Hi!
I have a raid problem ... one of the subdisk is missing and i can't
mount my partition.
FreeBSD testhost 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:36:49
UTC 2010 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# gvinum printconfig
# Vinum configuration of ala
Hello,
How does one configure gvinum for RAID 5+0 (distributed parity nested in
stripe)? The configuration I've tried seems to be incorrect.
Config:
drive a device /dev/ad10
drive b device /dev/ad12
drive c device /dev/ad14
drive d device /dev/ad4
drive e device /dev/ad6
drive f device
just because it's not part of FreeBSD. why - i don't know
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Peter wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
unpack tar.gz, compile, load kernel module and use graid5 tool :)
I was going to say initially "I feel like I am back in Linux - no ports,
download compile, test :-))", However
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> unpack tar.gz, compile, load kernel module and use graid5 tool :)
>
I was going to say initially "I feel like I am back in Linux - no ports,
download compile, test :-))", However looking at
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html, I started to think that
maybe for
unpack tar.gz, compile, load kernel module and use graid5 tool :)
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Peter wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
search geom_raid5 in google.
i don't know why it's not yet integrated in FreeBSD.
I did search even earlier today, but all I got was wikipedia article +
some forums post
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> search geom_raid5 in google.
>
> i don't know why it's not yet integrated in FreeBSD.
>
I did search even earlier today, but all I got was wikipedia article +
some forums posts with some patches(nothing like ports or anything).
any tutorial, howto, help will be highly appr
search geom_raid5 in google.
i don't know why it's not yet integrated in FreeBSD.
it works
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Peter wrote:
hello,
What is the easiest way to achieve RAID-5 in freebsd aprt for Vinum ?
I plan to use 1 x 250 GB (no mirroring) + 3 x 1.5 TB in RAID 5
Is there an
hello,
What is the easiest way to achieve RAID-5 in freebsd aprt for Vinum ?
I plan to use 1 x 250 GB (no mirroring) + 3 x 1.5 TB in RAID 5
Is there any tutorial about it ? Handbook does not look very promising :-)
Peter
___
freebsd-questions
2008/10/15 Nejc Skoberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
>
> > the drives to the other machine and try to make them online again. Do you
> > think I should try?
>
> If I were you, I would first buy/get a XXX GB SATA drive, create a
> filesystem there
> and copy all three disks block-by-block as three
> > > I like Intel as much as I like AMD
> >
> > That is your right. Inthell has a long history of buggy products,
> > attempting to hide/ignore bugs, poor customer support, outright
> > theft, etc. AMD isn't perfect, but the list of bad things is far
> > far shorter. And there are other compan
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:28:43PM +0100, Dieter wrote:
> > > My personal approach to avoiding data loss is (a) avoid buggy things like
> > > inthell and linux.
> >
> > Interesting, being as we have another thread going as of late that seems
> > to link transparent data loss with AMD AM2-based sys
> > My personal approach to avoiding data loss is (a) avoid buggy things like
> > inthell and linux.
>
> Interesting, being as we have another thread going as of late that seems
> to link transparent data loss with AMD AM2-based systems with certain
> models of Adaptec and possibly LSI Logic contr
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:14:42AM +0100, Dieter wrote:
> > FreeBSD 7.0-Release
> > Intel D975XBX2 motherboard (Intel Matrix Storage Technology)
> > 3 WD Raptor 74 GB in a RAID 5 array
> > 1 WD Raptor 150 GB as a standalone disk
> > / and /var mounted on the standal
> FreeBSD 7.0-Release
> Intel D975XBX2 motherboard (Intel Matrix Storage Technology)
> 3 WD Raptor 74 GB in a RAID 5 array
> 1 WD Raptor 150 GB as a standalone disk
> / and /var mounted on the standalone,, /usr on the RAID 5
> I believe what happened was that one of the disks
Hello,
> the drives to the other machine and try to make them online again. Do you
> think I should try?
