Is there any way to get portmaster to reinstall every port in the *EXACT*
same order they where installed in, preferably with out any knowledge of
what ports where installed after the current one was the reason for
asking is many times it seems that subtle incompatibilities solely due to
either
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:19:57AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:40:58PM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What is the proper method to pass configure arguments when installing a
> > port?
>
> While you can supply arguments on the command line, it is hard to
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Grant Peel wrote:
What is the proper method to pass configure arguments when installing
a port?
example, I am trying to build exim with mysql and spf support
make -D "WITH_SPF=YES" -D "WITH_MYSQL=YES"
I think for this example the proper syntax would be:
make -DWITH_SP
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:40:58PM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the proper method to pass configure arguments when installing a
> port?
While you can supply arguments on the command line, it is hard to
remember.
Therefore I think it is best to set arguments in make.conf. For e
Hi all,
What is the proper method to pass configure arguments when installing a
port?
example, I am trying to build exim with mysql and spf support
make -D "WITH_SPF=YES" -D "WITH_MYSQL=YES"
Please help,
been struggling with this for what seems like forever.
-Grant
_
James Harrison wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 12:02 -0600, Darryl Hoar wrote:
Greetings,
I am looking to install a CMS system (something like postnuke) and want to
have a blog component.
Anybody have any recommendations ? If it is in the ports, it would be even
better.
thanks,
Darryl
I've bee
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 12:02 -0600, Darryl Hoar wrote:
> Greetings,
> I am looking to install a CMS system (something like postnuke) and want to
> have a blog component.
>
> Anybody have any recommendations ? If it is in the ports, it would be even
> better.
>
> thanks,
> Darryl
I've been using
Greetings,
I am looking to install a CMS system (something like postnuke) and want to
have a blog component.
Anybody have any recommendations ? If it is in the ports, it would be even
better.
thanks,
Darryl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
Holy Moly this is really cool!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:24:00 -0800
"Nerius Landys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to run compiz-fusion on my desktop. I've already installed the
> x11-wm/compiz-fusion port from sources; it all installed well. Since my
> internet search for how to actually run the thing on FreeBSD ran p
Nerius Landys wrote:
I hope this is the right list for this topic.
I'm trying to run compiz-fusion on my desktop. I've already installed the
x11-wm/compiz-fusion port from sources; it all installed well. Since my
internet search for how to actually run the thing on FreeBSD ran pretty dry,
I've
I hope this is the right list for this topic.
I'm trying to run compiz-fusion on my desktop. I've already installed the
x11-wm/compiz-fusion port from sources; it all installed well. Since my
internet search for how to actually run the thing on FreeBSD ran pretty dry,
I've been trying to follow i
On 8/29/07, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nikola Lecic wrote:
>
> > C) port it!
> >
> > is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for
> > Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and
> > for others.
>
> It's already been done. I don't k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nikola Lecic wrote:
> C) port it!
>
> is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for
> Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and
> for others.
It's already been done. I don't know why the port is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Kurt Buff wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
> Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant
>
> I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
> p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:22:39 -0700
"Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
> Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant
>
> I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
> p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-L
I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant
I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.
Can I:
A) leave the script as-is, and simply install one or t
Thanks Bill. I use the port upgrade suit for all of my port management
needs. I guess what I can do is just pkg_info the pkg I am going to
delete then see if I need the deps or not and un-install them as well.
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to "Placid Publishing, LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
S
In response to "Placid Publishing, LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Say I have a new system with nothing installed on it yet from the ports
> collection. Lets say I install Apache and lets say it requires php,
> python, perl, and ruby. Now lets say I uninstall Apache with "pkg_delete
> Apache". Will
Say I have a new system with nothing installed on it yet from the ports
collection. Lets say I install Apache and lets say it requires php,
python, perl, and ruby. Now lets say I uninstall Apache with "pkg_delete
Apache". Will it remove php, python, perl, and ruby? Or will it leave
those packag
At 11:09 PM 4/12/2006, you wrote:
question on . ports collection. I read in the handbook that the
cvsup tag for the ports-* collection should be ".". "In particular,
use only tag=. for the ports-* collections."
As I understand it, there is no "most recent version of port that
still works
I just have a quick question on some of the documentation I have read
about FreeBSD and it's ports collection. I read in the handbook that
the cvsup tag for the ports-* collection should be ".".
