#x27;ing.
Thanks!
> From: bobbyjwal...@live.com
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:06:02 -0500
> Subject: Re: 7.1 and wireless with ural
>
>
> No I only had 7.1 on CD, but I've burned 8 onto disc and will upgrade
> when I get home tonight.
No I only had 7.1 on CD, but I've burned 8 onto disc and will upgrade
when I get home tonight.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 20, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Alberto Mijares
wrote:
And in my rc.conf I have this defined:
ifconfig_ural0="wpa DHCP"
hostname="my.home.server"
You must create
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:43:18PM -0400, Bobby Walker wrote:
>
> Hey list, I've searched and searched for a solution to this problem and I
> can't find one.
>
> I've got the wireless nic setup, its a Linksys WUSB54G v2.
>
I have a Linksys WUSB54GC, and use the "rum" driver, check out the ma
> And in my rc.conf I have this defined:
> ifconfig_ural0="wpa DHCP"
> hostname="my.home.server"
>
You must create a virtual interface (i.e. wlan0) and then configure it.
# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ural0
Read man(5) rc.conf and the handbook for more information. You are
using FreeBSD 8, do
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Fbsd1 wrote:
> APseudoUtopia wrote:
>>
>> My FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p3 system has gone down a few times in the last
>> two days. I'm trying to figure out why, but there is nothing in
>> /var/log/messages or dmesg about the incident.
>>
>> Here's the output from the `l
Could also be a PSU going out - unable to maintain the correct voltages.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, APseudoUtopia wrote:
> My FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p3 system has gone down a few times in the last
> two days. I'm trying to figure out why, but there is nothing in
> /var/log/messages or dmesg ab
APseudoUtopia wrote:
My FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p3 system has gone down a few times in the last
two days. I'm trying to figure out why, but there is nothing in
/var/log/messages or dmesg about the incident.
Here's the output from the `last` command:
User ttyp01.2.3.4Tue Apr 14 19:02 s
-Original Message-
From: APseudoUtopia [mailto:apseudouto...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 April 2009 20:23
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: 7.1 System Crashing
My FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p3 system has gone down a few times in the last
two days. I'm trying to figure out why, but there is nothing in
/va
In the last episode (Mar 20), Christoph Kukulies said:
> I did a pkg_add -r mysql60-server
> and then
>
> # mysql_install_db --user=mysql
> Installing MySQL system tables...
> 090320 17:11:24 [Note] Falcon: unable to open system data files.
> 090320 17:11:24 [Note] Falcon: creating new system data
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
> it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: bridge. at device 31.0 on pci0
> isa0: on isab0
>
> Please let me know if you need more info, or you have
Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: on isab0
Please let me know if you need more info, or you have any advice on what
this could be.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Thanks fo
Fbsd1 wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Fbsd1 wrote:
In 7.1 phpmyadmin now drops you into a logon screen.
How do I stop this function and always go to main menu screen?
That's nothing to do with the FreeBSD version -- phpMyAdmin works the
same on any platform.
To make phpMyAdmin auto-login to a D
Thanks for that, I'm sorry I didn't mention what version I downloaded
earlier. I will reply once I test it out.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ia64 is for Itanium processor . Therefore ia64 can NOT work on Intel
> Pentium series process
ia64 is for Itanium processor . Therefore ia64 can NOT work on Intel Pentium
series processors .
Their architectures are different .
You should download amd64 ISO . amd64 is for both Intel 64 bits and AMD 64
bits pocessors
compatible to each other .
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Gal Lis wro
Well that explains a lot. I will try it and report back. Thanks to everyone
for your help so far!
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Adam Vandemore wrote:
> Gal Lis wrote:
>
>> They should definitely support it. My workstation has an Intel E5320 quad
>> core, and the M600 has a 5400 series chip, b
Gal Lis wrote:
They should definitely support it. My workstation has an Intel E5320 quad
core, and the M600 has a 5400 series chip, but I can't remember which one
exactly. They should definitely be able to handle it.
I downloaded the 7.1 ia64, maybe there is something else I should be
downloading
They should definitely support it. My workstation has an Intel E5320 quad
core, and the M600 has a 5400 series chip, but I can't remember which one
exactly. They should definitely be able to handle it.
I downloaded the 7.1 ia64, maybe there is something else I should be
downloading?