If I were you, I would first buy/get a XXX GB SATA drive, create a filesystem
there
and copy all three disks block-by-block as three separate files (which will be
the size of the disks). This
don't think should be possible. I "lost" all
> > three
> > > disks in my RAID 5 array simultaneously after approx. two years without
> > any
> > > problem. And I fear I will never see my data again. But I really hope
> > some
> > > of you clever
2008/10/15 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Something happened that I don't think should be possible. I "lost" all
> three
> > disks in my RAID 5 a
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Something happened that I don't think should be possible. I "lost" all three
> disks in my RAID 5 array simultaneously after approx. two years without any
> problem. And I fear I wil
Dear list,
Something happened that I don't think should be possible. I "lost" all three
disks in my RAID 5 array simultaneously after approx. two years without any
problem. And I fear I will never see my data again. But I really hope some
of you clever persons can give me some hint
Dear Listmates,
Is it possible to configure vinum for balancing the mileage between two and
three non-volatile storage devices of a different size
I have read the manual thoroughly and noticed that the are certain restrictions
applied to the hard drive sizes in the proposed RAID5 data handling
My problem is aligning reads/writes properly on a 3 disk RAID-5 volume
with stripe size of 16384. Since my measurements all show the same
relatively low read/write performance on the volume matter which offset
i choose on the disklabel "partition" (i've tried with the granulari
= =
The vinum volume is set in a Raid 5 configuration. Here is how it's
configured:
drive d1 device /dev/ad4s1h
drive d2 device /dev/ad5s1h
drive d3 device /dev/ad6s1h
volume datastore
plex org raid5 256k
subdisk length 185g
drive d1
subdisk le
Hi,
I've found out that gvinum won't let you grow a RAID 5 system without
obliterating it first. Something that I haven't been able to
ascertain is if gvinum will let you add discs to a RAID 5 array later
on as hot spares?
Many thanks for so
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
>
>>> How can I do that? When I use sysinstall to create my partitions it
>>> automatically create's it as da0s1d.
>> Use:
>>
>> bsdlabel -e da0s1
>>
>>
> There's also a trick you can use in sysinstall. It will only ever
>
Frank Wissmann wrote:
> Well, I think if you boot your computer from a cdrom and edit with
> bsdlabel you get into an editor where you can change the d into an a.
> That must be the solution you want.
>
> Regards
>
> Frank
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebs
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
How can I do that? When I use sysinstall to create my partitions it
automatically create's it as da0s1d.
Use:
bsdlabel -e da0s1
There's also a trick you can use in sysinstall. It will only ever
assign an "a" partition to /. So if you ha
Well, I think if you boot your computer from a cdrom and edit with
bsdlabel you get into an editor where you can change the d into an a.
That must be the solution you want.
Regards
Frank
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> Frank Wissmann wrote:
>> FreeBSD boots by default from the a-partition and IMK you can't change
>> this. Try to setup your rootdev as disk0s1a instead of disk0s1d and it
>> will work.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Frank
>>
> How ca
Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> Frank Wissmann wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD boots by default from the a-partition and IMK you can't change
>> this. Try to setup your rootdev as disk0s1a instead of disk0s1d and it
>> will work.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>
> How can I do that? When I use sysinstall to c
Frank Wissmann wrote:
> FreeBSD boots by default from the a-partition and IMK you can't change
> this. Try to setup your rootdev as disk0s1a instead of disk0s1d and it
> will work.
>
> Regards
>
> Frank
>
How can I do that? When I use sysinstall to create my partitions it
automatically create's it
FreeBSD boots by default from the a-partition and IMK you can't change
this. Try to setup your rootdev as disk0s1a instead of disk0s1d and it
will work.
Regards
Frank
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Hello,
I purchased a RocketRaid card + 3 disks, and moved my FreeBSD 6.1 to it
using dump, I then changed my fstab
entry to use da0s1d for /, I made sure that the it is bootable, I told
my raid controller to be bootable, I set it up to boot in my BIOS as the
first device, I added the kernel module
reboot in single-user mode, fsck found 200+ errors (a lot of
soft updates inconsistencies, plus others), but corrected them
apparently well. At the next reboot, except a few things, everything
works fine, but this is quite frightening.
The server has an INTEL SRCU42L card, with RAID 5, firmware
2.