"In particular, use only tag=. for the ports-* collections."
However, when I was reading the ports
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Wow, I stopped following this thread for a few hours and now I can just
compile a mini-ports howto. ^^ So, first things first: thanks for all who
replied. All replies were meaningful, so thank you all.
Kevin, what I didn't know was the fact that ports and packa
On Monday 27 March 2006 17:02, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
> On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
> > On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > > make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
> > > you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
> > > co
Wow, I stopped following this thread for a few hours and now I can just
compile a mini-ports howto. ^^ So, first things first: thanks for all who
replied. All replies were meaningful, so thank you all.
Kevin, what I didn't know was the fact that ports and packages share the
same database. Knowing
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
> On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
> > you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
> > counter-intuitive, but really handy)
>
> Make package creates a pack
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
> >Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
> >
> >So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
> >generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what wil
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> make package will actually make the package and install it for you, you
> dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit counter-intuitive, but
> really handy)
Make package creates a package out of an installed port (it will install the
p
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
happen for example (supposing I install everything from pack
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:57:49 -0300
"Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
np :)
>
> So if a port may override a package,
a port and a package are the same thing, in a different form :). the
tree structure u
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
happen for example (supposing I install everything from packages - or
"make package" then pkg_add
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:15:07 -0400
Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the installation process install any package that may be
> overriden by any port?
yes. for example ,you select to install bash-3 from sysinstall ( " the
freebsd installer UI" ). this reads and installs the package
b
Duane Whitty wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: package vs ports question
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:57:04 -0300
From: Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Original Message
Subject:Re: package vs ports question
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:57:04 -0300
From: Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Huy Ton That wrote:
I am curious, the key different between packages and ports are that packages
are precompiled and ports are not? Am I erroneous in this statement? I'm a
little confused as I have been always using make install clean from the
ports and don't see the difference... Has anyone e
I am curious, the key different between packages and ports are that packages
are precompiled and ports are not? Am I erroneous in this statement? I'm a
little confused as I have been always using make install clean from the
ports and don't see the difference... Has anyone else had the same
quest
work it
out. Oh well!
On 10/8/05, Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:46:54 -0700, Greg Maruszeczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: sendmail/postfix ports question
> Wrote these words of wisdom:
>
> > Matt Singerman wrote:
>
On Thursday 20 October 2005 16:35, makisupa wrote:
> Thanks for the reply...
>
> My ports tree is up to date -- i believe the "problem" (if you want to
> call it that) is that I installed gnome 2.12 from package at marcuscom
> (on a 6.0 RC1 system -- i needed 6.0 for some HW issues). I therefore
>
Thanks for the reply...
My ports tree is up to date -- i believe the "problem" (if you want to
call it that) is that I installed gnome 2.12 from package at marcuscom
(on a 6.0 RC1 system -- i needed 6.0 for some HW issues). I therefore
have newer versions of certain files than many of the ports i
On Thursday 20 October 2005 15:25, makisupa wrote:
> How would you install a port that had dependencies that were older than
> identical items on your system?
>
> For example, you install portx that requires depend1.1 -- you have
> depend1.2 on your system.
This will happen if you have an out-of
How would you install a port that had dependencies that were older than
identical items on your system?
For example, you install portx that requires depend1.1 -- you have
depend1.2 on your system. Running 'make install clean' will generate an
error code stating that you have an OLDER version --
On 10/14/05, makisupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What good will portupgrade it do here? Obviously I must not
> properly understand what its doing...but in the error message I
> have a newer version of the dependency than the port calls for
> and the port misidentifies this. If there was a newer
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 14:21 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Andrew P. writes:
>
> > > ===> Installing for glib-2.6.6
> > > ===> glib-2.6.6 depends on
file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.7 - found
> > > ===> glib-2.6.6 depends on executable: pkg-config -
Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/13/05, makisupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I seem to be getting myself in trouble repeatedly...I'm sure someone can
help...
Fresh install of 6.0 RC1, gnome 2.12 from marcus's tb, freshly cvsupped
ports. I need to install some little apps like gaim and pan. when
running
> I'd start with installing portupgrade, and trying to
> portupgrade -arR. I'm sure there's another solution,
> though.
What is the use of specifying the 'r' switch when using the 'a'
switch?
