On 10/13/05, David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/13/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't see a single reason why I shouldn't ask
> > the BSD daemon to flame the hell out of you :-)
> >
> > Try again to verify. And again. Again then. And
> > if you think that 5 times ar
On 10/13/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see a single reason why I shouldn't ask
> the BSD daemon to flame the hell out of you :-)
>
> Try again to verify. And again. Again then. And
> if you think that 5 times are enough, you might
> be right. But they are not enough for you.
Y
On 10/13/05, David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/12/05, David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/12/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That's just not true. Cvsupping to something like
> > > RELENG_5_4 will do exactly the same thing as
> > > a patch, only it's t
On 10/12/05, David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/12/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's just not true. Cvsupping to something like
> > RELENG_5_4 will do exactly the same thing as
> > a patch, only it's the hassle-free way. You see
> > a sec-advisory, you type "cvsup -
On 10/12/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's just not true. Cvsupping to something like
> RELENG_5_4 will do exactly the same thing as
> a patch, only it's the hassle-free way. You see
> a sec-advisory, you type "cvsup -g -L 2 mysup"
> recompile what's suggested in the advisory, or
>
On 10/12/05, David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/12/05, Cody Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the response. I did a terrible job of asking the correct
> > question to get the response I wanted. I do know to cvsup the source
> > and build/make world. I currently ha
On 10/12/05, Cody Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I did a terrible job of asking the correct
> question to get the response I wanted. I do know to cvsup the source
> and build/make world. I currently have 4 FreeBSD servers in production
> serving various tasks. Th
On 10/12/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If things are not too tight on your hard drive, consider the cvsup
> > way. It's very easy - and very clearly described in the handbook.
>
> I've seen many people say this, but I suspect they haven't
> tried looking for information on patchin
On 10/12/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If things are not too tight on yout hard drive,
> consider the cvsup way. It's very easy - and
> very clearly described in the handbook.
I've seen many people say this, but I suspect they haven't tried
looking for information on patching using cv
On 10/12/05, Cody Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still pretty new to the BSD world and wanted to throw out a question
> to see what kind of responses I get. What is everyones take on what to
> do when security vulnerabities are discovered. Do you upgrade your
> source (not always the ea
On 10/12/05, Cody Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still pretty new to the BSD world and wanted to throw out a question
> to see what kind of responses I get. What is everyones take on what to
> do when security vulnerabities are discovered. Do you upgrade your
> source (not always the ea
I'm still pretty new to the BSD world and wanted to throw out a question
to see what kind of responses I get. What is everyones take on what to
do when security vulnerabities are discovered. Do you upgrade your
source (not always the easiest thing to do) or patch. What are the pros
and cons of p
12 matches
Mail list logo
