I see. So, RELENG_4 will be the more actively developed one(
new drivers, etc) - if something like that can be said for the 4.X.
Thanks a lot, Giorgo and Matthew
Nikos
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 2004-07-21 10:37, Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need a confirmation/correction about this. Is RELENG-4 and
> RELENG-4-10 the same thing, since the latest stable is 4.10?
Please note that the tags do not use hyphens as in `1-2' but underscore
characters as in `4_10'.
The answ
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 10:37:42AM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> I need a confirmation/correction about this. Is RELENG-4 and RELENG-4-10 the same
> thing,
> since the latest stable is 4.10? if i got this right, RELENG-4-10 will be used to
> stay explicitly
> with 4.10-? and RELENG-4 will be
Hi to all,
I need a confirmation/correction about this. Is RELENG-4 and RELENG-4-10 the same
thing,
since the latest stable is 4.10? if i got this right, RELENG-4-10 will be used to stay
explicitly
with 4.10-? and RELENG-4 will be used to update to the latest 4.X-STABLE. All security
fixes
and
