On 02/19/2012 10:39, Terrence Koeman wrote:
> I'm just done converting from named.root to slaving the root, I
> checked which servers allow axfr (at least for me...) and added them
> all as masters.
Given that some of the root server operators don't really like people
doing this routinely it woul
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 01:14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
>>> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers
>>> around the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't
>>> noti
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
>> the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
>> something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (o
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
> the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
> something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones, depending
> on what you choose to slave).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
>
>
> We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
> the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
> Anonymous.
Given their suc
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
>
>
> We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
> the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
> Anonymous.
>
> I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask w
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:06:39AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You /can/ have a nameserver with same IP as www. And you /can/ multihome
> your NIC with multiple IP on same machine,
>
> ie,
> www.example.com 192.168.0.131 and 192.168.0.132 (if you want, optional
> extra address for w
Now after refreshing my memory (it happened one year ago) I
> could remember that I did register the nameservers. I found the
> option in my registar to add to some domain i.e. mydomain.com
> the entries ns1.mydomain.com, etc. I think that the problem I
> had was related with the IPs. The VPS p
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> Yes, you can run BIND on the same FreeBSD machine as your web server.
> You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net -
> ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different
> than D
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net -
> ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different
> than DOMAIN whois) on http://www.internic.net/whois.html) and also for each
T
Kevin Zheng writes:
> FreeBSD comes with a name server already installed; you don't
> need to get it from the ports, although I'm not sure what
> difference it makes.
The version in ports is a later issue in te BIND 9.* series.
If the difference is important to you, you probably aren'
Hello,
I've been using FreeBSD as a local nameserver (with my own .local
domains!) for quite some time. FreeBSD comes with a name server already
installed; you don't need to get it from the ports, although I'm not
sure what difference it makes. The one that comes with FreeBSD can be
enabled with n
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
> Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I am
> lost :-).
Where you are now, so once were most of us. :-)
> Sure, like you say, it is possible "running" BIND and Apache.
> But, is it possible|convenient that the name server "reside" i
>
>
> Sure, like you say, it is possible "running" BIND and Apache.
> But, is it possible|convenient that the name server "reside" in
> the same machine that host (with apache) the domain names served
> by it? Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I
> am lost :-).
>
> Or to simplify
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:24:59PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> >
> > Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
> >
> > > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
> > > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thi
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:54:59PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
>
> > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
> > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
> > was not able to automatically update in the system with my
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
>
> > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
> > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
> > was not able to automatically update in the system with my
> > scri
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
> Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
> machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
> was not able to automatically update in the system with my
> scripts each time a new customer purchased a service. It would
> be
Waitman Gobble writes:
> > Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to
> > support my domain
>
> You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns
BIND is part of the base system.
> I recommend you read the O'Reilly book DNS and BIND.
Agreed.
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 12:51:42PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lewis
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my
> > domain
> >
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns
>
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lewis
wrote:
>
> Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my
> domain
>
Hi Daniel,
You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns
I recommend you read the O'Reilly book DNS and BIND.
Basic process -
Install and con
On 11/3/11 11:35 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Actually, using a view that matches only the VPN's IP range would do the
>> trick easily and efficiently.
>
> Views are a way of giving a different answer depending on who is asking
> the question -- how
On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> You can simply create a forward zone.
Actually, yes, that's a good idea too. Should have much the same effect
and it's been available in BIND approximately forever. There's
difference in the niggling details of how it all works, so worth
experimenti
On 11/3/11 8:51 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote:
>> I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
>> and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do
>> I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote:
> I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
> and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do
> I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
> specific domain.
This sounds like a job for a
It depends...
some VPNs push routes, including default routes, and nameservers and
search paths, but it's up to the client on how to handle it. Some of
these will set /etc/resolv.conf, etc.
What *kind* of VPN are you talking about? OpenVPN? PPTP? L2TP?
I generally prefer dnscache to BIND, an
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:14:21 +0100
> From: Matthew Seaman
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: Gary Kline
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>
> On 08/07/2011 23:04, Gary Kline wrote:
>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 07:49:43AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:49:43 -0600
> From: Dan Busarow
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gary Kline
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
>
>
On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Gary, add
named_flags="-c /etc/namedb/named.conf"
to /etc/rc.conf. Or change /etc/namedb/named.conf to the /var
version if you like/there is no symlink.
Dan
Dan! I think
On 08/07/2011 23:04, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
>> From: Matthew Seaman
>> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>
&g
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:12 -0600
> From: Dan Busarow
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
> From: Matthew Seaman
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>
> On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
> > On 7 July 20
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:25:34AM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:25:34 -0700
> From: Doug Hardie
> Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
>
>
> On 7 July 2011,
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/
named.conf: file not found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c /
var/named/
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
> On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
>
>>> >> Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file
>>> >> not found
>>> >> Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
>>> >> /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
>
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
>> Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file not
>> found
>> Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
>> /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
The first one that fails is looking for /etc/named.conf. Th
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:00:42PM +, Gary Kline wrote:
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:00:42 +
> From: Gary Kline
> Subject: DNS and file system messed up...
