Not sure if this is supported..
Looks like the card is an HP Smart Array B110i..
But when setup as raid 0+1 in the bios.. FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 says it can
not find any disks..
Anyone have this working?
Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions
1 RAID, If one of them fails, the RAID will be down until
u replace the HD in question...
So my question is, if I am right above, what are de benefits of
mounting a RAID 0+1 ??
For workloads that involve streaming large volumes of sequential data
RAID 0+1 can perform very well. However, for t
fails, the RAID will be down until
u replace the HD in question...
So my question is, if I am right above, what are de benefits of
mounting a RAID 0+1 ??
Cheers!
--
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org | Against proprietary
> -Original Message-
> From: Nejc Škoberne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:06 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: 'User Questions'
> Subject: Re: RAID 0+1
>
>
> Hey,
>
> > don't use gmirror and atacontrol at the sa
Hey,
don't use gmirror and atacontrol at the same time. Use one or the other.
I don't. As I said:
> Then I would merge the second
> slice of all 4 drives into a 0+1 array (first gstriping and
> then gmirroring them). I somehow succeeded this, but I also
> get a WARNING when booting the syste
don't use gmirror and atacontrol at the same time. Use one or the other.
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Nejc Škoberne
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:51 AM
> To: User Questions
> Subject: RAID 0
hough.
Is there any "more proper" way to build such a system with RAID 0+1?
Thanks,
Nejc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:54:20 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>At 05:33 PM 4/25/2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>I would start by turning off Hyperthreading as
>>that only really works if you are using the ULE scheduler and thats
>>broken under RELENG_5.
>
>I haven't noticed this ment
At 05:33 PM 4/25/2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I would start by turning off Hyperthreading as
that only really works if you are using the ULE scheduler and thats
broken under RELENG_5.
I haven't noticed this mentioned before. Is using an SMP kernel on a
system with a single P4 and SCHED_4BSD a waste o
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:22:15 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hardware
you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm looking for a good raid controller, with good driver support,
>something I could really rely on !
>
>
>I have some problems with my 3ware 8006-2 on freebsd 5.3 branch.
>Actually the box is a p4-3000 hy
Hello All,
I am unsure where to post this.
I have a Maxtor Nas 4000 w/4 drives. It recently took a dive for the worse, maxtor
gives no support, except to try to mount it. I tried and was unsuccessful, i
consitantly get super block erros.
I was able to get this from Maxtor:
1. os = freebsd 2.
Hello All,
I am unsure where to post this.
I have a Maxtor Nas 4000 w/4 drives. It recently took a dive for the
worse, maxtor gives no support, except to try to mount it. I tried and was
unsuccessful, i consitantly get super block erros.
I was able to get this from Maxtor:
1. os = freebsd 2.05.
Hello All,
I am unsure where to post this.
I have a Maxtor Nas 4000 w/4 drives. It recently took a dive for the worse, Maxtor
gives no support, except to try to mount it. I tried and was unsuccessful; I
consistently get super block errors.
I was able to get this from Maxtor:
1. o
13 matches
Mail list logo
