portsnap read the refuse file?
--
Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[E
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Aren Olvalde Tyr wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:00, martinko wrote:
>
> > i'm eagerly waiting for it.. and i'm sure i'm not the only one.. good
> > luck aren!
> >
> > m:)
>
> Thanks :^)
>
> I've actually finally got a day off tomorrow (been workin
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:00, martinko wrote:
> i'm eagerly waiting for it.. and i'm sure i'm not the only one.. good
> luck aren!
>
> m:)
Thanks :^)
I've actually finally got a day off tomorrow (been working for the last 9
consecutive days!) so will have a chance to work on it some more.
A
Aren Olvalde Tyr wrote:
>> Portmanager already has this I believe. You can add config options to
>> the portmanager config file and it will use them when building things.
>> For example:
>>
>> #
>> # custom settings #
>> # remove "#" to use #
>> #
>> #text
> Portmanager already has this I believe. You can add config options to
> the portmanager config file and it will use them when building things.
> For example:
>
> #
> # custom settings #
> # remove "#" to use #
> #
> #textproc/docproj|JADETEX=no|
> #java/
> The FreeBSD ports system + portsnap + portupgrade is a truly awesome
> combination, much better than any other package management system I've
> ever
> used on other systems.
>
> I'm currently working on a little port configuration tool to make
tweaking
> all
> the port Make knobs more convenient
> # portsnap fetch update;)
>
> Assuming, of course, you've already extracted the tree...
Ahh, of course, nice.
The FreeBSD ports system + portsnap + portupgrade is a truly awesome
combination, much better than any other package management system I've ever
used on other systems.
I'm curren
Yea, Colin's the man.
http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ highlights all the beneifts.
-David
On 5/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 01:35 PM 5/13/2006, Tom Moore wrote:
>Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up
>to date? What are some pros and
At 01:35 PM 5/13/2006, Tom Moore wrote:
Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up
to date? What are some pros and cons of each approach? Is one method
better than the other?
I just discovered portsnap a couple months ago after loading a couple
new machines with 6.0.
On 5/13/06, Aren Olvalde Tyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 13 May 2006 18:35, Tom Moore wrote:
> Hi guys.
> Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to
date?
> What are some pros and cons of each approach?
> Is one method better than the other?
Both systems ar
On Saturday 13 May 2006 18:35, Tom Moore wrote:
> Hi guys.
> Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to date?
> What are some pros and cons of each approach?
> Is one method better than the other?
Both systems are very efficient and work extremely well, so you won't go t
11 matches
Mail list logo
