On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
> it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: bridge. at device 31.0 on pci0
> isa0: on isab0
>
> Please let me know if you need more info, or you have
Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: on isab0
Please let me know if you need more info, or you have any advice on what
this could be.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Thanks fo
Thanks for that, I'm sorry I didn't mention what version I downloaded
earlier. I will reply once I test it out.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ia64 is for Itanium processor . Therefore ia64 can NOT work on Intel
> Pentium series process
ia64 is for Itanium processor . Therefore ia64 can NOT work on Intel Pentium
series processors .
Their architectures are different .
You should download amd64 ISO . amd64 is for both Intel 64 bits and AMD 64
bits pocessors
compatible to each other .
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Gal Lis wro
Well that explains a lot. I will try it and report back. Thanks to everyone
for your help so far!
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Adam Vandemore wrote:
> Gal Lis wrote:
>
>> They should definitely support it. My workstation has an Intel E5320 quad
>> core, and the M600 has a 5400 series chip, b
Gal Lis wrote:
They should definitely support it. My workstation has an Intel E5320 quad
core, and the M600 has a 5400 series chip, but I can't remember which one
exactly. They should definitely be able to handle it.
I downloaded the 7.1 ia64, maybe there is something else I should be
downloading
They should definitely support it. My workstation has an Intel E5320 quad
core, and the M600 has a 5400 series chip, but I can't remember which one
exactly. They should definitely be able to handle it.
I downloaded the 7.1 ia64, maybe there is something else I should be
downloading?
On Wed, Mar 18
You said 32-bits 6.4 could be loaded .
A question coming to mind is
Can your processor handle 64-bits ?
Please check this issue .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol sanliturk
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> I guess that shows just how unexperienced I am with all of this.
>
>
anyway - you SOMEHOW got into that list and not linux one. So you must
know something about FreeBSD anyway :)
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Gal Lis wrote:
I guess that shows just how unexperienced I am with all of this.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Ross Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6
I guess that shows just how unexperienced I am with all of this.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
>
>> Sorry to ask these mundane questions, but I'm a linux novice.
>
>
> Linux != FreeBSD
>
__
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:28:22PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> > Sorry to ask these mundane questions, but I'm a linux novice.
>
> Linux != FreeBSD
But, the OP will still probably get better information on the
FreeBSD lists than over there.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Sorry to ask these mundane questions, but I'm a linux novice.
Linux != FreeBSD
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Gal Lis wrote:
I burned another copy, using another ISO whose checksum comes out ok, and it still isn't loading. What else can I be doing wrong?
From: Bill Moran
To: Gal Lis
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:30:09 AM
Subject: Re
I burned another copy, using another ISO whose checksum comes out ok, and it
still isn't loading. What else can I be doing wrong?
From: Bill Moran
To: Gal Lis
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:30:09 AM
Subject: Re: 7.1 64 bi
Thank you! I got have another ISO that matches, I'm going to burn and test it.
From: Bill Moran
To: Gal Lis
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:30:09 AM
Subject: Re: 7.1 64 bit
In response to Gal Lis :
> Hi Frank,
> Tha
In response to Gal Lis :
> Hi Frank,
> Thanks for the reply, I see what to compare the checksums to on the site,
> but I have a Windows machine. Any hints on how to check?
http://www.pc-tools.net/win32/md5sums/
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.co
s
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:23:52 PM
Subject: Re: 7.1 64 bit
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:08:25PM -0700, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> Hi Frank and Glen,
> I tried both disks on my workstation, and 6.4 started up, but
> there was nothing from 7.1, so maybe my copy
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:08:25PM -0700, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> Hi Frank and Glen,
> I tried both disks on my workstation, and 6.4 started up, but
> there was nothing from 7.1, so maybe my copy is bad. I burned
> it using imgburn, and i also have magiciso. How can I check to
> ma
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Hello,
> I have tried installing 7.1 64 bit onto a Dell M600 in an M1000E enclosure
> for a client, and the 7.1 disk does not boot. Is there anything you can
> recommend? I have installed 6.4 32 bit onto it with no issues.
>
Can you try to boot
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:25:34AM -0700, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have tried installing 7.1 64 bit onto a Dell M600 in an M1000E
> enclosure for a client, and the 7.1 disk does not boot. Is there
> anything you can recommend? I have installed 6.4 32 bit onto it with
> no issues.
>
>
> Th
20 matches
Mail list logo
