On 21/07/2012 22:06, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
I assume you have compiled the bootblocks as per the instruction in the
handbook.
Second, do you have more than one serial port on the box because FreeBSD can
only work its serial console magic on only one port at a time.
If you redirect your
I assume you have compiled the bootblocks as per the instruction in the
handbook.
Second, do you have more than one serial port on the box because FreeBSD can
only work its serial console magic on only one port at a time.
If you redirect your IPMI serial console or just a normal serial console,
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:54:18 -0600, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone else noticed a similar odd behavior with AMD64 and 9.0
prerelease (as well as RCs and betas)?
On my 12 core (2*4162EE) the whole system just freezes quite often
without any warning, without any messages being logged
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:54:18 +0200 (EET)
j...@iki.fi (Jukka A. Ukkonen) wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone else noticed a similar odd behavior with AMD64 and 9.0
> prerelease (as well as RCs and betas)?
Yes, I've seen a few of these myself, under both of the RCs and
PRERELEASE. No idea what the
On 11/19/11 03:54, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone else noticed a similar odd behavior with AMD64 and 9.0
prerelease (as well as RCs and betas)?
On my 12 core (2*4162EE) the whole system just freezes quite often
without any warning, without any messages being logged. Neither is
there a
On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:23 PM, wayne mitchell wrote:
> installing is fine (from package - not port)
> starting rosegarden from gui menu - nothing happens
> executing rosegarden from CLI returns error:
> [ /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: shared object "libQt3Support.so.4" not found,
> required by "rosegarden"
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:58:49PM -0500, Depo Catcher wrote:
>
>
> On 8/9/2010 4:14 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
> >Polytropon writes:
> >
> >
> >> >I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I
> >> fetch
> >> > are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself?
>On 8/9/2010 4:14 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>> Polytropon writes:
>>
>>
>>> >I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
>>> > are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
>>> > amd64 too?
>>>
>>> Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and t
On 8/9/2010 4:14 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Polytropon writes:
>I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
> are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
> amd64 too?
Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and target platform
is
Polytropon writes:
> > I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
> > are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
> > amd64 too?
>
> Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and target platform
> is amd64, and so is the resulting binary co
On Monday 09 of August 2010 23:19:31 Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
> are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
> amd64 too?
Of cource! When you "make" them they are compiled using the amd64 libraries
and
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:19:31 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
> are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
> amd64 too?
Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and target platform
is amd64, and so is th
> "Gene" == Gene writes:
Gene> I'm still working out just what everything does, but the one thing I've
Gene> noticed is that it doesn't address raidz at all. Can anyone direct me to
any
Gene> docs that might help? Or does anyone know where in the wiki page's
intructions
Gene> raidz might b
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:19:31PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
>> What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
>> You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
>
> That looks like a handy tool. Is there a versi
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:19:31PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
> You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
That looks like a handy tool. Is there a version that will run on
FreeBSD?
--
Chad Perrin [ original co
What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
The revision 3 and above system boards can run 64bit OS's.
Also if you're CPU is one of the following a a BIOS upgrade/setting
may enable the full set of processor feature
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:30:48PM -0600, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 3/5/2010 6:28 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > The amd64 arch installer for 8.0-RELEASE fails to start on a ThinkPad T60
> > with an Intel Centrino Core Duo. What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > error message:
> >
> > CPU doesn't support
On 3/5/2010 6:28 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> The amd64 arch installer for 8.0-RELEASE fails to start on a ThinkPad T60
> with an Intel Centrino Core Duo. What am I doing wrong?
>
> error message:
>
> CPU doesn't support long mode
>
You have a CPU that does not have 64-bit extensions. You nee
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 10:17:05 schrob ms80:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
> machine.
>
> The computers specs are:
>
> cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
> board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
> ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
> hdd: 2xMaxtor STM31000528AS
> nic: 4x I
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 14:37:16 schrob Michael Powell:
> ms80 wrote:
[snip]
>
> There seems to be a general feeling the newer AMD processors don't much
> care for higher memory voltages. Try lowering your voltages and see if it
> helps.
>
> I am successfully using this board with the CPU
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 14:03:06 schrob David N:
[snip]
>
> What power supply do you have?
> How many watts? brand?
>
> If you have insufficient power, it may cause the system to become unstable.
