Re: Curious sound problem in 5.2.1-R

2004-03-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Doug Poland wrote: Thanks Aaron, that's all I needed to do. If you don't mind, how does a mere mortal determine that the snd_ich.ko is the module for an Intel ICH5 82801EB sound chip? i'm quite sure i figured it out the "long" way. However, it was quick and dirty, and should work on any sys

Re: Curious sound problem in 5.2.1-R

2004-03-03 Thread Aaron Peterson
>> or alternatively add this to your /boot/loader.conf >> >> snd_ich_load="YES" >> >> then run "kldload snd_ich.ko" as root... >> >> adding to loader.conf makes the proper sound driver load at boot, the >> kldload command loads it from the command line so you don't have to >> reboot. >> > Thanks Aa

Re: Curious sound problem in 5.2.1-R

2004-03-03 Thread Doug Poland
Aaron Peterson said: >> Have you compiled the following in your kernel? >> >> device pcm >> device sbc > > or alternatively add this to your /boot/loader.conf > > snd_ich_load="YES" > > then run "kldload snd_ich.ko" as root... > > adding to loader.conf makes the proper sound driv

Re: Curious sound problem in 5.2.1-R

2004-03-03 Thread Doug Poland
Jorn Argelo said: > > Have you compiled the following in your kernel? > > device pcm > device sbc > No, I interpreted the handbook (16.2.1 Locating the Correct Device) as meaning sound support would be loaded as a kernel module. Also, device pcm doesn't exist in GENERIC or GEN

Re: Curious sound problem in 5.2.1-R

2004-03-03 Thread Aaron Peterson
> Have you compiled the following in your kernel? > > device pcm > device sbc or alternatively add this to your /boot/loader.conf snd_ich_load="YES" then run "kldload snd_ich.ko" as root... adding to loader.conf makes the proper sound driver load at boot, the kldload command l

Re: Curious sound problem in 5.2.1-R

2004-03-03 Thread Jorn Argelo
Have you compiled the following in your kernel? device pcm device sbc Cheers, Jorn On 3/3/2004, "Doug Poland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello, > >I'd like to preface this with the statement that I'm a long-time 4.x user but >brand-new >to the 5.x series. Also, I'm not su