Re: Question about the RELENG_5 branch ...

2005-07-01 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 7/1/05, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was under the impression that the only patches being back ported > in 5.4-RELEASE are from the security team to fix security related > issues. Do patches that resolve problems that are known to cause panics > get back ported as well? >

Re: Question about the RELENG_5 branch ...

2005-07-01 Thread Matthew Grooms
I was under the impression that the only patches being back ported in 5.4-RELEASE are from the security team to fix security related issues. Do patches that resolve problems that are known to cause panics get back ported as well? Thanks for the reply, Matthew Grooms Nikolas Britton wrot

Re: Question about the RELENG_5 branch ...

2005-07-01 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 7/1/05, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a > bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name for > the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something completely different? > I have a produ

Re: Question about the RELENG_5 branch ...

2005-07-01 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-07-01 10:37, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a > bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name > for the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something completely > different? Yes, RELEN

Question about the RELENG_5 branch ...

2005-07-01 Thread Matthew Grooms
All, I understand the difference between STABLE and CURRENT but I am a bit confused about the RELENG_5 branch. Is this just another name for the 5.x STABLE branch or is it used for something completely different? I have a production server that is running 5.4-RELEASE but requires a few s