>
> Regards
> David N
I tested with an Enermax EPR425AWT Pro82+ II, 425W wich was the psu I b
ms80 wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> I'm using two of this: OCZ3P1333LVAM4GK
> (OCZ DDR3 AMD Edition, rated for 1333MHz at 1.65V). My Board is rated for
> 1066 - 1600 MHz memory, and neither the website nor the manual say
> anything about limitations with memory. Anyway: I didn't ov
On 6 February 2010 22:18, ms80 wrote:
> Am Saturday 06 February 2010 11:38:25 schrob Michael Powell:
>> ms80 wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
>> > machine.
>> >
>> > The computers specs are:
>> >
>> > cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
>> > board: Gi
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 11:38:25 schrob Michael Powell:
> ms80 wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
> > machine.
> >
> > The computers specs are:
> >
> > cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
> > board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
> > ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
>
ms80 wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
> machine.
>
> The computers specs are:
>
> cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
> board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
> ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
> hdd: 2xMaxtor STM31000528AS
> nic: 4x Intel(R) PRO/1000
[snip]
>
>
> So here
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:57:17 +0100
Frank Staals wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Yesterday I wanted to update my system currently running 8.0-RC1
> amd64 to the latest 8-STABLE release. However buildworld failed. I
> found out the problem seems to pop up when trying to build the lib32
> libraries. If
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:27:54 -0800 (PST)
Clayton Wilhelm da Rosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i made the download of FreeBSD amd64 and i wanna know if the amd64 is
> the same as x86_x64.
Yes, it's the same. amd64, x86_64 and x64 are all the same architecture.
--
Bruce Cran
John Nielsen wrote:
There's always the build logs on pointyhat:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/
And some reports here:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/index.html
These are not the droids I'm looking for.
As I remember the page, it has three columns: the port name, the
(color-co
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:19:47AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Somewhere in *.freebsd.org is a page that lists which ports run
> natively on amd64 and what the status is for the others. I've seen it,
> I have it bookmarked in a place that is currently unavailable, and I
> can't find it by
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:19:47 Robert Huff wrote:
> Somewhere in *.freebsd.org is a page that lists which ports run
> natively on amd64 and what the status is for the others. I've seen it,
> I have it bookmarked in a place that is currently unavailable, and I
> can't find it by hand. A
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
> Dell PE 1950
>
> FreeBSD 7.2 amd64
>
>
> boot from disc01 into sysinstall, do our regular setup, reboot, and df
> shows only / and /devfs. f
>
> stab has /usr and /var missing.
>
> so we go into sysinstall, slices are correct:
>
> Disk name:
On 2009-06-30 02:13:11, Roland Smith wrote:
>
> The page says it does.
Forgive me for being cynical but after countless experiences, I rarely believe
such statements any more!
> > Virtualbox + VMGL seems the most likely candidate at the moment -
>
> From the abovementioned page: "VMGL is availa
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:59:04PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2009-06-29 23:34:08, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:14:17PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
>
On 2009-06-29 23:34:08, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:14:17PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
> > OpenGL support is required?
>
> Depends on what your definitions of a virtual mac
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:14:17PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hello.
>
> What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
> OpenGL support is required?
Depends on what your definitions of a virtual machine and OpenGl support
are. :-)
All CPU level virtual ma
Outback Dingo wrote:
I think maybe what he was expecting was a FreeBSD IA64 install on the box,
but they installed AMD64 instead
*Correctly* installed.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
I think maybe what he was expecting was a FreeBSD IA64 install on the box,
but they installed AMD64 instead
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is
>> identifying itself as amd64 and not i6
so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is identifying
itself as amd64 and not i686?
because this intel CPU is 64-bit AMD compatible (x86-64 standard).
the rules changed and now intel make AMD-compatible CPUs
___
freebsd-questi
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:56:26PM -0400, kalin m wrote:
> hi all...
>
> i have dilemma.
>
> i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i
> mentioned that it should be 64 bit.
> now they when i get into the machine i get:
> srv391# uname -a
> FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:56:26PM -0400, kalin m wrote:
> hi all...
>
> i have dilemma.
>
> i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i
> mentioned that it should be 64 bit.