On Wed, Mar 18
You said 32-bits 6.4 could be loaded .
A question coming to mind is
Can your processor handle 64-bits ?
Please check this issue .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol sanliturk
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> I guess that shows just how unexperienced I am with all of this.
>
>
anyway - you SOMEHOW got into that list and not linux one. So you must
know something about FreeBSD anyway :)
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Gal Lis wrote:
I guess that shows just how unexperienced I am with all of this.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Ross Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6
I guess that shows just how unexperienced I am with all of this.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
>
>> Sorry to ask these mundane questions, but I'm a linux novice.
>
>
> Linux != FreeBSD
>
__
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:28:22PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> > Sorry to ask these mundane questions, but I'm a linux novice.
>
> Linux != FreeBSD
But, the OP will still probably get better information on the
FreeBSD lists than over there.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Sorry to ask these mundane questions, but I'm a linux novice.
Linux != FreeBSD
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Gal Lis wrote:
I burned another copy, using another ISO whose checksum comes out ok, and it still isn't loading. What else can I be doing wrong?
From: Bill Moran
To: Gal Lis
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:30:09 AM
Subject: Re
I burned another copy, using another ISO whose checksum comes out ok, and it
still isn't loading. What else can I be doing wrong?
From: Bill Moran
To: Gal Lis
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:30:09 AM
Subject: Re: 7.1 64 bi
Thank you! I got have another ISO that matches, I'm going to burn and test it.
From: Bill Moran
To: Gal Lis
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:30:09 AM
Subject: Re: 7.1 64 bit
In response to Gal Lis :
> Hi Frank,
> Tha
In response to Gal Lis :
> Hi Frank,
> Thanks for the reply, I see what to compare the checksums to on the site,
> but I have a Windows machine. Any hints on how to check?
http://www.pc-tools.net/win32/md5sums/
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.co
s
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:23:52 PM
Subject: Re: 7.1 64 bit
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:08:25PM -0700, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> Hi Frank and Glen,
> I tried both disks on my workstation, and 6.4 started up, but
> there was nothing from 7.1, so maybe my copy
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:08:25PM -0700, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> Hi Frank and Glen,
> I tried both disks on my workstation, and 6.4 started up, but
> there was nothing from 7.1, so maybe my copy is bad. I burned
> it using imgburn, and i also have magiciso. How can I check to
> ma
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Hello,
> I have tried installing 7.1 64 bit onto a Dell M600 in an M1000E enclosure
> for a client, and the 7.1 disk does not boot. Is there anything you can
> recommend? I have installed 6.4 32 bit onto it with no issues.
>
Can you try to boot
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:25:34AM -0700, Gal Lis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have tried installing 7.1 64 bit onto a Dell M600 in an M1000E
> enclosure for a client, and the 7.1 disk does not boot. Is there
> anything you can recommend? I have installed 6.4 32 bit onto it with
> no issues.
>
>
> Th
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Fbsd1 wrote:
In 7.1 phpmyadmin now drops you into a logon screen.
How do I stop this function and always go to main menu screen?
That's nothing to do with the FreeBSD version -- phpMyAdmin works the
same on any platform.
To make phpMyAdmin auto-login to a DB, you need to
Fbsd1 wrote:
In 7.1 phpmyadmin now drops you into a logon screen.
How do I stop this function and always go to main menu screen?
That's nothing to do with the FreeBSD version -- phpMyAdmin works the
same on any platform.
To make phpMyAdmin auto-login to a DB, you need to use 'config'
authentic
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:43:42 -0600, Andrew Gould
wrote:
> I thought lame was one of the packages that couldn't be distributed in
> binary form due to license restrictions.
In the past, it really was. But I think it was possible to add it
via pkg_add. It's some time ago, but memory serves me right
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:08 PM, joel perry wrote:
> Attempting to pkg_add kde4 fails because the lame3.97_1.tgz is not located
> in the latest ftp location. I and many others would appreciate it if you
> would add lame to latest folder so that this package will install. It was
> previously avai
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 01:34:47 Arjan van der Oest wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you earlier, I have been out of the office
> for some time...
>
> > Does this one also have a link UP message after nfs mounting? If not,
>
> then
>
> > there's your culprit: network isn't up
Hi Mel,
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier, I have been out of the office
for some time...
