oops! replied to poster, forwarding to list as it worked.
Chris
Original Message
Subject: Re: Package Database Corruption
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:56:31 -0500
From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Referen
I have some package corruption and have had no luck fixing the problem.
I have tried pkgdb -f, tried to remove and reinstall, and any other idea
that I could find.
Can anyone offer some suggestions on this problem?
Here are some of the problem packages.
I even tried a force and rebuild all pack
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:36 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:44:05PM -0400, dave wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've got a 5.4 box, that was working fine until it somehow lost
>> it's correct date. A port upgrade was atempted while in this state
>> then when it failed, it was hande
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:44:05PM -0400, dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a 5.4 box, that was working fine until it somehow lost it's
> correct date. A port upgrade was atempted while in this state then when it
> failed, it was handed off to me to fix. THe problem is in the f-prot-sig
> package
Hello,
I've got a 5.4 box, that was working fine until it somehow lost it's
correct date. A port upgrade was atempted while in this state then when it
failed, it was handed off to me to fix. THe problem is in the f-prot-sig
package, it's not updating it's either wanting v 20050705 or 20050730 i
Hello. A friend of mine is running 5.1-REL and has somehow managed to get
some serious corruption on her package database. It's more than I've come
across before so I wanted to find out the easiest way to clean this up.
The way things stand now, she gets lots of stale dependency errors when
doing