> now they when i get into the machine i get:
> srv391# uname -a
> FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.
kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i have dilemma.
i asked a hosting faclity to set up freebsd 7 on new server. and i
mentioned that it should be 64 bit.
now they when i get into the machine i get:
srv391# uname -a
FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun
Feb 24 10:35
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:35:34 +
"Colin Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/03/2008, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Everything I've every seen about this suggests that amd64 is
> > faster on a few applications, such as mp3 encoding, but generally
> > there is very little difference,
On 06/03/2008, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Everything I've every seen about this suggests that amd64 is faster on
> a few applications, such as mp3 encoding, but generally there is very
> little difference, on average, across desktop applications. Do you have
> any measurements to support
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:47:53 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> of RAM, and I seldom use more than half of that. Mind you, I'm
> >> using a simple window manager not a desktop environment with lots
> >> of bells & whistles.
> >>
> >> I suspect binaries on i386 will be somew
Thanks everyone, based on the info I am returning the nvidia card and
getting an R4xx instead (found an X850 for under $80 still sold; seems to be
well enough supported). I still want to try amd64; other limitations do not
bother me that much (I do not care for wine or win32 codecs).
__
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, alive wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:13:03 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:22:35PM +0100, alive wrote:
> Thanks.
> Do you by any chance have a link to supported cards?
http://www.sapphiretech.com/us/products/products_overview.php?gpid=59&grp=2
Support for r300 based cards is coming as well.
> Do you know if this driver supports Composite? Ope
Thanks.
Do you by any chance have a link to supported cards?
Do you know if this driver supports Composite? OpenGL?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:32:06 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:29:51PM +0100, alive wrote:
>> > Any ATI card up to and including the 9250 (rv
On 3/5/08, Isaac Mushinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/08, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> > > I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> > > installing FreeBSD/arch, but now re
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:29:51PM +0100, alive wrote:
> > Any ATI card up to and including the 9250 (rv280) is fully supported on
> > amd64, 3D and all. (I know because I've got one :-)
> Oh, is that so? Could you please tell me how you got it to work? Because
> I've got GREAT issues getting *ANY
of RAM, and I seldom use more than half of that. Mind you, I'm using a
simple window manager not a desktop environment with lots of bells &
whistles.
I suspect binaries on i386 will be somewhat smaller. But amd64 has more
registers which might give some speed advantages. I haven't tested it, but
On 3/5/08, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> > I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> > installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> > problems.
> >
> > My nvid
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:13:03 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
>> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
>> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
>> prob
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> problems.
>
> My nvidia card will not be of much use (GeForce 8500GT), since nvidia
Em Wednesday 05 March 2008 02:36:33 Isaac Mushinsky escreveu:
> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> problems.
>
> My nvidia card will not be of much use (GeForce 8500GT), since
> nvidia-dri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local]# uname -aFreeBSD web1.machine.net 6.2-RELEASE
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 6 22:37:33 CST 2008 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/web1 amd64
you did all right. you installed 64-bit kernel on 64-bit capable machine.
amd64 is just a standard for 64-bit
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:08:31 -0500
David T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am worried that I installed the 64 bit version of FreeBSD with an
> amd kernel on an Intel i386 box.
> Is there something wrong when I see the following:
Intel produce CPUs that are compatible with amd64. If yours wasn'
On Dec 22, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
AMD64 CPUs are backwards compatible with i386; they boot in 16-bit
real mode and only get switched into 64-bit 'long mode' by the kernel
later on. Since both i386 and amd64 start booting in the same way,
there's no need for separate bootloaders.
snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
hi,
i've FBSD/amd64 62Rp9 installed. kernel & world are my own builds
from latest cvsup.
on boot I see:
"FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader"
odd. i'd expect a native loader ...
checking in,
/usr/src/sys/boot > ls
Makefile alpha/arm/ efi/ forth
>
> 7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
> partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
> Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
>
> System is a SA6i RAID5-array with 6x300GB disks. Possibly I need to
> e
Brian wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to bo
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
Sys
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
System is a SA6i RAID5-array w
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
System is a SA6i RAID5-array with 6x300GB disks. Possibly
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:58:34AM -0400, Arend P. van der Veen wrote:
> - Will the AMD64 based FreeBSD 6.2 distribution with applications such as
> Postgresql, Apache, Python, Tomcat and SBCL be able to take advantage of
> the 64-bit quad processor?