> Does this one also have a link UP message after nfs mounting? If not,
then
> there's your culprit: network isn't up at mountcritremote time. You
should
> mark it 'late' in fstab
The UP message ca
van der Schaft
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Barber"
To: "Jim Pazarena" ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: 7.1 release / apache22 / php5
> stan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:52:10PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> >
On Friday 30 January 2009 04:36:04 Arjan van der Oest wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> >> - why does the system tries to mount the nfs filesystem from the
>
> fstab
>
> >> while nfs_client_enable has been set to no in rc.conf?
> >
> >Because there is no relation between the two. You could be using a 3rd
> >pa
m/ (Key ID: 07286F78) fingerprint: 2E9F
3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Arjan van der
Oest
Sent: vrijdag 30 januari 2009 14:36
To: Mel; freebsd-questions@free
Mel wrote:
>> - why does the system tries to mount the nfs filesystem from the
fstab
>> while nfs_client_enable has been set to no in rc.conf?
>Because there is no relation between the two. You could be using a 3rd
>party nfs kernel module.
Yes, but I am not. I'm using the default kernel option w
On Thursday 29 January 2009 00:47:49 Arjan van der Oest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m puzzled and either I don’t understand the boot rc.d process or there is
> something wrong with it ☺
>
> I have this 7.1-RELEASE-p2 amd64 machine compiled with a GENERIC kernel, so
> NFS support is baked right into the kern
To make it even stranger, a new fresh installed box has no problems with this
configuration. The difference between these two : on the problem box I enabled
NFS client during installation with sysinstall, on the working box I've just
added the nfs_client_enable="YES" flag manually to rc.conf.
I
I'm gonna retry installing 7.1 today on a different hardware machine ( an older
one )
let's see what happen then.
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Jos Chrispijn wrote:
[Lowell Gilbert] Uit een eerder bericht van 10-1-2009 15:51 ::
Could be hardware trouble, I suppose.
I know FreeBSD can detect hardwa
Jos Chrispijn wrote:
[Lowell Gilbert] Uit een eerder bericht van 10-1-2009 15:51 ::
Could be hardware trouble, I suppose.
I know FreeBSD can detect hardware probs better than other OS'es; but
why didn't 6.x detect this malfunction then?
I believe Murphy and his law, but for mee it seems a li
[Lowell Gilbert] Uit een eerder bericht van 10-1-2009 15:51 ::
Could be hardware trouble, I suppose.
I know FreeBSD can detect hardware probs better than other OS'es; but
why didn't 6.x detect this malfunction then?
I believe Murphy and his law, but for mee it seems a little bit too
accident
Frank Bonnet writes:
> I've installed 7.1 onto our mail exchager (MX) then it suddendly stopped
> to work last night with the following message
>
> watchdog bge0 timeout
>
>
> The machine is a HP pc which was doing the same service at 6.3 without
> that kind of trouble
Could be hardware trouble,
stan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:52:10PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains
that it cannot find libphp5.so
I usually compile php5 from ports
and apache22 from ports
after I think about it, I have never actually placed libp
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:52:10PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains
> that it cannot find libphp5.so
> I usually compile php5 from ports
> and apache22 from ports
> after I think about it, I have never actually placed libphp5.so a
> the httpd config file isn't the issue. it hasn't changed in a few years.
> yes,
> I do have the correct entries.
>
> what I do NOT have is the actual libphp5.so library file! it doesn't exist
> on my system,
> so apache complains that it can't open it.
Did you build the lang/php5 port with the "
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains that
> it cannot find libphp5.so
> I usually compile php5 from ports
> and apache22 from ports
> after I think about it, I have never actually placed libphp5.so anywhere. I
Josh Carroll wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains that
it cannot find libphp5.so
I usually compile php5 from ports
and apache22 from ports
after I think about it, I have never actually placed libphp5.s
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains that
> it cannot find libphp5.so
> I usually compile php5 from ports
> and apache22 from ports
> after I think about it, I have never actually placed libphp5.so anywhere. I
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
After installing FreeBSD 7.1 RC1 from the DVD-image I found that the
PC in question has no LAN connectivity upon reboot.
The PC has an Intel GE builtin NIC showing up as "Intel PRO/1000
Network Connection 6.9.6" in dmesg.