# portupgrade -ar
Since all installed ports are targeted wouldn't installed ports that
depend on another
Andrew P. writes:
> > ===> Installing for glib-2.6.6
> > ===> glib-2.6.6 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.7 - found
> > ===> glib-2.6.6 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
> > ===> glib-2.6.6 depends on shared library: intl - found
> > ===> Generating temporary packing
On 10/13/05, makisupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to be getting myself in trouble repeatedly...I'm sure someone can
> help...
>
> Fresh install of 6.0 RC1, gnome 2.12 from marcus's tb, freshly cvsupped
> ports. I need to install some little apps like gaim and pan. when
> running 'make ins
I seem to be getting myself in trouble repeatedly...I'm sure someone can
help...
Fresh install of 6.0 RC1, gnome 2.12 from marcus's tb, freshly cvsupped
ports. I need to install some little apps like gaim and pan. when
running 'make install clean' for these ports i'll get a message that the
corr
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:46:54 -0700, Greg Maruszeczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sendmail/postfix ports question
Wrote these words of wisdom:
> Matt Singerman wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a server running FreeBSD 5.2.1 that provides (amongst other
>
Matt Singerman wrote:
Hello all,
I have a server running FreeBSD 5.2.1 that provides (amongst other
things) MTA services to our office via sendmail. For a variety of a
reasons, I would like to move away from sendmail to postfix. However,
the postfix package cannot, as I am sure you know, simpl
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:16:50AM -0400, Matt Singerman wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a server running FreeBSD 5.2.1 that provides (amongst other
> things) MTA services to our office via sendmail. For a variety of a
> reasons, I would like to move away from sendmail to postfix. However,
> the
Hello all,
I have a server running FreeBSD 5.2.1 that provides (amongst other
things) MTA services to our office via sendmail. For a variety of a
reasons, I would like to move away from sendmail to postfix. However,
the postfix package cannot, as I am sure you know, simply install with
sendmail
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:02:45PM -0500, Tom Moyer wrote:
> Maybe this is not the best place for this (I'm not really sure) but
> would there be a way to setup the ports tree so that when a particular
> package is deinstalled that it's dependancies would be deinstalled if
> they were only installe
Maybe this is not the best place for this (I'm not really sure) but
would there be a way to setup the ports tree so that when a particular
package is deinstalled that it's dependancies would be deinstalled if
they were only installed becasue of the port in the first place. For
example Package X de
Andrew L. Gould wrote:
I noticed that php ports conflict with php-cli ports. Does that mean
you can't do both web and cli programs in php on the same computer? Or
does php include command line capabilities?
Thanks,
Andrew
The standard php4 port installs both mod_php for apache and the cli
I noticed that php ports conflict with php-cli ports. Does that mean
you can't do both web and cli programs in php on the same computer? Or
does php include command line capabilities?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:14:23PM -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> Situation:
> I set up a portal server as per the instructions at their site; it
> involved installing some PERL modules from CPAN, which I have since
> learned on FreeBSD appears to be a no no...
>
> Now I have some updates to d
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Situation:
I set up a portal server as per the instructions at their site; it
involved installing some PERL modules from CPAN, which I have since
learned on FreeBSD appears to be a no no...
Now I have some updates to do, but I don't want it to interfere with
the web port
Situation:
I set up a portal server as per the instructions at their site; it
involved installing some PERL modules from CPAN, which I have since
learned on FreeBSD appears to be a no no...
Now I have some updates to do, but I don't want it to interfere with
the web portal software. In theory,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 05:58:10PM +0300, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
> If I up/downgrade from 4.8 to 4.10 or the other way arround would it
> be a good idea to also recompile all ports?
It shouldn't be necessary. Wouldn't bother if I were you.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J
Hi,
If I up/downgrade from 4.8 to 4.10 or the other way arround would it
be a good idea to also recompile all ports?
Please CC
TIA
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Greetings,
I have 5.1-release installed. I have installed qmail from the ports.
I am following life with qmail-ldap. I am trying to locate the
qmail.schema file. Where can I find the official file ?
I went to the qmail-ldap patch site, but couldn't figure out
which patches were relevant .
any
Dear Andri Kok,
Please put your reply to the buttom and cut out text thats no longer
relevant. This makes the mail more readable for others.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:23:52PM +1000, sAndri Kok wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Thx for he previous replies =) Now, u said that I may not be able to run
> some
>
CC: sAndri Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports question
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:30:53 +0200
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:01:16PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:32:58 +1000
> "sAndri Kok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&g
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 03:01:16PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:32:58 +1000
> "sAndri Kok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I got some questions about ports. Say If I have 2 identical machines.
> > 1 machine running FreeBSD-4.8 and the other is runni
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:32:58 +1000
"sAndri Kok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I got some questions about ports. Say If I have 2 identical machines.
> 1 machine running FreeBSD-4.8 and the other is running FreeBSD-5.2.1.
> I run cvsup on both machines using the default ports supfi
Hi guys,
I got some questions about ports. Say If I have 2 identical machines. 1
machine running FreeBSD-4.8 and the other is running FreeBSD-5.2.1. I run
cvsup on both machines using the default ports supfile given in
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile which points to the same cvsup
mirr
On Monday 05 April 2004 02:03 pm, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:54:37 -0700
>
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |O|>FWIW, I thought I had jumped the gun with my comment and installed
> |O|>apsfilter with no options. I didn't have any problems.
>
> Yes, worked here fine wi
On Monday 05 April 2004 12:37 pm, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:29:38 -0700
>
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |O|>> I have both:
> |O|>>
> |O|>> glib-1.2.10_10 = up-to-date with port
> |O|>> glib-2.2.3_1= up-to-date with
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:29:38 -0700
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|O|>> I have both:
|O|>>
|O|>> glib-1.2.10_10 = up-to-date with port
|O|>> glib-2.2.3_1= up-to-date with port
|O|>>
|O|>
|O|>I missed this part. The latest version is now gli
On Monday 05 April 2004 02:23 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Monday 05 April 2004 12:13 pm, Joshua Lokken wrote:
> > * Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 12:06]:
> > > On Monday 05 April 2004 11:51 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> > > > What would happen if a link called /usr/local/lib/libintl.
On Monday 05 April 2004 12:03 pm, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:54:37 -0700
>
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |O|>FWIW, I thought I had jumped the gun with my comment and
> | installed O|>apsfilter with no options. I didn't have any problems.
>
> Yes, worked here fine w
On Monday 05 April 2004 12:13 pm, Joshua Lokken wrote:
> * Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 12:06]:
> > On Monday 05 April 2004 11:51 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> > > What would happen if a link called /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.5
> > > was created to point to the existing libintl.so.* f
On Monday 05 April 2004 12:03 pm, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:54:37 -0700
>
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |O|>FWIW, I thought I had jumped the gun with my comment and
> | installed O|>apsfilter with no options. I didn't have any problems.
>
> Yes, worked here fine w
* Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 12:06]:
> On Monday 05 April 2004 11:51 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> >
> > What would happen if a link called /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.5 was
> > created to point to the existing libintl.so.* file on Gerry's system?
> >
>
> The library interface was c
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:54:37 -0700
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|O|>FWIW, I thought I had jumped the gun with my comment and installed
|O|>apsfilter with no options. I didn't have any problems.
Yes, worked here fine with only SAMBA as additional selections from the
defaults.
|O|>Gli
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:51 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> On Monday 05 April 2004 01:36 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > On Monday 05 April 2004 11:27 am, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> > > After doing a portupgrade -rf gettext...
> > >
> > > I went back to trying to install the apsfilter port. It would
> > >
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:44 am, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:36:42 -0700
>
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |O|>No, it means you didn't do a
> |O|>portupgrade -rf gettext
>
> I *did* to a portupgrade -rf gettext. But you may be on the right
> track regardless. There w
On Monday 05 April 2004 01:36 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Monday 05 April 2004 11:27 am, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> > After doing a portupgrade -rf gettext...
> >
> > I went back to trying to install the apsfilter port. It would drop
> > into /print/teTeX and /print/html2ps-letter and stop again with
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:27:50PM -0400, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> After doing a portupgrade -rf gettext...
>
> I went back to trying to install the apsfilter port. It would drop into
> /print/teTeX and /print/html2ps-letter and stop again with the
> libintl.so.5 not found error.
Something on your
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:36:42 -0700
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|O|>No, it means you didn't do a
|O|>portupgrade -rf gettext
I *did* to a portupgrade -rf gettext. But you may be on the right
track regardless. There was one port skipped, /x11/kdelibs3. I have read
lots to do with the p
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:27 am, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> After doing a portupgrade -rf gettext...
