On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 30 January 2013, at 05:16, Fbsd8 wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will no
On 30 January 2013, at 05:16, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
>>> Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick.
Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
It starts the boot process fine
On 1/29/2013 10:25 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
What is the system you are using? What external devices does it have
built-in support for? In the absence of any data - how about trying an
external hard drive?
Why not remove the hard drive, use another system to put FreeBSD on the
drive, and put
On 29 January 2013, at 20:25, d...@safeport.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
>>> Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
It starts
On 29 January 2013, at 07:18, Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
>> bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
>> It starts the boot process fine and get
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:16:14 -0800
Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have a relatively old machine that I am trying to boot 9.1 on. The
> bios will not boot from USB stick. I am using an external CD drive.
> It starts the boot process fine and gets to the Bootstrap loader
> message with revision 1.1. The
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:07, Winston wrote:
> I tried to boot via a serial console, so I modified/added the
> following config files:
> ---
> /boot/loader.conf:
> boot_multicons="YES"
> boot_serial="YES"
> console="comconsole"
> ---
> /boot.conf
Good news and bad news:
Good News: System seems to have recovered. Booting into single user
mode and running fsck worked great for / and /var, but did nothing for
my /usr partition with all my data. After letting fsck run on my /usr
partition for 4 days, the raid controller appeared to stall
I do not have the FIX-IT CD or another FreeBSD machine.
Is there another fellow FreeBSD'er in the Bay Area, CA that can
volunteer to help me troubleshoot the card as described below (e.g. plug
in the card and break to debugger to gather info)? I can drive over to
your place or you can come ove
Please see my reply below:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:12:51 -0800
Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a summary of my problem so far:
Server was idle (e.g. absolutely no processes running aside from
csh, ttyv0 and ps) when power was cut; server reports a problem mou
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:44:46 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:12:51 -0800
> Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here's a summary of my problem so far:
[..]
> To summarize:
>
> 1. See if you have disk activity when fsck seems to be stuck.
>
>
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:12:51 -0800
Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a summary of my problem so far:
>
> Server was idle (e.g. absolutely no processes running aside from
> csh, ttyv0 and ps) when power was cut; server reports a problem mounting
> /usr partition upon reboot.
>
> I
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:35:35 -0800
Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's some questions:
>
> If the server was idle (e.g. absolutely no processes running aside from
> login shell and terminal and no disk access occurring) does it make
> sense that the filesystem would have had a prob
Here's some questions:
If the server was idle (e.g. absolutely no processes running aside from
login shell and terminal and no disk access occurring) does it make
sense that the filesystem would have had a problem after being
improperly unmounted?
Also, how long should an 'fsck' on a 500GB par
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 01:09:22 -0800
Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I booted into single-user mode and ran 'fsck' - the latest output to the
> terminal says:
>
> FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN
> /dev/da0s1e
> Last Mounted on /usr
> Phase 1 - check blocks an
I booted into single-user mode and ran 'fsck' - the latest output to the
terminal says:
FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN
/dev/da0s1e
Last Mounted on /usr
Phase 1 - check blocks and sizes
FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY
Will fsck continue attempting to fix t
Thank you!
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:49:50 -0800
Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting the following error message during startup:
/usr: mount pending error: blocks 16 files 1
I'm guessing this orrcured due to a shutdown during background fsck of
the filesyste
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:49:50 -0800
Rishi Chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting the following error message during startup:
>
> /usr: mount pending error: blocks 16 files 1
>
> I'm guessing this orrcured due to a shutdown during background fsck of
> the filesystem.
Not necessarily dur
20 matches
Mail list logo