For the problem: Though IP-Adress, default-GW e
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:17:27PM +0100, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody out there know if FreeBSD 7.1 will come out with X.org
> 7.4 (or still 7.3)?
>
> Thanks much in advance for any clue,
> -ewald
X.org 7.4 has not been imported into the ports system yet, and this far into
the re
Ott Köstner wrote:
I had my workstation running 7.0-STABLE. Perfectly well till today.
Now I compiled and installed the latest 7.1-PRERELEASE
and now Thunderbird and Firefox got really SLOW. Everything works, but
Xorg is consuming time constatnly. Scrolling inbox is especially slow.
Asked th
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
It all depends on the programs you run, your configuration, system
load and so on. Bugs that may be present in the system, may simply not
be applicable to you, if you are not using the specific part or
feature that has the problem. While it is difficult to assess without
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:01:53PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote:
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>
> > I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC
> > status yet on 7.1
> > On a production server you will probably wish to go with
> > 7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to
Ott Köstner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am a person, who made a mistake, installing 7.1 on my production
> server (actually RELENG_7 stable, which shows up as 7.1).
>
> My question is, how stupid is that mistake? Is it better to reinstall
> 7.0 before something really bad happens, or can I jus
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
You probably don't want to risk 7.1-PRERELEASE on a server, but for
anyone running workstations, desktops, laptops I think it is worth
trying at this moment.
Hi!
I had my workstation running 7.0-STABLE. Perfectly well till today. Now I
compiled and installed the latest
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:49:26PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote:
>>
>
>>> Also, there was a strange phenomenon with FreeBSD router with pf.
>>> the rule in question is:
>>> 'scrub in all'
>>>
>>> I do not knw,
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:49:26PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote:
Also, there was a strange phenomenon with FreeBSD router with pf.
the rule in question is:
'scrub in all'
I do not knw, if this has anything to do with 7.1 issue. Maybe it is not
just a good idea to have
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:49:26PM +0200, Ott Köstner wrote:
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>> Ott Köstner wrote:
>>> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
>>>
I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC
status yet on 7.1
On a production server you will probably wish to go with
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Ott Köstner wrote:
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC
status yet on 7.1
On a production server you will probably wish to go with
7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to 7.1 by means of
freebsd-update(8) w
On Monday 17 November 2008 13:01:53 Ott Köstner wrote:
> Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC
> > status yet on 7.1
> > On a production server you will probably wish to go with
> > 7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to 7.1 by mean
Ott Köstner wrote:
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC
status yet on 7.1
On a production server you will probably wish to go with
7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to 7.1 by means of
freebsd-update(8) when it is released.
You
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
I don't think it is a matter of days, we have not even reached RC
status yet on 7.1
On a production server you will probably wish to go with
7.0-RELEASE-p5. It would be trivial to upgrade to 7.1 by means of
freebsd-update(8) when it is released.
You probably don't want
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I don't want appears as an impatient and I KNOW people that
support FreeBSD are volunteers, I am a long time user of
our prefered OS
I just would like to have an estimation for the release of 7.1.
I have two new production servers that will come tomorrow
- If the rele
Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
Hi,
don't know whether it's the CDROM drive (a Creative 52x mx) or the
motherboard (ASUS P4S8X) or what.
Anyway, I tried to install a recent version of FreeBSD (7.1-BETA2) and
the installation
hangs right in the boot process of the installation CD disc1.
I see
ac
In the vein of getting a way to install FreeBSD 7.1-BETA2 onto my SATA
IDE drive (otherwise still running 5.2.1. from IDE drives) I found in
the seek of other methods to bootstrap myself, that the boot floppy
hangs after asking for kern1 floppy. Could that be just bad media or
could it have ano
Jeremy Chadwick schrieb:
acd0: FAILURE - READ BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x21 ascq=0x00
(asc=0x21 at this time FWIW).
This won't help you get FreeBSD installed any quicker, but it will give
you some insight to what the error messages mean.
ATAPI essentially uses SCSI commands but over an ATA
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:26:38PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
>> Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
>>> Hi Al,
>>>
>>> thanks for pointing me to safe mode install. That I will probably try
>>> tomorrow.
>>> The day ended up in havoc: I tried to boot a floppy to do an A
Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
Hi Al,
thanks for pointing me to safe mode install. That I will probably try
tomorrow.
