Re: Ports renaming

2003-02-06 Thread local.freebsd.questions
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:07:40 - , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Weinberger) wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >>> (02.05.2003 @ 0248 PST): local.freebsd.questions said, in 0.3K: << >> Anyone like to shed any light on why a lot of the >> multimedia ports seem to be getting rename

Re: Ports renaming

2003-02-05 Thread Adam Weinberger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> (02.05.2003 @ 0248 PST): local.freebsd.questions said, in 0.3K: << > Anyone like to shed any light on why a lot of the > multimedia ports seem to be getting renamed recently? Such as? > I see -esound appearing as a suffix on a lot of package > nam

Ports renaming

2003-02-05 Thread local.freebsd.questions
Anyone like to shed any light on why a lot of the multimedia ports seem to be getting renamed recently? I see -esound appearing as a suffix on a lot of package names (frinstance xmms). And I don't have Enlightentment installed. jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe