-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2010 18:57:11, Polytropon wrote:
>> I don't know where these 'do not mix ports and packages' warnings come
>> > from, but I suspect it's from people who think that they're different :)
> I think it may have come from PC-BSD, taking into mind
Please let me add this:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 03:37:14 +1000 (EST), Ian Smith wrote:
> The only difference is that a package is a port built with its default
> options. Sometimes that might not be suitable and you'll want to make
> it with other options. One way to tell if something was installe
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 317, Issue 9, Message: 26
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:52:54 -0400 Glen Barber wrote:
> On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> > --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
> >> there is no
> >> differentiation to the
On Friday 02 July 2010, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
> > Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
> > locally compiled "port"?
>
> portmaster -f -a
>
> > Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
>
> Be prepared to answer hund
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> However, your comment seems to be in disagreement with online
> warnings of "do not mix 'pkg_add' packages with 'make' ports".
>
> My original question's intention was to prevent me from
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my
> 'pkg_add' installed packages using ports and eventually they will
> all be
> "Chris" == Chris Stankevitz writes:
Chris> Thank you, pressing "O" is indeed easier than TAB, ENTER.
Chris> Unfortunately, I already pressed TAB, ENTER about a hundred
Chris> times. The build is now going. Hopefully any extra "TAB, ENTER"
Chris> sequences I made will be forgotten by portm
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Chris> Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options"
> questions. To take the default option you must press
> "TAB, ENTER" to each query. Have fun!
>
> I just hit the letter "O" for "OK".
Randal,
Thank you, pressing "O" is indeed easier than TAB,
> "Chris" == Chris Stankevitz writes:
Chris> Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" questions. To take the
default option you must press "TAB, ENTER" to each query. Have fun!
Chris> Chris
Chris> TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB,
Chris> ENTER, TAB, ENTE
On 7/1/10 7:27 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
locally compiled "port"?
portmaster -f -a
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" ques
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
> locally compiled "port"?
portmaster -f -a
> Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" questions. To take the default
option you mus
On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using ports and eventually the
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
> there is no
> differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using ports and eventually they will all be converted over
to 'make'.
On 7/1/10 5:31 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed
and 0 "ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally
compiled "port"?
Ideally the proc
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed and 0
"ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally compiled
"port"?
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
15 matches
Mail list logo