The day ended up in havoc: I tried to boot a floppy to do an ASUS
BIOS upgrade and somehow messed with the power cable.
A big flash occurred originati
Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
Hi Al,
thanks for pointing me to safe mode install. That I will probably try
tomorrow.
The day ended up in havoc: I tried to boot a floppy to do an ASUS BIOS
upgrade and somehow messed with the power cable.
A big flash occurred originating from the power supply. I o
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:46:43PM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:13:34AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
Julien Cigar wrote:
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), bu
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:46:43PM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:13:34AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
>>> Julien Cigar wrote:
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then per
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:13:34AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
Julien Cigar wrote:
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very poor
(and I'm still unable to burn a CD/DVD)
On Tue,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:13:34AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
> Julien Cigar wrote:
>> I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
>> found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very poor
>> (and I'm still unable to burn a CD/DVD)
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-11-04
Hi Al,
thanks for pointing me to safe mode install. That I will probably try
tomorrow.
The day ended up in havoc: I tried to boot a floppy to do an ASUS BIOS
upgrade and somehow messed with the power cable.
A big flash occurred originating from the power supply. I opened the
power supply, foun
Julien Cigar wrote:
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very poor
(and I'm still unable to burn a CD/DVD)
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:03 +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
Hi,
don't know whether it's
Christoph Kukulies schrieb:
Julien Cigar schrieb:
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very poor
What I've found is enable/disable IDE Master in the BIOS settings. I
disabled it to no avail.
Julien Cigar schrieb:
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very poor
What I've found is enable/disable IDE Master in the BIOS settings. I
disabled it to no avail.
Just bought a SATA CD/DVD bur
I've this problem too on almost all my machines. The only solution I've
found is to disable DMA (atapi_dma), but then performances are very poor
(and I'm still unable to burn a CD/DVD)
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:03 +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> don't know whether it's the CDROM drive (
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>
>> Firstly, I see a periodic(8) job that DOES use find -sx, which means
>> your attempt to track it down was faulty, and your syntax should have
>> been "find -sx /" not "find / -sx". See here:
>>
>> /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetui
Firstly, I see a periodic(8) job that DOES use find -sx, which means
your attempt to track it down was faulty, and your syntax should have
been "find -sx /" not "find / -sx". See here:
/etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid: find -sx $MP /dev/null -type f \
Thanks for clearing that out. :-)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:43:39AM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>
If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the
value of vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem:
# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
>>> shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
>>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0
>>> vfs.uf
Thank you very much! Probably you are right. Our users use shared IMAP
folders and sometimes they keep ten thousands of messages in one
folder. I have increased dirhash_maxmem to 64MB and see what happens.
Unfortunately, I cannot play with the hardware because it is in a
server park, and
If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of
vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem:
# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0
vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2095818
vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152
vfs.ufs.dirhash_minsize: 2560
Ma
>Johan Hendriks írta:
>> If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of
>> >vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem:
>>
>> # sysctl -a | grep dirhash
>>
>shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
>vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0
>vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2095818
>vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152
>vfs.uf
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
> Johan Hendriks írta:
>> If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of
>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem:
>>
>> # sysctl -a | grep dirhash
>>
> shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
> vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0
> vfs.ufs
Johan Hendriks írta:
If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem:
# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
shopzeus# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck: 0
vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2095818
vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152
vfs.ufs.dirhash_minsize: 25
This could be a periodic job (since you said this happens daily) which
runs early in the morning (2-3am?) and for some reason isn't finishing
in a timely manner. You haven't provided any actual ps -auxwww
data, so we can't easily discern if it's a periodic job or something
amiss on your sys
If find / -sx is running and is consuming all CPU, what is the value of
vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem:
# sysctl -a | grep dirhash
Make sure vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: is not close to vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem:
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
Double -L Automatisering
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by A
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:40:01AM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A computer hangs every day in the morning at a specific time, between 8
> AM and 9 AM. We can ping it. Apparently the console works, also gdm
> works on it, but we are not able to login at all. ssh accepts
> connections,
John L. Templer wrote:
I'm running 7.1-PRERELEASE, with /usr/src and /usr/ports last csup-ed
just a few days ago. After being up for about a day or so the system
will panic because of a page fault. I'm not completely sure, but it
seems that the system is more stable when gdm and gnome are dis
94 matches
Mail list logo
