Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:42:00 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
RM> Because compiling does take very long, I will not update the whole
RM> ports tree that often, I alos like to keep software versions that
RM> fit to my needs when ever possible, but I guess without breaking
RM> dependencies it theor
> of course, for such use I will take the or stable version :-)
>
> I was sure it was easy :-)
>
> thanks
> jdd
Just to clarify, X-STABLE does not indicate end-user stability. It
indicates the ABI is (generally) stable (ABI-compatibility is
maintained within a branch). There are exceptions, but th
Manolis Kiagias a écrit :
The FreeBSD base system gets security updates through freebsd-update,
very easily:
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update update
(assuming you install a -RELEASE version)
of course, for such use I will take the or stable version :-)
I was sure it was easy :-)
thanks
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:09:01 +0200
jdd sur free <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello :-)
> I'm new to freeBSD, so forgive me if my question is boring :-(
[...]
Welcome jjd!
>
> so then, my question: what about security updates? with openSUSE I
> have an automatic update. For freeBSD, I didn't fin
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM, jdd sur free <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello :-)
> so then, my question: what about security updates? with openSUSE I have an
> automatic update. For freeBSD, I didn't find anything on this archive list
> and the google search sent me to old doc (2003)
>
> http:
jdd sur free wrote:
Hello :-)
I'm new to freeBSD, so forgive me if my question is boring :-(
I just discover than my computer hosting company allow the use of
freeBSD
(http://www.ovh.com/fr/particulier/items/distributions/free_bsd.xml?sort=bsd&gm=pop)
on they cheap (20€/month
http://www.ovh.
I run "freebsd-update" as a cron job to check for security updates daily.
At 07:16 PM 2/9/05 +0100, you wrote:
Hexren writes:
> How does it sound ;)
>
> If a bug that affects security is found, an update to fix is
> produced. In my definition this counts as security update.
Fine. So what's the con
Hexren writes:
> How does it sound ;)
>
> If a bug that affects security is found, an update to fix is
> produced. In my definition this counts as security update.
Fine. So what's the connection to cron?
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
What are security updates?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Jeff Maxwell wrote:
I got this message today from cron, apparently my security update failed.
Any Idea how to resolve this. I am also get a similar message on a 5.3
box.
Fetching updates signature...
fetch: http://update.daemonology.net/i386/4.9/updates.sig: Not
FoundError fetching updates
Jeff
Jeff Maxwell wrote:
I got this message today from cron, apparently my security update failed.
Any Idea how to resolve this. I am also get a similar message on a 5.3 box.
Fetching updates signature...
fetch: http://update.daemonology.net/i386/4.9/updates.sig: Not
FoundError fetching updates
It appe
> I got this message today from cron, apparently my security
> update failed.
>
> Any Idea how to resolve this. I am also get a similar message
> on a 5.3 box.
>
>
> Fetching updates signature...
> fetch: http://update.daemonology.net/i386/4.9/updates.sig:
> Not FoundError fetching updates
>
* Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-30 11:14]:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >On 2004-03-29 15:07, Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
> [ ... ]
> >>>If a tag just the 4_9 Release in the CVSupfile can i just ignore the
> >>>mergemaste
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-03-29 15:07, Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
[ ... ]
If a tag just the 4_9 Release in the CVSupfile can i just ignore the
mergemaster? also can I just CVSup the sources and build the ones I
want? (see above)
On 2004-03-29 15:07, Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
>>I don't want to build "all" sources when I just need these on my
>>system (bin, man, and crypto). The same selection I use from a new
>>install from /stand/sysinstall. Is that possibl
On Mar 29, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
I don't want to build "all" sources when I just need these on my
system (bin, man, and crypto). The same selection I use from a new
install from /stand/sysinstall. Is that possible?
If you look at /etc/default/make.conf for a bunch of components
On Monday 29 March 2004 01:28 pm, Sean Murphy wrote:
> I would like to stay patched with the latest security advisories.
> However usually I wait until the next release iso becomes available and
> do a fresh install that includes all the known exploites. My reason
> behind this is the "makeworld",
17 matches
Mail list logo
