Kevin Stevens wrote:
On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 16:40 US/Pacific, Bill Moran wrote:
See
/usr/share/doc/papers/diskperf.ascii.gz
on your system. This is the authoritative resource as to why those
settings
are they way they are.
?? Sure that's the correct doc? It involves throughput tests
On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 16:40 US/Pacific, Bill Moran wrote:
See
/usr/share/doc/papers/diskperf.ascii.gz
on your system. This is the authoritative resource as to why those
settings
are they way they are.
?? Sure that's the correct doc? It involves throughput tests of
different disk syst
Kevin Stevens wrote:
Also, why is "up to a factor of three in throughput" lost over the 10%
setting? Is that another allusion to space optimization going into
effect, or is there something else happening? I guess I don't understand
the ramifications of the minfree setting. Any suggestions or re
You're right, dedicating that much space to nothing is pretty pointless.
What I did was I edited /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h and changed:
#define MINFREE 8
to
#define MINFREE 0
and then recompiled the kernel and set my /home partition to use 0% free
space with tunefs. Now I get to
