> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RW
> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 2:35 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 23:16:35 -0700
> "
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:05:03 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Get a personal website from the ISP
Definitely - testing from anywhere else than somewhere in your ISP's network
will add to the equation all the bandwidth-affecting-factors to/from the
*other* network / hosts. O
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 23:16:35 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> However, the thing that most people (who don't work at telcos) do not
> understand is that the telcos found very quickly that they cannot put
> contention into an ATM network comprised of a DSL atm circuits for
Thank you all for the information and the hints; very helpful. At
least, now I've got a clue.
Bahman
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
Hi Bahman,
Bahman M. wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ADSL connection at home.
When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
far so good.
But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
consumed.
The guys in the ISP say they've granted me the requeste
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joao Barros
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 7:33 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> On 9/
On 9/8/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Amitabh Kant
> > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 12:25 PM
> > To: Bahman M.
> > Cc: fre
PM
> > To: Bahman M.
> > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
> >
> >
> > On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously
> > > and use
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand this. If the actual DSL circuit is point-to-point -
i.e., not shared between the premise and the DSLAM in the CO, just
exactly *where* is the contention occuring?
Inside the ISP's router.
However even cheap
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: RW
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> RW wrote:
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Amitabh Kant
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 12:25 PM
> To: Bahman M.
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> On 9/8/0
Get a personal website from the ISP
Upload a file to the personal webserver
Download the file from the personal webserver.
If the bandwidth isn't what it's supposed to be, then
have the ISP call the local telephone company and have
that company check to see that your modem is training at
the co
RW wrote:
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:27:38 -0500
Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amitabh Kant wrote:
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously
and used 'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to
him). As I'd a
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:27:38 -0500
Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amitabh Kant wrote:
> > On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously
> >> and used 'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to
> >> him). As
Amitabh Kant wrote:
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously and used
'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to him). As I'd
already guessed the RX don't get bigger than 30~40% of the expected
bandwidth. I perform
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously and used
> 'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to him). As I'd
> already guessed the RX don't get bigger than 30~40% of the expected
> bandwidth. I performed the test wit
Joao Barros wrote:
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ADSL connection at home.
When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
far so good.
But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
consumed.
The guys in the ISP s
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an ADSL connection at home.
>
> When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
> far so good.
>
> But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
> consumed.
>
> The guys in the ISP say t
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:16:08 Bahman M. wrote:
> How may I know the real bandwidth limits of my connection? Any tool or
> trick? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding something about ADSL bandwidth?
net/bmon is a good tool to see the bandwidth of your local interfaces. Other
then that, bandwi
19 matches
Mail list logo
