Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-23 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-23 19:18, Doug Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:12:40 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2003-01-22 16:52, Doug Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: >>> >Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed tha

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-23 Thread Doug Reynolds
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:42:47 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2003-01-23 00:12, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Strange. This has been changed a while ago: >> >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount_msdosfs/Makefile.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18 >> >> and the only mount_m

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-23 Thread Doug Reynolds
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:12:40 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2003-01-22 16:52, Doug Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: >> >Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does >> >not have a mount_msdos command. It's no b

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-23 Thread Doug Reynolds
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:12:30 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: >Doug Reynolds wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: >> >> >>>Not a critical question, but ... >>> >>>Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does >>>not have a mount_msdos command. >>>It's no b

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 04:52:16PM -0500, Doug Reynolds wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > >Not a critical question, but ... > > > >Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does > >not have a mount_msdos command. > >It's no biggie, I just used '

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-23 00:12, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Strange. This has been changed a while ago: > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount_msdosfs/Makefile.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18 > > and the only mount_msdos binary that I have in my system is a rather > stale copy from

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-22 16:52, Doug Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > >Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does > >not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount > >-t msdos' and got what I wanted, but

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Bill Moran
Doug Reynolds wrote: On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Not a critical question, but ... Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t msdos' and got what I wanted, but I was wondering

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Doug Reynolds
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote: >Not a critical question, but ... > >Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does >not have a mount_msdos command. >It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t msdos' and got what I wanted, >but I was wondering why this was miss

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Bill Moran
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jan 22), Bill Moran said: Not a critical question, but ... Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t msdos' and got what I wanted, but I was wondering why this wa

Re: 5.0-RELEASE and mount_msdos

2003-01-22 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 22), Bill Moran said: > Not a critical question, but ... > > Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does > not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t > msdos' and got what I wanted, but I was wondering why this was > missin