Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-02-03 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:57:50PM -0700, Pat Maddox wrote: > The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea > what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in > that state. So I don't know what to do. There's no output, I can't > find any logs, there's just

Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-30 Thread Pat Maddox
To: > > Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 4:57 PM > Subject: Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything > > > The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea > > what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in > > that state

Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-30 Thread Thomas Foster
- From: "Pat Maddox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 4:57 PM Subject: Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in that st

Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-30 Thread J65nko BSD
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:57:50 -0700, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea > what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in > that state. So I don't know what to do. There's no output, I can't > find any logs

Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-29 Thread Pat Maddox
The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in that state. So I don't know what to do. There's no output, I can't find any logs, there's just no way for me to tell what's wrong. On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:59:46

Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-29 Thread Pat Maddox
I followed that tutorial, there's no difference. When I run top I see that there is a named process that's owned by the bind user, but it doesn't open a port and I then obviously can't query the server. On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:59:46 -0800, Thomas Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you might wa

RE: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-29 Thread GRF .
I believe the executable for the default install of BIND 8 is /usr/sbin/named Try ./namedthat should start it up. From: Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005

Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything

2005-01-29 Thread Thomas Foster
you might want to add named_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf check out the following tutorial on setting up Bind9 http://www.section6.net/help/bind.php Hope this helps.. T - Original Message - From: "Pat Maddox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 3:54 PM Subject: BI