Yes, if you compile them natively on AMD64.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:58:34AM -0400, Arend P. van der Veen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a general question.
>
> We have access to some new AMD64 based Dell Servers with 2 Core Duo
> Xeons. We are currently using i386 Dell Servers with a core duo
> processor. I recall from my MS Windows da
On Tue, 29 May 2007 08:35:24 -0700 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Hello All:
> We have a system that was built with the amd64 source (uname -a below).
> I was attempting to make a custom kernel and the make kept failing so I
> decided to try the make against GENERIC. It fails at the same pla
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, RW wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 + (UTC)
> > Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>> You should be able to upgrade
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about:
>
> portupgrade -afR
>
> Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one
> being reinstalled?
I can't parse your question, but I think you are confusing the 'R'
option with the 'r' option. You should also note that both
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about:
portupgrade -afR
Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one
being reinstalled?
If you wanted, you could use:
portmana
On Fri, 18 May 2007 13:31:52 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about:
>
>portupgrade -afR
>
> Wouldn't that force everything including ports that depend on the one
> being reinstalled?
If you wanted, you could use:
portmanager -u -l -f
That will update and
On Fri, 18 May 2007, RW wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld,
buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to
recomp
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:39:35 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > You should be able to upgrade the system by a routine buildworld,
> > buildkernel ... type operation, but beware that you will need to
> > recompile all of your ports
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
I have a server that, at first, required 5.5 because of the MTA that was
running on the server. It no longer is running that particular MTA
anymore. I need to upgrade the server to release 6.2.
Is it just a matter of changing the re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Duane Hill wrote:
>
> I have a server that, at first, required 5.5 because of the MTA that was
> running on the server. It no longer is running that particular MTA
> anymore. I need to upgrade the server to release 6.2.
>
> Is it just a matter of c
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:23:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FreeBSD 6.x AMD64 runs for more than a year on my 'AMD Athlon 3000+' now.
>
> It runs very stable with one exception: accessing ext2/ext3 filesystems
> often hang the system completely.
> That is a phenomenon that I did
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.x AMD64 runs for more than a year on my 'AMD Athlon 3000+' now.
It runs very stable with one exception: accessing ext2/ext3 filesystems
often hang the system completely.
That is a phenomenon that I did not see with FreeBSD 6.x x86.
Apart from that I am very happy with it.
Regards
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:41:46PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Michael S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I am getting my (first) Athlon 64 x 2 today or
> > tomorrow and was wondering whether I should stick with
> > the reliable x86 or try the AMD64 port.
> >
> > Any performance penalt
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 21:30:14 Michael S wrote:
> Good day all.
>
> I am getting my (first) Athlon 64 x 2 today or
> tomorrow and was wondering whether I should stick with
> the reliable x86 or try the AMD64 port.
I'd try it but ...
> Any performance penalties when running x86 FreeBSD on
>
In response to Michael S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am getting my (first) Athlon 64 x 2 today or
> tomorrow and was wondering whether I should stick with
> the reliable x86 or try the AMD64 port.
>
> Any performance penalties when running x86 FreeBSD on
> a 64-bit machine?
Performance is equiva
On Mar 10, 2007, at 11:11 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 10), Garrett Cooper said:
Just bought and built a new PC, comes with an Conroe-based Core 2
Duo, Realtek 8169 Gigabit chipset, JbMicron PATA / SATA RAID
controller, and the like. Now, I can boot up the FreeBSD livecd
perfe
In the last episode (Mar 10), Garrett Cooper said:
> Just bought and built a new PC, comes with an Conroe-based Core 2
> Duo, Realtek 8169 Gigabit chipset, JbMicron PATA / SATA RAID
> controller, and the like. Now, I can boot up the FreeBSD livecd
> perfectly fine, but when it comes to adding
So, in an effort to get my system up and running I was wondering if
someone could provide me with either a link to a v7 ISO available
somewhere, or directions on how to make a FreeBSD LiveCD (I have 2
other IA32 systems kicking around I can use for building stuff :)..).
There are 7.0-CURRENT sna
"Coen Watstaatervoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed FreeBSD 6.1 on a new Dual AMD Opeteron HE server, during the
> installation the keyboard works fine. But when you plug in the keyboard
> after a reboot (without the keyboard attached) the keyboard won't work any
> more. I'm doing t
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 06:54:44PM +0200, Cor van Wandelen wrote:
> I experience instability with FreeBSD-AMD64 using ext2/ext3 filesystems.
