Many mails from me here today. Sorry about that. Having more problems than
skills I guess...
I have upgraded to imap-uw-2004g_1,1 and now my users can't log into the
server using pop3.
Every time I try to log in from Ie. Eudora on my Windows box the ipop3 core
dumps on the server.
telnet my.dom
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:40:33PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> John wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> >>I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server
> >>that can do APOP and TLS on port 110.
> >>
> >>Qpop
John wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server
that can do APOP and TLS on port 110.
Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing with
maildirs)...
Is there any other option?
Qpopper
John wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server
that can do APOP and TLS on port 110.
Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing
with maildirs)...
Is there any other option?
Qpopper
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server
> that can do APOP and TLS on port 110.
>
> Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing
> with maildirs)...
>
> Is there any other
I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server
that can do APOP and TLS on port 110.
Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing
with maildirs)...
Is there any other option?
Qpopper worked with some of the clients (like eudora) but then had
issues with
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:11:47AM -0700 or thereabouts, Richard Marriner wrote:
> Gary wrote:
> > I would say, give it a go... on high volume servers, the focal area of
> > concern is disk I/O, as this will be your slowest area.
> Thank you for your suggestion. I will for sure give it a try..
Gary wrote:
> I would say, give it a go... on high volume servers, the focal area of
> concern is disk I/O, as this will be your slowest area.
Thank you for your suggestion. I will for sure give it a try..
Richard Marriner II - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SYIX.COM - Internet Systems Specialist
_
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:28:31PM -0700 or thereabouts, Richard Marriner wrote:
>I am not sure of where to ask this question, but I have just recently
> finished configuring Postfix:Virtual:SMTPAUTH+MySQL+TeaPOP and it works
> great. Fortunatly (maybe unfortunately) it is on a test server.
Dear List,
I am not sure of where to ask this question, but I have just recently
finished configuring Postfix:Virtual:SMTPAUTH+MySQL+TeaPOP and it works
great. Fortunatly (maybe unfortunately) it is on a test server. Our main
mail server (which we are planning to implement this technology to)
"fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does FBSD have an built in preconfigured pop3 server?
> A pop3 server that's part of the FBSD basic install?
No.
> I know qpopper is in the ports.
And many others as well.
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking
f> Does FBSD have an built in preconfigured pop3 server?
f> A pop3 server that's part of the FBSD basic install?
f> I know qpopper is in the ports.
courier-imap has both POP3 and IMAP servers I think.
f> Thanks
f> ___
f> [EMAIL
Does FBSD have an built in preconfigured pop3 server?
A pop3 server that's part of the FBSD basic install?
I know qpopper is in the ports.
Thanks
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:40:23AM -0700 or thereabouts, Naveen Glore wrote:
> Gary, thankyou for all the information. I will start working on setting up the mail
> server.
You are welcome. Once you get the hang of it, you will appreciate its
simplicity. It's the concept that has to sink in
Hello,
Gary, thankyou for all the information. I will start working on setting up the mail
server.
Thanks,
Naveen
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Naveen,
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:42:00 PM -0700 Naveen Glore
wrote:
> In mailserver I think the messages will be stored in var/mai
Hi Naveen,
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:42:00 PM -0700 Naveen Glore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In mailserver I think the messages will be stored in var/mail/accountname
(correct me if i am wrong). I have very less disk space for /var. This
was not a concern with POP3 because messages get
> Hello,
> I will start going through lifewithqmail.org. Would like to clear few more
> things:
> In mailserver I think the messages will be stored in var/mail/accountname
> (correct me if i am wrong). I have very less disk space for /var. This was
> not a concern with POP3 because messages get del
Hello,
I will start going through lifewithqmail.org. Would like to clear few more things:
In mailserver I think the messages will be stored in var/mail/accountname (correct me
if i am wrong). I have very less disk space for /var. This was not a concern with POP3
because messages get deleted from
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:26:06AM -0700 or thereabouts, Chris Pressey wrote:
> Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, I was referring to running a MUA that does not use the
> > Sendmail switch automatically, as Mutt would use, but something like
> > KMail, or whatever, which requires one
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:18:54 -0500
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
Hey :)
> [...]
