Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-07-02 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Johan Hendriks wrote: >> Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: > We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to > CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?

Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread O. Hartmann
Johan Hendriks wrote: Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards Kon

RE: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread Johan Hendriks
>>Konrad Heuer wrote: >> >> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to >>> CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? >> >> As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building >> Samba from ports. >> >> Best reg

Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread O. Hartmann
Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fass

Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-19 Thread Konrad Heuer
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettinge