On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:16:40PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:42:00PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> >>On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:18:55AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
> >
> There's a wiki devoted to FreeBSD on Asus eee
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/AsusEee
>
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:53:37PM -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2009/6/21 Gary Kline :
>
> > anyway, i see only wireless, and i'm cat5 only. i've got a
> > 13-yr-old people here who would love for me to go wireless so
> > said people could take her apple macbook into her
Gary Kline wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:42:00PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:18:55AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
i have another issue that has more to do with freebsd on the new and
lost cost notebook computers i had heard of. how many and which ones
work best with ou
2009/6/21 Gary Kline :
> anyway, i see only wireless, and i'm cat5 only. i've got a
> 13-yr-old people here who would love for me to go wireless so
> said people could take her apple macbook into her bedroom and so
> on. well, said people need to be not hiding-in-room
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:42:00PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:18:55AM -1000, Al Plant wrote:
> > >i have another issue that has more to do with freebsd on the new and
> > >lost cost notebook computers i had heard of. how many and which ones
> > >work best with our flav
On Thursday 01 May 2008 20:41:49 alexus wrote:
> sorry, this is amd64
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Mario Lobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 May 2008 18:43:17 alexus wrote:
> > >> why are you compiling under i386 when your system is
> > >> detected as amd64 or ia64 ?
> >
> > Y
sorry, this is amd64
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Mario Lobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008 18:43:17 alexus wrote:
> >> why are you compiling under i386 when your system is
> >> detected as amd64 or ia64 ?
>
> You didn't answer this one.
>
> uname -a can help.
> --
> Mar
On Thursday 01 May 2008 18:43:17 alexus wrote:
>> why are you compiling under i386 when your system is
>> detected as amd64 or ia64 ?
You didn't answer this one.
uname -a can help.
--
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winedows F
On Thursday 01 May 2008 23:43:17 alexus wrote:
> like i said i copy GENERIC
>
> dd# pwd
> /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
> dd# grep -i acpi GENERIC
> dd#
>
> my GENERIC doesn't have acpi either...
>
> as far as "weird" part goes, this is a plain vanila
> FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE, I'm not sure what you mean by "
md64
> > rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS
> > ===> acpi (cleandepend)
> > ===> acpi/acpi (cleandepend)
> > "Makefile", line 4: "ACPI can only be compiled into the kernel on the
> > amd64 and ia64 platforms"
> > *** Error code 1
&
leandepend)
> rm -f @ machine amd64
> rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS
> ===> acpi (cleandepend)
> ===> acpi/acpi (cleandepend)
> "Makefile", line 4: "ACPI can only be compiled into the kernel on the
> amd64 and ia64 platforms"
> *** Error code 1
GTAGS
> ===> accf_http (cleandepend)
> rm -f @ machine amd64
> rm -f .depend GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS
> ===> acpi (cleandepend)
> ===> acpi/acpi (cleandepend)
> "Makefile", line 4: "ACPI can only be compiled into the kernel on the
> amd64 and ia64
(cleandepend)
"Makefile", line 4: "ACPI can only be compiled into the kernel on the
amd64 and ia64 platforms"
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/dd.
dd#
I
On 2007-12-04 11:33, "Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> __dead2 is a custom gcc modification. It just means the function
> doesn't return IIRC.
There's still a fair amount of work to make the source tree buildable on
non-FreeBSD platforms. One o
Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
> Hi Giorgos,
> The build failed for me 'with a syntax error before "__dead2" '.
> Are there any special include files I am supposed to have?
> I had trouble with the autoconf version I had installed and had to
> upgrade to the latest.
> Then I was able
pe-reqs
before I can build it.
Thanks,
Sarvi
-Original Message-
From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 3:02 AM
To: Micha?l Gr?newald
Cc: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi); freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD mak
a script that downloads pmake source from
> your favorite FreeBSD's mirror and builds a binary that worked on (at
> least one workstation running) Linux.
Since there seems to be so much interest in running FreeBSD
make(1) on other platforms, I've committed what I have done so
f
Bill Moran wrote:
Windows users love Windows at first, then grow to hate it.
BSD users hate FreeBSD at first, but grow to love it.
Windows is a luxury car with all the electric devices and trim.
And it's all shoddy and breaks in a few months.
Unix is a Land Rover with NOTHING fitted. But everythin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks guys. And I most certainly will enjoy FreeBSD as Microsoft windows
> is really starting to get to me >:|
Acutally, you probably won't enjoy it at first.
My experience:
Windows users love Windows at first, then grow to hate it.
BSD users hate FreeBSD at first,
Thanks guys. And I most certainly will enjoy FreeBSD as Microsoft windows
is really starting to get to me >:|
Regards,
Jimmy
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
An athlon XP is i386.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Platforms
Dear FreeBSD staff member,
I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by
the following
Hi Jimmy,
Dear FreeBSD staff member,
This is a public mailing list. :-)
I am currently
employing an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ as a processor so I have no idea how to proceed. What
platform should I use for the processor I am using?
Get the i386 version.
Your closest ftp-mirror is probably:
ftp://ftp.nl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by the following
statement:
"operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon), amd64 compatible
(including Opteron, Athlon 64"
And when I look to the left in the menu, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD staff member,
>
> I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by
> the following
> statement:
>
> "operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon),
> amd64 compatible
> (inc
Dear FreeBSD staff member,
I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by the
following
statement:
"operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon), amd64 compatible
(including Opteron, Athlon 64"
And when I look to the left in the men
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there. I have a question or two if you folks don't mind. I would
> like to migrate to a better, more stable OS for surfing, making
> music and data cd's as well as dvd's, and importing images ( vhs and
> photo) to cd/dvd. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing that
>
"reddevil69" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there. I have a question or two if you folks don't mind. I would like to
> migrate to a better, more stable OS for surfing, making music and data cd's as
> well as dvd's, and importing images ( vhs and photo) to cd/dvd. As far as
> I'm concerned, the
Hi there. I have a question or two if you folks don't mind. I would like to migrate to
a better, more stable OS for surfing, making music and data cd's as well as dvd's,
and importing images ( vhs and photo) to cd/dvd. As far as I'm concerned, the only
thing that Windows is good for is my game
28 matches
Mail list logo