> --On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:03:33 AM -0700 Chris Pressey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Er - you mean running two different MTA's on different interfaces on
> > the same machine? Sure, I g
Hi Chris,
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:03:33 AM -0700 Chris Pressey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since qmail has a sendmail wrapper to begin with, as noted above, and
it is put in as a replacement (marking the original to sendmail.old),
in/usr/lib/sendmail, and /usr/sbin/sendmail why would
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:29:32 -0500
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:02:22AM -0700 or thereabouts, Chris Pressey
> wrote:
> > ...except for some FreeBSD-specific info :)
> >
> > Here are some tips:
> >
> > 1) FreeBSD uses a "MTA wrapper" which makes your mailer *look*
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Naveen Glore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I have FreeBSD 4.5 version in my server. Now if i install qmail from
> the ports, i guess it will install the latest version and do you think
> i will have some kind of problem with it. Do i need to u
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:02:22AM -0700 or thereabouts, Chris Pressey wrote:
> ...except for some FreeBSD-specific info :)
>
> Here are some tips:
>
> 1) FreeBSD uses a "MTA wrapper" which makes your mailer *look* like
> sendmail, regardless of what your mailer actually is. This wrapper is
> lo
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:20:41 -0500
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
> --On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 08:08:17 AM -0700 Naveen Glore
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I understand that qmail is very secured than sendmail. Since these
> > two are completly different fr
Hi Naveen,
--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 08:08:17 AM -0700 Naveen Glore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I understand that qmail is very secured than sendmail. Since these two
are completly different from each other, is it difficult to change from
sendmail to qmail? i would really appreciate
Hello,
I understand that qmail is very secured than sendmail. Since these two are completly
different from each other, is it difficult to change from sendmail to qmail? i would
really appreciate if you could tell me where i can find proper documentation for it. I
need documentation which explain
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 04:54:59PM -0700 or thereabouts, Chris Pressey wrote:
> Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I choose qmail. BTW, I build them from source, not from the ports...
> > The ports seem to have several patches in there which most people do
> > not need.
> FYI, I think the patch
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:44:31 -0500
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I build mail servers for others, I choose qmail. BTW, I build
> them from source, not from the ports... The ports seem to have several
> patches in there which most people do not need.
FYI, I think the patches you are refer
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 02:23:13PM -0700 or thereabouts, Naveen Glore wrote:
> Currently I am using sendmail MTA. I heard that sendmail is not very
> secured. Do i need to switch to qmail before going for IMAP?
Now you are opening up a can of worms Like the VI versus emacs war,
which is better.
Currently I am using POP3 server with MS outlook
> as mail client. I would like to change POP3 to IMAP so that i can have a
> centralized email system.
They are two separate protocols. What you need is an IMAP server. You
can leave your POP server on too if you wish. You can have both.
--On Monday, September 29, 2003 01:25:46 PM -0700 Naveen Glore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a freeBSD server. Currently I am using POP3 server with MS outlook
as mail client. I would like to change POP3 to IMAP so that i can have a
centralized email system.
They are two separate pro
.
HTH,
C. Kulish
> Hello all,
> I have a freeBSD server. Currently I am using POP3 server with MS outlook
> as mail client. I would like to change POP3 to IMAP so that i can have a
> centralized email system. Could anyone suggest me some good documentation
> for converting POP3 to IMAP
Hello all,
I have a freeBSD server. Currently I am using POP3 server with MS outlook as mail
client. I would like to change POP3 to IMAP so that i can have a centralized email
system. Could anyone suggest me some good documentation for converting POP3 to IMAP.
Please let me know if there are
ekrem _ wrote:
[...]
I'd like to be able to delete my emails from my ISP's POP3 server,
especially to avoid
the recent bombardment of the W32.swen.A virus which come with a
150kb+ attachment.
So I'm looking for such a filter or spam detector which will delete
from spam direct
From: David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ekrem _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Deleting/Filtering mail from POP3 server before its download?
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:20:13 +0200
ekrem _ wrote:
Hi people,
I'd like to be able to delete my emails f
ekrem _ wrote:
Hi people,
I'd like to be able to delete my emails from my ISP's POP3 server,
especially to avoid
the recent bombardment of the W32.swen.A virus which come with a 150kb+
attachment.
So I'm looking for such a filter or spam detector which will delete from
spam di
Hi people,
I'd like to be able to delete my emails from my ISP's POP3 server,
especially to avoid
the recent bombardment of the W32.swen.A virus which come with a 150kb+
attachment.
So I'm looking for such a filter or spam detector which will delete from
spam directly from
I use squrrelmail and uw-imap. I can use pop3 and imap without any problems.
Alfonso Romero
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Widerøe Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:16 AM
Subject: IMAP stealing mails from POP
ith it. However, when I try to download
it later with my POP3 account it's not there... but it's in Squirrelmail!
My guess is that IMAP steals it from my POP3 server. The first server to
open an email gets it. Is this correct?
How can I use both Squirrelmail with IMAP (which it requi
40 matches
Mail list logo
