On 12/20/2011 2:53 AM, Da Rock wrote:
> On 12/20/11 16:08, Allen wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> *Snipping*
>>
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
>> As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their
>> biggest failing! I've had a system locku
On 12/20/11 16:08, Allen wrote:
On 12/13/2011 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
*Snipping*
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their
biggest failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never
a problem with bsd as logs will o
On 12/13/2011 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
*Snipping*
>> On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their
biggest failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never
a problem with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a
On 12/13/2011 10:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
> We're seeing in 8.1-RELEASE that "nodev" is an invalid option for NFS mounts
> that causes your system to boot into single-user mode. Is this still the case
> in
> 9.0-RC2/3 or has the option been re-added? "nodev" was a valid option in
> 4.11-RELEASE,
--On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 08:54:23 AM -0800 Devin Teske
wrote:
We're seeing in 8.1-RELEASE that "nodev" is an invalid option for NFS
mounts that causes your system to boot into single-user mode. Is this
still the case in 9.0-RC2/3 or has the option been re-added? "nodev" was
a valid
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Da Rock
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 3:55 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: 9.0 install and journaling
>
> O
--On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 09:54:38 AM +1000 Da Rock
wrote:
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a u
On 12/13/11 04:09, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard
fsck.
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with
filling up usr, etc. And root always stays pr
>
> As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
> failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
> with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with
> filling up usr, etc. And root always stays protected! Its saved my life
> a n
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
> > Da Rock wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
> >>> something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard
> >>> fsck.
On 12/12/11 12:05, Foo JH wrote:
On 11/12/2011 6:21 AM, Robison, Dave wrote:
I prefer having separate partitions because it's more in line with
traditional unix systems, and in particular, I don't like letting
users have unlimited access to /tmp.
Pardon the noob question: will using Disk Quota
On 11/12/2011 6:21 AM, Robison, Dave wrote:
I prefer having separate partitions because it's more in line with traditional
unix systems, and in particular, I don't like letting users have unlimited
access to /tmp.
Pardon the noob question: will using Disk Quotas work to limit the damage
http:
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard fsck.
But fsck needs to be run manually- I have users that can't do that,
and the file
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> > SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
> > something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard fsck.
> But fsck needs to be run manually- I have users that can't do that,
> and the filesystem corrupts. Erg
>True. But as a new user it was the separate partitions that attracted
>me, having been burned with linux's megaroot. And a new user would have
>trouble setting up the partitions. Not to mention the break with
>tradition (what is happening to this world)! :)
I prefer having separate partitions be
On 12/11/11 08:14, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
GPT is cool - no problems there. The main thing I want to know is if
I need to run fsck every time the system dies unexpectedly (which is
a higher occurrence on a laptop)? GJournal helps in that it takes
care of that.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
GPT is cool - no problems there. The main thing I want to know is if I need
to run fsck every time the system dies unexpectedly (which is a higher
occurrence on a laptop)? GJournal helps in that it takes care of that. The
growing size of drives is another co
On 12/11/11 08:02, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
On 10/12/2011 11:41 μμ, Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 02:09, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
On 10/12/2011 5:19 μμ, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, R Skinner wrote:
So I went to the handbook. I'm still a little confused though: can
one still setup the u
On 10/12/2011 11:41 μμ, Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 02:09, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
On 10/12/2011 5:19 μμ, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, R Skinner wrote:
So I went to the handbook. I'm still a little confused though: can
one still setup the usr and var (and so forth)? It said you
pos
On 12/11/11 02:09, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
On 10/12/2011 5:19 μμ, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, R Skinner wrote:
So I went to the handbook. I'm still a little confused though: can
one still setup the usr and var (and so forth)? It said you possibly
could, but it escaped me as to how
On 10/12/2011 5:19 μμ, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, R Skinner wrote:
So I went to the handbook. I'm still a little confused though: can
one still setup the usr and var (and so forth)? It said you possibly
could, but it escaped me as to how.
Use the bsdinstall partition editor to
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, R Skinner wrote:
So I went to the handbook. I'm still a little confused though: can one still
setup the usr and var (and so forth)? It said you possibly could, but it
escaped me as to how.
Use the bsdinstall partition editor to manually create the partitions.
I documente
On 10.12.2011 15:44, Da Rock wrote:
So how does soft-update journaling compare to gjournal? I'm using gjournal now
and it runs a bit of a dog, but it is reliable (until another ufs filesystem
turns up at boot) and necessary in my environment. Can I dump it for this new
one?
Its used on a laptop
On 12/10/11 22:20, RW wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:40:53 +
Frank Shute wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:51:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
possibly could, but it escaped me as to how. And before I do- I
looked up journaling on 9. I couldn't quite get to the bottom of
whether it is or isn't
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:40:53 +
Frank Shute wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:51:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
> > possibly could, but it escaped me as to how. And before I do- I
> > looked up journaling on 9. I couldn't quite get to the bottom of
> > whether it is or isn't available/standard
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:51:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
>
> I bit the bullet and installed the rc3, after spending half the day
> fighting to get atheros 9285 working on a new laptop. I have to do
> another as well, so...
>
> After recovering myself from the shock of the new bsdinstall (not b
27 matches
Mail list logo
