On 02/19/2012 10:39, Terrence Koeman wrote:
> I'm just done converting from named.root to slaving the root, I
> checked which servers allow axfr (at least for me...) and added them
> all as masters.
Given that some of the root server operators don't really like people
doing this routinely it woul
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 01:14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
>>> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers
>>> around the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't
>>> noti
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
>> the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
>> something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (o
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
> the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
> something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones, depending
> on what you choose to slave).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
>
>
> We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
> the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
> Anonymous.
Given their suc
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
>
>
> We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
> the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
> Anonymous.
>
> I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask w
