Re: Compiling the kernel

2004-11-07 Thread R. W.
On Saturday 06 November 2004 14:19, Valerian Galeru wrote: > Could there appear any problems if the /usr/src/sys > tree is not completely updated(I mean I started > updating , but I didn`t finish) ? If you mean: can cvsup be stopped, and started again? the answer is yes it can. If you mean that

RE: compiling the kernel

2004-11-07 Thread Andrei Iarus
I have a 4.9R installed on my system. ANd I want to patch the existing system. I have downloaded those patches, I have done exactly as is written in those advisories. And the make command fails (I use the traditional way of compiling). Please, could you take a look at my kernel config file? __

Re: Compiling the kernel

2004-11-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 06:19:26AM -0800, Valerian Galeru wrote: > Could there appear any problems if the /usr/src/sys > tree is not completely updated(I mean I started > updating , but I didn`t finish) ? Yes, of course. Kris pgpeADVJXcFms.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: Compiling the kernel

2004-11-06 Thread Valerian Galeru
Could there appear any problems if the /usr/src/sys tree is not completely updated(I mean I started updating , but I didn`t finish) ? __ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com __

RE: Compiling the kernel

2003-12-01 Thread sundeep.puliccott
I'm a newbie. I built the kernel the first time yesterday There is a new way to build the kernel documented here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-b uilding.html It worked for me. I do not really sure what the difference is. Hope it helps -sundeep -Origin

Re: Compiling the kernel

2003-12-01 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:34:43AM -0600, Kenzo wrote: > What happened to > make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL > make installkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL > > did this change in newer version or something? > I thought the above was the new way of rebuilding a kernel. Am I not up to > date? No, what you d

Re: Compiling the kernel

2003-12-01 Thread Jerry McAllister
> > What happened to > make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL > make installkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL > > did this change in newer version or something? > I thought the above was the new way of rebuilding a kernel. Am I not up to > date? I think this is newer and what I posted is the old tried and true

Re: Compiling the kernel

2003-12-01 Thread Kenzo
ROTECTED]> To: "Valerian Galeru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Compiling the kernel > > > > I want to build a new kernel. I have edit the GENERIC > > file (like is written into the docum

Re: Compiling the kernel

2003-12-01 Thread Jerry McAllister
> > I want to build a new kernel. I have edit the GENERIC > file (like is written into the documentation). And > when i run /usr/sbin/config > /root/kernels/MYKERNEL(this is my kernel) i get a lot > of errors Command not found. What is made wrong??? First of all, I presume you really used one lin

Re: Compiling the kernel

2003-12-01 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:12:53 -0800 (PST) Valerian Galeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to build a new kernel. I have edit the GENERIC > file (like is written into the documentation). And > when i run /usr/sbin/config > /root/kernels/MYKERNEL(this is my kernel) i get a lot > of errors Command