Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> Forgive me if I'm confused here, but... > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > > Here's a sample of that, from Mutt. I replaced the company name in > > > the banner with [companyName]. > > > > > > 220 webshielde250.[companyName] WebShielde250/SMTP Ready. > > >

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
Forgive me if I'm confused here, but... On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > Here's a sample of that, from Mutt. I replaced the company name in > > the banner with [companyName]. > > > > 220 webshielde250.[companyName] WebShielde250/SMTP Ready. > > EHLO kirk.dlee.

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Gary wrote: > > Here is what I am thinking... 1. You mentioned you can send via other > > MUAs, pine, etc, so I am inclined to think that your SMTP auth is set up > > properly in Sendmail... 2. Given this, I still think it could be a Mutt > > problem.. I

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Gary wrote: > Here is what I am thinking... 1. You mentioned you can send via other > MUAs, pine, etc, so I am inclined to think that your SMTP auth is set up > properly in Sendmail... 2. Given this, I still think it could be a Mutt > problem.. I think you

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:05:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > These are the lines that look potentially relevant from my .muttrc: > > set edit_hdrs # let me edit the message header when composing Okay, thanks. > > > So I see it as a three-pronged problem: (1) Web

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:40:39PM -0500, Gary wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Gary wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > > > > > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PRO

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:08:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Gary wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > > > > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AUTH=<> > > > > > whereas mail generated from Pine or

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Gary wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > > > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AUTH=<> > > > > whereas mail generated from Pine or a Windows mailer looks like > > > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > In oth

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AUTH=<> > > > whereas mail generated from Pine or a Windows mailer looks like > > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > In other words, the "AUTH=<>" only appears in Mutt-generated mail. >

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Doug Lee
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:37:41AM -0500, Gary wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:25:59PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > > > I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send > > mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus > > > The difference is

Re: Empty AUTH=<> in SMTP from Mutt message causing refused mail

2003-09-08 Thread Gary
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:25:59PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote: > I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send > mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus > The difference is that Mutt-generated messages' SMTP stream contains a > line like >