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
>
>
> Guys,
>
> I'd be much obliged to learn why /etc/rc.named start fails. This has been
> going
> on
> alternatively try one of the torrents, it should survive disconnections far
> better than ftp etc
Yes, try the torrents. I don't seed them for nothing. This is
probably one of the best ways to get FreeBSD.
Here they are: http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/
__
On 3 April 2011 18:10, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:57, Kenneth Parit
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I look forward to becoming the DNS Administrator for my country Kenya.
> >
> > It is impossible to download FreeBSD 8.2 from any of the mirror sites
> > due to disconnect
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:57, Kenneth Parit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I look forward to becoming the DNS Administrator for my country Kenya.
>
> It is impossible to download FreeBSD 8.2 from any of the mirror sites
> due to disconnections.
>
> Since I am contactable any day/time of the year and skilled
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:57:27PM +0300, Kenneth Parit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I look forward to becoming the DNS Administrator for my country Kenya.
>
> It is impossible to download FreeBSD 8.2 from any of the mirror sites
> due to disconnections.
>
> Since I am contactable any day/time of the yea
On Friday, November 19, 2010 07:25:10 pm Gary Gatten wrote:
> I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing
> NAT. Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on
> DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the
> DNS ALG t
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing NAT.
Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on DNS
packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the DNS ALG to
fix the "problem".
If your ns is behind a NATing device, start
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:02:13AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/05/2010 21:40:02, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> > I've got a small DNS server on my home network, and ever since May 6,
> > 2010 (co-incidentally DNSSEC root sign day), lookups o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 21:40:02, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> I've got a small DNS server on my home network, and ever since May 6,
> 2010 (co-incidentally DNSSEC root sign day), lookups on freebsd.org have
> started failing. eg:
Uh, the DURZ was installed on j.roo
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:25:43 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:29:30AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> You have some serious DNS issues with your current setup. I think you
>> should start by:
>>
>> 1) *Removing* from the NS records of your domain the name servers that
>>
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:07 -0700
xSAPPYx wrote:
> Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
> on all these domains, use A records
You can use the domains for mail provided that that they share MX
servers, if example.com has a CNAME pointing to example.net then mai
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
on all these domains, use A records
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Cavanaugh
wrote:
>
>> >how is this illegal?
>>
>> CNAME rule:
>>
>> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
>>
>> for the node domain.tld
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the canonical name ra
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should have
an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if
> >how is this illegal?
>
> CNAME rule:
>
> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
>
> for the node domain.tld:
>
> domain.tld. soa ...
> domain.tld. ns ...
> domain.tld. cname otherdomain.tld.
>
> this node has a CNAME and "other data", so it's illegal, no matter what you
>
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should
have an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if i
had control ov
>> >All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
>> >was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
>> >this.
>> >
>> >example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>> >www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>> >
>> >I was taught this was not good form
>>
>>
>
>All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
>was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
>this.
>
>example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>
>I was taught this was not good form
worse, it's illegal.
,
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
> From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: DNS Question
>
> Good morning.
>
> I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
> record for new domains we host instead
DAve wrote:
Good morning.
I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
record for new domains we host instead of a CNAME.
The issue I run into lately with some domains is that a client has a
website with a industry host such as frank.relator.com and he wants to
have
Replies interspersed
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:15 -0400, David Banning wrote:
> I have had my dns server working fine in the past but now it seems
> to be down and I can't locate the reason.
>
> Here are some details;
>
> # dig @127.0.0.1 mylocaldomain.com
Is this a real registered .com or so
As it turns out - following a new installation, named.conf is
in /var/named/etc/namedb with a symlink from /etc/namedb.
To keep all my original DNS records and settings
I had restored a backup to /etc/namedb which destroyed the
symlink - as a result when I altered /etc/namedb/named.conf
named did
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Zamri Besar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... tools to manage a big deployment of dns and dhcp services?
>
>
What do you mean by "big"? Or, how big is "big".
--
regards,
dg
"..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." --
M.W.Lucas
___
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
>> requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
>> but i
Jim presented these words - circa 7/21/08 6:30 PM->
I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why).
I have a machine with two built in NICs on the mot
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
> requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
> but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why).
>
> I have a machine with two buil
--On Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:05:11 -0500 Joshua Frugé
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning
Joshua Frugé wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning vuln that seems to be all the rage lately?
I'm running freebsd 7.
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 15:35 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:36:51AM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server192.168.
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:36:51AM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
> before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
> inside of it
>
> domain name myplace.com.ph
> name server 101.1.21.1
> name server192.168.1.62
>
The problems with what you've just posted are:
Ok..I have follow your post D Hill, but it doesn't solve the problem
Please HELP...
Thanks..:(
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:45 AM, D Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 09:36 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
>
> before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 09:36 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server192.168.1.62
According to the resolver(5) documentation, it should loo
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server192.168.1.62
could it be my firewall blocking it? but i didn't change any configuration
from it..