>
> I went back to trying to install the apsfilter port. It would drop
> into /print/teTeX and /print/html2ps-letter and stop again with the
> libintl.so.5 not found error.
>
> If I build apsfilter wi
After doing a portupgrade -rf gettext...
I went back to trying to install the apsfilter port. It would drop into
/print/teTeX and /print/html2ps-letter and stop again with the
libintl.so.5 not found error.
If I build apsfilter without select HTML (which no longer makes it want
teTeX and html2ps-l
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:22:46 +0100
Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|O|>libintl.so is provided by the devel/gettext port. Except that at the
|O|>moment it supplies libintl.so.6.
|O|># portupgrade -fr gettext
I could have sworn I've already done this. Probably did, but something
else
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:53:48AM -0400, Gerry Freymann wrote:
> How does one find out what port you need to install in order to get
>
> libintl.so.5 ?
libintl.so is provided by the devel/gettext port. Except that at the
moment it supplies libintl.so.6. If you hang around on this list for
lon
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:56:56 -0500
Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|O|>Thats an old problem check the -current list for a libmap.conf
|O|>discussion.
Awh, but isn't libmap.conf on FreeBSD v5+ (I'm running 4.9R).
I should also say that I still *don't* have Mozilla running but thank
goo
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libintl.so.5 not found and general ports question
How does one find out what port you need to install in order to get
libintl.so.5 ?
I've tried searching the online archives but can't find anything relevant.
I&#
How does one find out what port you need to install in order to get
libintl.so.5 ?
I've tried searching the online archives but can't find anything relevant.
I'm trying to get apsfilter installed and it complains that libintl.so.5
can't be found. I must have had it one time because it was instal
On Friday 06 February 2004 21:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Ok
thanks
> jens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi folks,
> > I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag
> > tag=.
> >
> > I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag
> > value to
> > RELE
jens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi folks,
> I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag
> tag=.
>
> I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag
> value to
> RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
> or
> RELENG_5
> or
> RELENG_5_2
Quoted from some of the e
On Friday 06 February 2004 10:32 am, jens wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag
> tag=.
>
> I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the
> tag value to
> RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
> or
> RELENG_5
> or
> RELENG_5_2
>
> in order to g
Hi folks,
I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag
tag=.
I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag
value to
RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE
or
RELENG_5
or
RELENG_5_2
in order to get the ports updating. I followed the instructions of the bsd
manu
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 07:21:56AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:44:19PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Well, to answer my own posting, I hacked the
> > /distfile and removed the "(SIZE) =" line.
> > Now openldap21-* is flowing across.
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:44:19PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> Well, to answer my own posting, I hacked the
> /distfile and removed the "(SIZE) =" line.
> Now openldap21-* is flowing across. Dunno
> why the port assumed the file or parts of i
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:12:47PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:23:33AM +1100, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:42:24 -0800
> > Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > People,
> > >
> > > Since I managed to upgrade this system's po
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:23:33AM +1100, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:42:24 -0800
> Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > People,
> >
> > Since I managed to upgrade this system's ports tree,
> > I keep things up to date. Recently, been having trou
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:42:24 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> People,
>
> Since I managed to upgrade this system's ports tree,
> I keep things up to date. Recently, been having trouble
> fetching some ports. openldap is one such. Upgrading
> or try
Ahh, I see. Sorry, I guess I misunderstood. I can't really come up with
something 123 then, I'm afraid.
Cheers,
Jorn.
PS: Thanks, I hope it'll become active one day. And my name is Jorn, not
John, but that's all right, no worries :-)
On Sunday 01 February 2004 22:55, you wrote:
> On Sun, Feb
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:46:48PM +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote:
> Why don't you use cvsup to sync your ports-tree? That's allot easier. Some
> ports aren't working now since the distfile isn't in sync with the make-file.
> If you use cvsup it will be solved.
>
Hi John,
I guess my
Why don't you use cvsup to sync your ports-tree? That's allot easier. Some
ports aren't working now since the distfile isn't in sync with the make-file.
If you use cvsup it will be solved.
Cheers,
Jorn
On Sunday 01 February 2004 22:42, Gary Kline wrote:
> People,
>
> Since I manage
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
