Lord Raiden wrote:
These are kernel threads. 5.x is more modular than 4.x and a lot
of functionality has been moved to internal threads (for the sake
of SMP). There's really nothing wrong with this; esp. since the
number of threads is still pretty small :)
The kernel may create more such threads if
These are kernel threads. 5.x is more modular than 4.x and a lot
of functionality has been moved to internal threads (for the sake
of SMP). There's really nothing wrong with this; esp. since the
number of threads is still pretty small :)
The kernel may create more such threads if it needs them; li
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 12:14:26AM -0400, Alexander Chamandy wrote:
> On 4/25/05, Lord Raiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all. Looking for some info about some processes I've got
> > running on my box. I'm new to 5.3 having used the 4x line for a long time
> > and I'm curious about
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:18:30PM -0400, Lord Raiden wrote:
> Hi all. Looking for some info about some processes I've got
> running on my box. I'm new to 5.3 having used the 4x line for a long time
> and I'm curious about my process list. When I do "ps -ax" I get the
> following list
Most of those processes are used by the kernel, some of them, if you
aren't using the specific hardware or functionality they provide (such
as USB or ktrace) can be disabled by compiling your own kernel (see
here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/kernelconfig.html).
While this
On 4/25/05, Lord Raiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. Looking for some info about some processes I've got
> running on my box. I'm new to 5.3 having used the 4x line for a long time
> and I'm curious about my process list. When I do "ps -ax" I get the
> following list as seen bel
Hi all. Looking for some info about some processes I've got
running on my box. I'm new to 5.3 having used the 4x line for a long time
and I'm curious about my process list. When I do "ps -ax" I get the
following list as seen below. Are all of these items really needed and if
not, wh
