On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 02:54:07PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> On 05-Feb-2006 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> > Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts
> > mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On
> > [snip]
> >
Let me be more clear bec
On 05-Feb-2006 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts
> mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On
> Friday I came across a gimp script-fu which would slice an image into
> pieces and output html that rendered the
On Thursday 15 December 2005 11:45, Wes Santee wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> | On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:32, Wes Santee wrote:
> |>Greetings,
> |>
> |>I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via
> |>the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
| On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:32, Wes Santee wrote:
|
|>Greetings,
|>
|>I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via
|>the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it builds and
|>ins
On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:32, Wes Santee wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via
> the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it builds and
> installs www/gnome-user-share. *That* port forces the www/apache20 port
> upon me.