On 2007/03/21 6:33, John Nielsen seems to have typed:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 03:03:53 am Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
>> I am about to switch to software raid 5 for my personal server. I know
>> hardware raid 5 is better, but being a student I'd rather not invest in
>> a
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 03:03:53 am Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> I am about to switch to software raid 5 for my personal server. I know
> hardware raid 5 is better, but being a student I'd rather not invest in
> a raid adapter now, plus my cpu is being used at about 0.0% 24/24 7/7,
Hello,
I am about to switch to software raid 5 for my personal server. I know
hardware raid 5 is better, but being a student I'd rather not invest in
a raid adapter now, plus my cpu is being used at about 0.0% 24/24 7/7,
so it needs some exercise :-)
I've heard of several soft
Michael L. Squires wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Felix 'buebo' Kakrow wrote:
Hello List,
I tried gvinum RAID-5 with a 5-Stable around the time when 5.1 or 5.2
was released (afair) and back then it basically sucked big time. Raid
worked as long as nothing failed, but reconstructing a
On 2006/11/15 11:58, Michael L. Squires seems to have typed:
> I did find a posting by someone who installed gvinum/RAID5 recently (under
> 6.X) but there was nothing about stability.
In my experience gvinum is stable until a drive fails.
Good luck and let us know what happens!
__
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Felix 'buebo' Kakrow wrote:
Hello List,
I tried gvinum RAID-5 with a 5-Stable around the time when 5.1 or 5.2
was released (afair) and back then it basically sucked big time. Raid
worked as long as nothing failed, but reconstructing a drive was
somewhere be
Hi,
I tried gvinum RAID-5 with a 5-Stable around the time when 5.1 or 5.2
was released (afair) and back then it basically sucked big time. Raid
worked as long as nothing failed, but reconstructing a drive was
somewhere between very painful and not possible.
I agree.
Now I will have to
Hello List,
I tried gvinum RAID-5 with a 5-Stable around the time when 5.1 or 5.2
was released (afair) and back then it basically sucked big time. Raid
worked as long as nothing failed, but reconstructing a drive was
somewhere between very painful and not possible.
Now I will have to upgrade
On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Telting wrote:
I just wanted to get it straight. I think I read some post that
said that 3ware actually has and uses commit access to the freebsd
source tree. Can anyone comfirm this for me?
I currently have a highpoint 2220 controller. I got it because of
I just wanted to get it straight. I think I read some post that said
that 3ware actually has and uses commit access to the freebsd source
tree. Can anyone comfirm this for me?
I currently have a highpoint 2220 controller. I got it because of the
Freebsd support what appeared to be available
versions of FreeBSD on one machine. I'd like to be
able to mount the same raid 5 set on either OS.
IJ
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
ksys Wireless-G USB network adapter, and Integrated
> Adaptec AIC-7892 SCSI controller.
>
> I would like to setup RAID 5. The intended use is in my home network as
> a personal SOA/J2EE/MySQL development box and family file server.
>
> Please review and comment on my assumptions
controller.
I would like to setup RAID 5. The intended use is in my home network as
a personal SOA/J2EE/MySQL development box and family file server.
Please review and comment on my assumptions:
1) FreeBSD 6-STABLE has fixed any 5.X SMP issues.
2) I will need an additional RAID controller card.
3
Hello there,
I have a Dell Power Edge 2400 system with 4 X 18 GB SCSI Drives. I would
like to use a software Raid 5 using FreeBSD 5.4. Any suggestions on how to
go about doing it? I have read so many articles, it makes my head hurt.
There are many options, for mirroring, but some are better
Try regenerating the array and put it in striped mode, rather than raid-5
redundant mode, and see what happens. You might also try setting it
up as a mirror raid-0/1 and test. I'm sure everyone here would be
interested
in the results, I know I would.
Ted
>-Original Message---
On another note, I've ran diskinfo test and these are the results, much better
but still the RAID-5 slower than a single drive:
impala# diskinfo -t aacd1
aacd1
512 # sectorsize
146781044736# mediasize in bytes (137G)
286681728 # mediasize in se
Hello,
I've just ran Bonnie on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with Adaptec 2230SLP RAID-5 SCSI
Card and Seagate 146GB 10K RPM U320 drives.
The results were very surprising. The RAID-5 is EXTREMELY slow, and I can't
figure out why!
The RAID controller has two volumes: RAID-5 and a lone dr
Solved. Something in the BIOS. I reset to defaults, then re-configured.
Only thing that's different is that it boots now.
Derek
Derek Flenniken wrote:
I am able to install with no problems. RAID5 "Drive" is visible for
slice creation, partition.
Use Entire Disk + Set Bootable
FreeBSD Boot M
I am able to install with no problems. RAID5 "Drive" is visible for
slice creation, partition.
