Well, I'm not so worried about crashes, the only crashes I've had with
BSD are with power failures, and this is a notebook :-)
I was planning on having three "slices" on the drive, the first I
would blast from a linux or BSD image as needed, the second would be
ext2 or ext3 (or other?) and have "
On Friday 30 June 2006 17:44, Jim Stapleton wrote:
> I have to move between BSD and Linux on one system quite a bit, and I
> was wondering if there were any reasons to avoid EXT3 on a filesystem
> (such as /dev/ad0s1), as opposed to using the more standard BSD setups
> (such as UFS on /dev/ad0s1a)
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:44:21 -0400
"Jim Stapleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to move between BSD and Linux on one system quite a bit, and I
> was wondering if there were any reasons to avoid EXT3 on a filesystem
> (such as /dev/ad0s1), as opposed to using the more standard BSD setups
>
I have to move between BSD and Linux on one system quite a bit, and I
was wondering if there were any reasons to avoid EXT3 on a filesystem
(such as /dev/ad0s1), as opposed to using the more standard BSD setups
(such as UFS on /dev/ad0s1a)? I'm thinking mostly in terms of
reliability, but also in
