On 02/08/06, N. Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool! Can you share with me what sort of settings you
use on your boxes? sysctl/kerneltunes/mount options?
This may be a disappointment to you but... I didn't have to do anything :-(
All I have is rw on the client.
It has taken me a over
--- Freminlins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicole,
>
> On 02/08/06, N. Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > I have several web servers that are attached to a
> > Netapp (network appliance) unit via NFS-3. A few
> > servers are 5.5 and a few are 6.1 for comparison
> > testing. Al
Nicole,
On 02/08/06, N. Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have several web servers that are attached to a
Netapp (network appliance) unit via NFS-3. A few
servers are 5.5 and a few are 6.1 for comparison
testing. All seem to have lousy performance.
We have a similar setup and it run
--- Jeremy Kister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/2006 11:05 PM, N. Harrington wrote:
> > My current mount options are:
> > filer:/vol/fvol31/home/13/13 nfs
> > ro,noatime,-r=32768,-T,-b,-R0,-i,-D2,-L 0 0
>
> for the same performance reason, mine is:
> netapp1:/vol/vol0/export /export
On 8/1/2006 11:05 PM, N. Harrington wrote:
My current mount options are:
filer:/vol/fvol31/home/13/13 nfs
ro,noatime,-r=32768,-T,-b,-R0,-i,-D2,-L 0 0
for the same performance reason, mine is:
netapp1:/vol/vol0/export /export nfs rw,-r=16384,-w=16384,-L 0 0
might be worth a try
Hi
I have several web servers that are attached to a
Netapp (network appliance) unit via NFS-3. A few
servers are 5.5 and a few are 6.1 for comparison
testing. All seem to have lousy performance. When
going through the issues with Netapp, the reasons
given were that we have too many GettAdr/Looku