Use Entire Disk + Set Bootable
FreeBSD Boot Manager
Default Partition Scheme
If I install again I see my slice and partitions from the previous install.
I've gone through the configurations with the
Matt Virus wrote:
darren david wrote:
hey all-
in the somewhat pending case that i may not be able to retrieve my
data from RAID 5 unit, I'm wondering what my best option is for
blocksize on a .75TB RAID 5 volume. does the 64k RAID stripe size have
any impact on these figures? I
darren david wrote:
hey all-
in the somewhat pending case that i may not be able to retrieve my data
from RAID 5 unit, I'm wondering what my best option is for blocksize on
a .75TB RAID 5 volume. does the 64k RAID stripe size have any impact on
these figures? It was previously set t
darren david wrote:
hey all-
in the somewhat pending case that i may not be able to retrieve my data
from RAID 5 unit, I'm wondering what my best option is for blocksize on
a .75TB RAID 5 volume. does the 64k RAID stripe size have any impact on
these figures? It was previously set t
hey all-
in the somewhat pending case that i may not be able to retrieve my data
from RAID 5 unit, I'm wondering what my best option is for blocksize on
a .75TB RAID 5 volume. does the 64k RAID stripe size have any impact on
these figures? It was previously set to the default( 16384 bloc
Jayesh Jayan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had disturbed you all with some doubts regarding freebsd before.
>
> Now i have servers up and running.
>
> I am using the monitoring tool named nagios for checking the services run on
> the server.
>
> Now i am in need of a software or so to monitor the RAID har
Hi,
I had disturbed you all with some doubts regarding freebsd before.
Now i have servers up and running.
I am using the monitoring tool named nagios for checking the services run on
the server.
Now i am in need of a software or so to monitor the RAID hardware ..
Below is the URL to the sp
There should be no problem creating a filesystem on a raid 5 (hardware or
software) and mounting that as /var or /var/log or whatever.
As for the daily reports, take a look at /etc/mail/aliases I think you can
alias root to multiple email addresses (unsure, never tried)
-Original Message
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:34:10AM -0700, mojo fms wrote:
> I know its doable, how would i go about adding another email that the daily
> reports get sent too? I would still like them to be stored on the system its
> self but also send to another email account.
In /etc/periodic.conf, set daily_s
I know its doable, how would i go about adding another email that the daily
reports get sent too? I would still like them to be stored on the system its
self but also send to another email account.
Raid 5 question, i know in MS Enviroments log files can not be stored on a
striped raid array
Hi all,
I have a dual Opteron box built with
http://tyan.com/products/html/gt24b2891_spec.html , using 4 identical
SATA drives. I plan to use FBSD 6 (installing beta2, cvsup to head). I
will use gmirror to RAID-1 the boot partition, and RAID-5 for the
remainder.
I was wondering which is the
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/21/2005 03:41 PM
To
FreeBSD Questions
cc
Subject
Re: Bootstrapping Raid 5 w/GEOM
Michael Dale wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
>> So, should I
>> 1) Boot up with Disc 1, install minimal config,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:56:39PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:11:18PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > > I want to setup software Raid 5 , and I want it to affect ALL
> > > partitions, including / (so if any one o
Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:11:18PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
I want to setup software Raid 5 , and I want it to affect ALL
partitions, including / (so if any one of the drives fails, it will
still boot up properly). I am planning on using GEOM, but open to
Michael Dale wrote:
Norberto Meijome wrote:
So, should I
1) Boot up with Disc 1, install minimal config, reboot
2) setup GEOM RAID 5 on all the discs ?
3) edit fstab to point to /dev/[what??]/[what else] instead of
/ad0s1[abef] ?
When I installed GEOM for a RAID 1 setup I did the
le -- the loader doesn't know about the mirror
even in a mirrored / setup; it justs treats one of the disks of the mirror
as 'the boot disk'. It's not until the kernel is loaded that gvinum RAID-5
can do something.
So, in your case, the loader would read random RAID-5 data
Norberto Meijome wrote:
So, should I
1) Boot up with Disc 1, install minimal config, reboot
2) setup GEOM RAID 5 on all the discs ?
3) edit fstab to point to /dev/[what??]/[what else] instead of
/ad0s1[abef] ?
