On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:21:31 +, Da Rock wrote:
>> Can you show us the *exact* deferral message?
>>
>> It may be greylisting from the FreeBSD.org mail servers.
>
> Ok. This is the exact message:
>
> Apr 11 16:26:40 postfix/smtp[1325]:
> 488851744F: to=,
> relay=mx1.freebsd.org[69.147.8
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:57:36AM +, Da Rock wrote:
[...]
>
> I thought it sounded like dns too. But I was under the impression that only a
> reverse lookup was used against the Server name sent by postfix. I have
> specifically requested a ptr record in the arpa zone, and I can run a
> re
> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:42:31 +0700
> From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
> To: rock_on_the_...@hotmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: OT: Postfix rejects from Freebsd server
>
> > Apr 11 16:26:40 postfix/smtp[1325]:
> > 488851744F: to=,
> >
Da Rock wrote:
> If I resolveip for my ip address it shows up my mail server name, and
> YET I still get deferred rejection from the freebsd mx's.
I had this problem before - freebsd mail server needs some time before
it sees DNS changes...will be fine in a few hours.
Peter
__
> Apr 11 16:26:40 postfix/smtp[1325]:
> 488851744F: to=,
> relay=mx1.freebsd.org[69.147.83.52]:25, delay=100211,
> delays=100114/49/48/0.35, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred (host
> mx1.freebsd.org[69.147.83.52] said: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected:
> cannot find your hostname, [] (in reply to RCPT TO c
> From: keram...@ceid.upatras.gr
> To: rock_on_the_...@hotmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: OT: Postfix rejects from Freebsd server
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:08:19 +0300
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:31:22 +, Da Rock
> wrote:
> >
> From: keram...@ceid.upatras.gr
> To: rock_on_the_...@hotmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: OT: Postfix rejects from Freebsd server
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:08:19 +0300
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:31:22 +, Da Rock
> wrote:
> >
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:31:22 +, Da Rock wrote:
> I know this may be OT, but I could use some help on this one. I've
> completed a major changeover in network provider, and I've now got a
> proper static ip including ptr records for my mail server (the only
> service that really counts on this
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:31:22AM +, Da Rock wrote:
>
> I know this may be OT, but I could use some help on this one. I've
> completed a major changeover in network provider, and I've now got a
> proper static ip including ptr records for my mail server (the only
> service that really counts
I know this may be OT, but I could use some help on this one. I've
completed a major changeover in network provider, and I've now got a
proper static ip including ptr records for my mail server (the only
service that really counts on this anyway).
If I resolveip for my ip address it shows up my m
10 matches
Mail list logo