Thanks in advance for your help..:(
>
>
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Christer Hermansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ruel Luchavez wrote:
>
> > when i resume it to its current configuration
> > "Obtain DBS server automatically" th
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
when i resume it to its current configuration
"Obtain DBS server automatically" the problem is back, is this a problem in
my DNS server?
I'm using the FreeBSD 6.2 version...
I already restarted the DNS Server "/etc/rc.d/named restart" but nothing
happens the problem is still
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
/etc/rc.d/named restart
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
Thanks in advanced..
___
freebsd-questions@fr
> I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on
> how
> to restart it?
> is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is
> no
> command for it?
You might like to try
# rndc reload
Cheers
> Thanks in advanced..
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
> to restart it?
> is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
> command for it?
That is somewhat different to
On Monday 14 April 2008 11:02:43 Ruel Luchavez wrote:
> I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
> to restart it?
> is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
> command for it?
If you start reading here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en
Hi Erik:
I don't recall the how-to explaining the usage of this script. I too,
just recently setup a DNS server for a couple domains. My
recommendation is to familiarize yourself with the Administrators
Reference Manual (ARM) on BIND's website:
http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/arm93/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
国徽 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am building the DNS Server,But I can't find the script
> "/etc/namedb/make-localhost" used in the document, So I can't go on
> now? Please tell me how to find the script,Thank you very much!>
>
Unfortunately the docume
Hi there,
On 20/02/2008, Jordan Gordeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> See /etc/rc.d/named and /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist.
> And please, next time don't be so quick on mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO questions is exactly dedicated for this purpose. Of course the OP
could've solved the problem
Deian Popov wrote:
Hello,
I have the following problem with bind:
it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the system
all files and directories under /etc/namedb become owned by root:wheel so
bind is unable is unable to update it's zone files after dhcpd leases IP to
any g
Thank you both, you solved the problem!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ruben de Groot writes:
>
> > > I have the following problem with bind:
> > >
> > > it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the
> system
> > > all files and
Ruben de Groot writes:
> > I have the following problem with bind:
> >
> > it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the system
> > all files and directories under /etc/namedb become owned by root:wheel so
> > bind is unable is unable to update it's zone files after dhcp
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:09:53AM +0200, Deian Popov typed:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following problem with bind:
>
> it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the system
> all files and directories under /etc/namedb become owned by root:wheel so
> bind is unable is unable to
please read apache manual and set up httpd.conf right. it's not only
possible, but very often used, i have >30 sites on one IP
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domai
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 06:00:27PM -0500, Brian Finniff wrote:
>
> My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
> Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
> address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP addres
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:50:17 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:00:27 -0500
> Brian Finniff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people
> > on the Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but y
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:00:27 -0500
Brian Finniff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
> Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
> address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same
Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP address and
somehow each one becomes distinct? If so, h
Hi,
> Of course, just setup a virtual host in your httpd.conf file point
> the dns to the same ip. Apache will take care of the rest.
To be a litthe bit more precise, in your Apache configuraton you need
something like:
NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1
ServerName www.first-server.com
...
ServerN
Of course, just setup a virtual host in your httpd.conf file point
the dns to the same ip. Apache will take care of the rest.
Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have on
if your not running with -4 you will get this, unless you
have IPv6 configured of course...
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Barnett
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:46 PM
> To: freeBSD
> Subject: DNS Cache - Bind
>
>
> I'm run
Jack Barnett wrote:
> I'm running Bind 9.3.4 on FreeBSD 6.2 for my local network.
>
> It doesn't have any zones, it's just a local DNS that has a bunch of
> forwarders.
>
> The first request is slow (between 150 and 300 ms) - but after that
> (the next query on same domain) is fast (less then 10
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:59:20PM +0100, Jay Azimi wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a network run under Windows 2003 server with
>
> About 13 stations.
>
Hmmm. THere are many versitile persons with cross system experience
on this list, so you might get some help.But, your message doesn't
Hello there hiding behind an anonymous email account whoever you are,
Not knowing what you really ask for, since you don't provide much
information I assume that you want to setup a small dns for LAN with
forwarding to your ISP?
If this is correct may I suggest that you have look at djbdns fr
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:16:46AM -1200, neo neo wrote:
> hi
>
> For NAT ;
>
> i already configure internal and external ip . And also finished gateway.
>
> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Will you be doing your own DNS or will that be done by your ISP?
>
> by the way , " r
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:56:31 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
> >
> > Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
> > book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care.
> > The
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The
internet depends on it.
exactly. it's quite easy to make domains not synchronize to slaves right
etc. w
neo neo wrote:
could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
Please stop posting the same question multiple times.
Also,
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html
Nick.
___
freebsd-questions@freeb
On Thursday 15 March 2007 14:53, neo neo said:
> could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
You really need to read the handbook. Most of your questions will be
answered there.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html
Bind and DNS questions here:
http:/
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:16:46 -1200
"neo neo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The
internet depends on it.
--
Dick
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