When I installed GEOM for a RAID 1 setup I did the following:
Install FreeBSD on
Norberto Meijome wrote:
So, should I
1) Boot up with Disc 1, install minimal config, reboot
2) setup GEOM RAID 5 on all the discs ?
3) edit fstab to point to /dev/[what??]/[what else] instead of
/ad0s1[abef] ?
or
boot up with CD 1, run GEOM, build the raid 5 from here before
installing
ld of Linux)
I want to setup software Raid 5 , and I want it to affect ALL
partitions, including / (so if any one of the drives fails, it will
still boot up properly). I am planning on using GEOM, but open to
suggestions.
See gmirror and geom.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=gmir
nt to setup software Raid 5 , and I want it to affect ALL
partitions, including / (so if any one of the drives fails, it will
still boot up properly). I am planning on using GEOM, but open to
suggestions.
I've been searching and cant find any pointers on how to set this up
properly. I
Hi all,
I have a box with 4 x 120 GB EIDE drives which I want to convert to
FreeBSD 5.4 ( it's an old SNAP 4500 from Snap Appliance, now owned by
Adaptec, running a custom build of Linux)
I want to setup software Raid 5 , and I want it to affect ALL
partitions, including / (so if any o
* Greg 'groggy' Lehey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There have been issues with growfs in the past; last time I looked
> it hadn't been updated to handle UFS 2. If you don't need the UFS 2
> functionality, you might be better off using UFS 1 if you intend to
> grow the file system.
growfs gained
On Tuesday, 10 May 2005 at 16:05:50 -0500, Tony Shadwick wrote:
> I've worked with RAID5 in FreeBSD in the past, with either vinum or a
> hardware raid solution. Never had any problems either way.
>
> I'm now building a server for myself at home, and I'm creating a large
> volume to store video.
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Subhro wrote:
On 5/11/2005 19:33, Tony Shadwick wrote:
The problem I've had in the past in Windows for example:
Drive D: is a RAID5 volume, 400GB, nearly full. If I add a 200GB drive to
the array, the 'disk' that Drive D: resides on is now ~600GB, but Drive D:
will remain 40
On 5/11/2005 19:33, Tony Shadwick wrote:
The problem I've had in the past in Windows for example:
Drive D: is a RAID5 volume, 400GB, nearly full. If I add a 200GB
drive to the array, the 'disk' that Drive D: resides on is now ~600GB,
but Drive D: will remain 400GB. I would have to utilize a thi
The problem I've had in the past in Windows for example:
Drive D: is a RAID5 volume, 400GB, nearly full. If I add a 200GB drive to
the array, the 'disk' that Drive D: resides on is now ~600GB, but Drive D:
will remain 400GB. I would have to utilize a third party piece of
software to resize Dri
On 5/11/2005 2:35, Tony Shadwick wrote:
What my concern is when I start to fill up the ~400GB of space I'm
giving myself with this set. I would like to simply insert another
200GB drive and expand the array, allowing the hardware raid to do the
work.
That is what everybody does. It is very much
I've worked with RAID5 in FreeBSD in the past, with either vinum or a
hardware raid solution. Never had any problems either way.
I'm now building a server for myself at home, and I'm creating a large
volume to store video. I have purchased 3 200GB EIDE hard drives, and a 6
channel Promise SX6
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alvaro Rosales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:54:56 -0500
Subject: FreeBSD wont boot after restoring RAID 5
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hello guys,
I had a problem with my raid 5 array and I had to replace one of the
disk
Hello guys,
I had a problem with my raid 5 array and I had to replace one of the
disks, the utility to restore the array worked fine , all the 3 disks
are ok, but the system doesn't boot, I have looked at the contents of
the disks using the fixit CD and the data seems ok, but I dont know
h
to install a IDE HD with
Freebsd 4.6 on it, boot up the server and attempt to retrieve the database
backups from the messed-up raid-5 HDDS that I stored in a /usr/home/backup
folder.
dmesg says:
da0 at asr0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: Tagged Queueing Enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I had a Proliant 5000 that I gutted a while back, and I
am putting the RAID 5 card and enclosure in my
Alpha PC164. When I try to boot the pc164, it hangs
at loading the kernel.
All it says is:
Entering kernel at 0xfc33a6c0...
And hangs. The
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 03:02:25PM +0800, H. Sandring wrote:
> Is there an intelligent way of choosing the stripe size of a RAID 5
> array?
