On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:54:26 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wow, i think both name-calling and using 4 letter words is against the
> "charter".
> Lets see if they only practice selective enforcement.
Can someone please ban him (her?).
They never seem to have anything construct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow, i think both name-calling and using 4 letter words is against the
"charter".
Lets see if they only practice selective enforcement.
Is it too late to say it was just a passing curiosity and that if you
boys can't play nice, then don't play at all?!
Quinn
In a message dated 11/9/04 1:10:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>don't believe in democracy but in this case it could come handy.
>Somebody could propose like: "let's get this fuck off the list" and we'd
>say ... well ... I say YES!
wow, i think both name-calling and usin
I don't believe in democracy but in this case it could come handy.
Somebody could propose like: "let's get this fuck off the list" and we'd
say ... well ... I say YES!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a technical forum? Yikes!
Is it, Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
I remember a man. His name was Don. He called himself Rev.
And then one day, god truly spoke to the dear Rev, or maybe just the
rest of us, and we stopped feeding the troll. and for a time, it was
g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:59:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a technical forum? Yikes!
Is it, Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
Used to be Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
and in a bit will be Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
It would be nice if TM4
In a message dated 11/8/04 4:59:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This is a technical forum? Yikes!
>Is it, Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
Well then why don't you fill Mr. "I pay my ISP so I should be able to use all
the bandwidth I want" how things really work, because I don
This is a technical forum? Yikes!
Is it, Mr./Ms. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
--
Matthias Buelow; [EMAIL PROTECTED],informatik.uni-wuerzburg}.de
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
In a message dated 11/8/04 1:23:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Its not a legal/illegal issue. Its a "using more bandwidth than you are
> paying for" issue. Im sure if you were running bittorrent all day long
> your ISP would be very glad to see you go.
>I'm paying for a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not a legal/illegal issue. Its a "using more bandwidth than you are
paying for" issue. Im sure if you were running bittorrent all day long
your ISP would be very glad to see you go.
I'm paying for a flatrate (ADSL) at home. I don't use the bandwidth
most of the time,
In a message dated 11/8/04 11:33:41 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Its become widely used for "sharing" in the same way as Kazaa and
> other "point to point" as they're called protocols. Many ISPs block it,
> or at least substantially slow it down.
>Well. Of course it can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its become widely used for "sharing" in the same way as Kazaa and
other "point to point" as they're called protocols. Many ISPs block it,
or at least substantially slow it down.
Well. Of course it can be abused for w4r3z aswell as used for legal
purposes. If my ISP woul
Its become widely used for "sharing" in the same way as Kazaa and
other "point to point" as they're called protocols. Many ISPs block it,
or at least substantially slow it down.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:05:59AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No reputable organization would promote bittorrant for getting a release.
This was the last straw for me.
*PLONK*
--Stijn
--
"Harry, I'm going to let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day,
give yourself a present.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course anyone with an ISP that has a bandwidth management device,
bittorrent (a cancerous protocol which wastes others bandwdith in the process of
possibly saving yours) will likely either not work well or be very slow.
No reputable organization would promote bittorr
In a message dated 11/8/04 2:22:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Lets do the math...
>> you'll note that http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ at this moment
>> says there's been 1978 completed downloads.
>> Lets pick an arbitrary average size for each file downloaded: 388MB
Not to mention, if there are enough clients hosting, then downloads can
often be faster.
Why? Because partial downloads can be pulled from multiple sources.
I just downloaded the miniinst iso in under 15min at an average rate of
about 360KB/s from a pool of 10 servents (bittorrent server/clients
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Quinn Ellis wrote:
Why do you download with bittorrent as opposed to FTP?
Lets do the math...
you'll note that http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ at this moment
says there's been 1978 completed downloads.
Lets pick an arbitrary average size for each fi
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Quinn Ellis wrote:
Why do you download with bittorrent as opposed to FTP?
Lets do the math...
you'll note that http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ at this moment says
there's been 1978 completed downloads.
Lets pick an arbitrary average size for each file downloaded: 388MB
3
Quinn Ellis wrote:
Why do you download with bittorrent as opposed to FTP?
Lets do the math...
you'll note that http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ at this moment says
there's been 1978 completed downloads.
Lets pick an arbitrary average size for each file downloaded: 388MB
388 * 1978 = 767.5GB
11/[
On Monday 08 November 2004 00:28, Quinn Ellis wrote:
> nbco wrote:
> >Hey list,
> >I downloaded the 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1 iso via bittorrent.
> >
> >The iso (644.91MB) downloaded in about 3 hours, over a 512/256 adsl
> >connection. Which I think is pretty good.
> >
> >There don't seem to be that
In the immortal words of Quinn Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Why do you download with bittorrent as opposed to FTP?
Distributed sources, this way FTP servers don't get as hammered if parts
of the download are coming from multiple sources.
Cheers
Tim
--
Tim Aslat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spyderweb
Nice dude..well quinn the freebsd team is giving bitorrent a whirl!
* nbco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hey list,
> I downloaded the 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1 iso via bittorrent.
>
> The iso (644.91MB) downloaded in about 3 hours, over a 512/256 adsl
> connection. Which I think is pretty good.
>
nbco wrote:
Hey list,
I downloaded the 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1 iso via bittorrent.
The iso (644.91MB) downloaded in about 3 hours, over a 512/256 adsl
connection. Which I think is pretty good.
There don't seem to be that many people uploading it from me at the
moment.
I'm impressed,
.nbco
24 matches
Mail list logo
