chose not to install
Linux binary compatibility (not sure if that matters though). But my
question is more general. Can Linux software be safely (and
securely) used on a unix platform? I am happy to use
On Friday 29 June 2007 09:13:09 zigniew szalbot wrote:
> >
> > If you use the wireless in the DSL modem, you'll be bypassing the BSD
> > server.
>
> Just one question here. If I plug the router to the lan NIC and configure
> it to take DHCP and DNS settings from the BSD box, then the wireless will
Hello,
> I'll 2nd the suggestion for IPCop www.ipcop.org It's Linux, not BSD --
not my first OS choice, but it's a mature, feature laden product (that
already has squid built in) that is better and more secure than
something
> you could whip up yourself in a weekend.
As far as I remember, when i
Gaye Abdoulaye wrote:
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
If your are searching a BSD like solution, you have pfsense:
http://www.pfsense.org/
But what I use IPCOP: http://www.ipcop.org/
With so
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:00:01 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
> "zigniew szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I
> > will need to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC
Hi there again,
>> Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I will
>> need
>> to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then the other NIC will
>> be
>> used to connect the Dlink router. I figure the Dlink router essentially
>> becomes redundant but it is a wireless mach
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
"zigniew szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I will need
> to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then the other NIC will be
> used to connect the Dlink router. I figure the Dlink rou
Hi,
> Back in '96 I used to run squid on a (linux Slackware) 486 DX 100Mhz, 64
> MB RAM
> for 20 to 30 computers, with a dialup line. I can't imagine why it
> wouldn't
> work or be overkill for your setup :) I actually have the same setup in
> mind
> (down to the compaq + Dlink in bridged mode :-D
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
"zigniew szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, will squid not be an
> overkill for a family network consisting of 3-4 machines? The box I want
> to devote for gateway/pc purposes is a Compaq PIII 866 Mhz with 512 MB RAM
> and 40GB HD.
Hi Zignie
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:07 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
I use squid and dansguardian. Very easy to setup.
/usr/ports/www/dansguardian
I have never tried squid but it seems quite a big package. I have also
seen oops but not sure which to choose. Basically, will squid not
be an
overkill for
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based on
which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
gateway.
>> > I'd rather u
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
>> > would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
>> > on which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
>> > gateway.
>>
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
>> > would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
>> > on which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
>> > gateway.
>>
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
>> > would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
>> > on which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
>> > gateway.
>>
On Thursday 28 June 2007 18:08:33 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:40 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
> > On the software side I am also looking for some kind of parental
> > control
> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
> > would
> > have to be something
On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:40 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
On the software side I am also looking for some kind of parental
control
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
on which
sites containing
zigniew szalbot a écrit :
Hello,
I am looking for advice. I have a dlink router/modem that connects to my
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
What kind of set up should I be aiming for to make it po
Hi Tim,
Which of the firewalls do you want to use and if you want to use both what
do you want the functionality to be? If you can send your rc.conf,ipf.conf
and ipnat.conf I could check out the ipf part and see if I find anything.
Obviously Glen's experience with ipfw is more extensive than min
At 01:46 AM 8/15/2005, Tim Holmes wrote:
For years I've used a FreeBSD as my gateway. Well I haven't had a high
speed connection for 3 years now, and I've just gotten it back. Since
then I've reloaded the machine from 4.3 to 5.3. I thought I had it all
set up so when I did get connection, I c
Micah Bushouse wrote:
"Victor Foulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
"Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is
the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really
hurt performance under load. So toss th
> > "Victor Foulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is
> the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really
> hurt performance under load. So toss the cheapo Realtek cards
Bill Moran wrote:
"Victor Foulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced
networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN
workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to
enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal networ
"Victor Foulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have been looking into setting up a network gateway
> using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the
> network security features of the system (and to
> overcome the fact that the current network is
> insecurely connected to a mu
Victor Foulk wrote:
Hello all,
I have been looking into setting up a network gateway
using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the
network security features of the system (and to
overcome the fact that the current network is
insecurely connected to a much larger ~public LAN).
The configur
PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: FreeBSD Gateway???
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Duda wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
|> Does anyone have any suggestions
|> on the type of NIC I should use?
|
|
| Almost any "normal" NIC will be fine. I'm using mostly Realtek-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Duda wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
|> Does anyone have any suggestions
|> on the type of NIC I should use?
|
|
| Almost any "normal" NIC will be fine. I'm using mostly Realtek-based
| (RTL8139) and Intel (8255) cards wo problems.
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Hoyer wrote:
| On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
|>|
|>| 10/100? There are less Gigabit types that are supported, yet,
|>| but then the reason for that should be pretty obvious.
|>|
|>| Anyway, you generally can't go wrong with 3Com.
"Hakim Z. Singhji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
> | Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
> |
> |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |> Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Hi Everyone,
> |>
> |> I am building a gateway/router from a i3
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
> |
> | 10/100? There are less Gigabit types that are supported, yet,
> | but then the reason for that should be pretty obvious.
> |
> | Anyway, you generally can't go wrong with 3Com. That said,
> | I've never had trouble with 3Com, SiS, DEC/Intel, ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Hi Everyone,
|>
|> I am building a gateway/router from a i386 300Mhz, 32MB RAM, 5GB hda and
|> ~ I need to buy the NIC cards. I
Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone,
I am building a gateway/router from a i386 300Mhz, 32MB RAM, 5GB hda and
~ I need to buy the NIC cards. I wanted to have three interface
connection points to my gateway/router. Does anyone have any suggestions
on t
The last two lines from dmesg:
IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding
enabled, default to deny, logging disabled
ip_fw_ctl: invalid command
Well, I've been having the same exact problem as Constatine posted, so when
I got home tonite and looked up the last erro
st a simplified
rc.firewall just for gateways?
From: Constantine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marc Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Derrick Ryalls
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD gateway
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:18:01 -0500
Marc Perisa wrote:
Derrick Ryalls
Marc Perisa wrote:
Derrick Ryalls wrote:
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does not want
to work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD
computer, fxp0 for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to
FreeBSD, so I am confused what the difference betw
Derrick Ryalls wrote:
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does
not want to
work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD
computer, fxp0
for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to FreeBSD, so I am
confused what the difference between gateways and ro
> Hello!
> I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does
> not want to
> work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD
> computer, fxp0
> for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to FreeBSD, so I am
> confused what the difference between gateways and routers is
47 matches
Mail list logo
