Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread David Naylor
On Monday 24 January 2011 14:52:05 Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:18:21 + > > RW articulated: > > I have > > > > tmpfs/tmp tmpfs rw,size=428000 > > > > I would suggest you don't use tmpmfs="YES" in rc.conf unless you are > > being very conservative with a production server

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread Bruce Cran
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:42:55 -0500 Jerry wrote: > FreeBSD, at least from what > I can ascertain, really does not have good support for ZFS anyway. I > question whether releasing a product of dubious functionality is an > intelligent thing to do. The old axiom of only getting one chance to > make

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:25:05 + Bruce Cran articulated: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:09:05 -0500 > Jerry wrote: > > > I had not heard about that. What problems does its use exhibit when > > used in conjunction with ZFS? > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-January/060867.h

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread Bruce Cran
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:09:05 -0500 Jerry wrote: > I had not heard about that. What problems does its use exhibit when > used in conjunction with ZFS? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-January/060867.html -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:38:10 + Bruce Cran articulated: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:18:21 + > RW wrote: > > > tmpfs is nominally > > experimental, but it seems to be very stable, and it's much more > > memory efficient than md devices. > > But it doesn't work well with ZFS. I had not hea

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:18:21 + RW articulated: > I have > > tmpfs/tmp tmpfs rw,size=428000 > > I would suggest you don't use tmpmfs="YES" in rc.conf unless you are > being very conservative with a production server. tmpfs is nominally > experimental, but it seems to be very stab

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread Bruce Cran
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:18:21 + RW wrote: > tmpfs is nominally > experimental, but it seems to be very stable, and it's much more > memory efficient than md devices. But it doesn't work well with ZFS. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.o

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-24 Thread RW
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:47:23 -0800 kellyremo wrote: > > "to memory" means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or > ramfs? ], and put the "/tmp" on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. > what to write in the "/etc/fstab"? I have tmpfs/tmp tmpfs rw,size=428000 I would suggest

Re: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-23 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sun 23 Jan 2011 at 11:13:23 PST Terrence Koeman wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of kellyremo Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 14:47 To: FreeBSD Subject: putting "/tmp" to memory Importance: High

RE: putting "/tmp" to memory

2011-01-23 Thread Terrence Koeman
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of kellyremo > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 14:47 > To: FreeBSD > Subject: putting "/tmp" to memory > Importance: High > > > "to memory" means: mounting a ~2 GByte fi