> Sometimes reading and writing these filesystems work without any problems and
> the next time the whole system hangs with the only option resetting the pc.
I experience instability with FreeBSD-AMD64 using ext2/ext3 filesystems.
Sometimes reading and writing these filesystems work without any problems and
the next time the whole system hangs with the only option resetting the pc.
Nevertheless I use it because overall it seems to be a lot faster, but I
I experience instability with FreeBSD-AMD64 using ext2/ext3 filesystems.
Sometimes reading and writing these filesystems work without any problems and
the next time the whole system hangs with the only option resetting the pc.
Nevertheless I use it because overall it seems to be a lot faster, but I
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 08:09:27AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Can anybody on this list indicate what kind of stability they have seen
> with AMD64 systems using FreeBSD (the 64-bit binaries)? How about the
> majority of PORTS in the tree?
Stability of amd64 is excellent.
# uptime
7:4
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 14:09, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Can anybody on this list indicate what kind of stability they have seen
> with AMD64 systems using FreeBSD (the 64-bit binaries)? How about the
> majority of PORTS in the tree?
The problems with amd64 are more to do with whether the
On 9/5/06, Thomas T. Veldhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anybody on this list indicate what kind of stability they have seen
with AMD64 systems using FreeBSD (the 64-bit binaries)? How about the
majority of PORTS in the tree?
I realize this question will solicit relatively subjective respo
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:26:54PM -0400, stan wrote:
> I'm trying to do a buildworld (AMD64) on a Sum Ultra 40, but it's failing
> like this:
>
> cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DRRESTORE -DRESCUE -c
> /usr/src/sbin/restore
> /restore.c
> cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DRRESTORE -DRESCU
Michael Collette wrote:
I don't have any bias towards either company. My focus is spending my
money on what will actually work. Starting to feel like I'll be
looking at the Pentium-D processors. I've got a laptop with a dual
core Pentium and it works pretty sweet.
AMD 64bit processors w
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 01:42, Michael Collette wrote:
> Andy Reitz wrote:
> > In 64-bit mode, that does appear to be the case. However, it sounds like
> > you could purchase an AMD64-based processor, and have everythign work
> > fine in 32-bit mode. Then later down the road, as the software evol
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:35:15 -0700
Michael Collette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bit of a dilemma here with my primary desktop machine suddenly up and
> dieing on me. I'm now in the market to slap together a new PC
>
> I've started with looking at picking up an AMD64 based system. After
> Goo
Andy Reitz wrote:
In 64-bit mode, that does appear to be the case. However, it sounds like
you could purchase an AMD64-based processor, and have everythign work fine
in 32-bit mode. Then later down the road, as the software evolves, you
could upgrade FreeBSD to be 64-bit and be set.
Just a thoug
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Michael Collette wrote:
> Any and all feedback is appreciated. For as nice as the AMD64 processor
> may be, sounds like things are a ways off before the software has fully
> caught up.
In 64-bit mode, that does appear to be the case. However, it sounds like
you could purchas
Mark Kane wrote:
> Hi. I'm using an Athlon64 3000+ (and the amd64 version of FreeBSD) as my
main workstation. I also have another workstation with the same CPU
running the i386 version. Here's my opinions:
Flash - The 32 bit Linux binary of Flash 7 works in linux-firefox or
linux-opera fine in
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006, at 22:35:15 -0700, Michael Collette wrote:
> Bit of a dilemma here with my primary desktop machine suddenly up and
> dieing on me. I'm now in the market to slap together a new PC
>
> I've started with looking at picking up an AMD64 based system. After
> Googling around fo
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
You can always run the 32bit i386 version on the AMD motherboard if you
find out that the above stuff doesn't work so well. I don't use FreeBSD
as a desktop so I cannot comment on that part but amd64 issues with
flash etc does not mean you have to buy a P4 or
On Jun 19, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Michael Collette wrote:
Bit of a dilemma here with my primary desktop machine suddenly up
and dieing on me. I'm now in the market to slap together a new PC
I've started with looking at picking up an AMD64 based system.
After Googling around for a while I sti
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