From man vinum:
"For optimum performance, stripes should be at least 128 kB in size: anything
smaller will result in a significant incr
Dear list
Is there an intelligent way of choosing the stripe size of a RAID 5
array?
TIA
zheyu
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> First off, most of the people in the FreeBSD lists can get fairly upset
> when they see people cross-posting to more than one list at a time.
Sorry, i got the point. I just thought it was related to both list.
Apperantly i thought wrong.
> You'd be better off cloning the RAID array, say to per
> If i am running raid5 on 3ware can i use the same disk array as
> raid5 on, for example, high point controller without rebuilding
> the array, just reattching disks to a new controller? Basically,
> i am asking if raid5 is a industrially standard or every manufacturer
> adds something to its spec
Hello!
If i am running raid5 on 3ware can i use the same disk array as
raid5 on, for example, high point controller without rebuilding
the array, just reattching disks to a new controller? Basically,
i am asking if raid5 is a industrially standard or every manufacturer
adds something to its specs.
My RAID-5 array seems to have died this weekend. After coming back from
a motorcycle-riding class, I noticed my internet connection was down. I
hooked up a monitor and a keyboard to my FreeBSD box, and noticed that
the OS was no longer running, that the computer had rebooted, and that
the BIOS
My RAID-5 array seems to have died this weekend. After coming back from
a motorcycle-riding class, I noticed my internet connection was down. I
hooked up a monitor and a keyboard to my FreeBSD box, and noticed that
the OS was no longer running, that the computer had rebooted, and that
the BIOS
On Jan 29, 2004, at 5:12 AM, Artem Koutchine wrote:
Hi!
I am looking for supported RAID 5 controller for FreeBSD and
I am very puzzled after reading all the specs and descrioptions.
I haven't found any SATA RAID 5 controller in the FreeBSD
supported Hardware list, but some manufacturer
Hi!
I am looking for supported RAID 5 controller for FreeBSD and
I am very puzzled after reading all the specs and descrioptions.
I haven't found any SATA RAID 5 controller in the FreeBSD
supported Hardware list, but some manufacturer claim they
support FreeBSD.
SO far i have found
1) Pr
Hi All,
Still scouting around for a raid 5 card, and found this little beauty!
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/rr1640.htm
Looking through their web site, and it looks impressive, in that they
actually actively support FreeBSD!
Anyone tried out the 154x, 1640 or 1820 products with FreeBSD 4.x
Hi,
I have seen both the Promise and 3ware raid cards mentioned over time in
this mailing list.
I would like to be able to run a 1-2TB raid 5 SATA on FreeBSD 4.9. Is
anyone using a card from these suppliers?
Will FreeBSD install on a Raid 5 array (after it has been configured in the
Array BIOS
On Friday, 3 October 2003 at 10:49:30 -0700, billn wrote:
> Plus some other questions. I'm currently unable to get vinum to work in
> FreeBSD 4.8, even after careful reading of the docs.
>
> 4.8 is giving me "Operation Not Permitted" when I attempt to start
> vinum. I've read the 4.8 specific sect
Are you root ?
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, billn wrote:
> Plus some other questions. I'm currently unable to get vinum to work in
> FreeBSD 4.8, even after careful reading of the docs.
>
> 4.8 is giving me "Operation Not Permitted" when I attempt to start
> vinum. I've read the 4.8 specific section in t
Plus some other questions. I'm currently unable to get vinum to work in
FreeBSD 4.8, even after careful reading of the docs.
4.8 is giving me "Operation Not Permitted" when I attempt to start
vinum. I've read the 4.8 specific section in the docs, followed it.
Still no joy.
Muchly thanks for any
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> I'm trying to find out how to replace a drive in a vinum RAID-5 volume
> that's still working. I have the following volume (copied by hand, sorry):
>
> V local State: up Plexes: 1 Si
Hi,
I'm trying to find out how to replace a drive in a vinum RAID-5 volume
that's still working. I have the following volume (copied by hand, sorry):
V local State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 167 GB
P local.p0 R5 State: up Subdisks:
[moved to -questions; this isn't a file system issue]
On Thursday, 28 August 2003 at 11:52:44 +0800, Francis A. Vidal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm configuring a RAID-5 filesystem on a Pentium III 1Ghz machine (FreeBSD
> 4.9-PRERELEASE). The disks are "dangerously
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
