Re: NO_PROFILE versus WITHOUT_PROFILING

2009-11-27 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Friday 27 November 2009 12:44:55 pm Michael Powell wrote: > Pieter de Goeje wrote: > > On Friday 27 November 2009 12:45:54 Frank Staals wrote: > >> When I was setting up my system for a complete rebuild I came > >> across something unclear to me; I always used NO_PROFILE in my > >> make.conf, ho

Re: NO_PROFILE versus WITHOUT_PROFILING

2009-11-27 Thread Michael Powell
Pieter de Goeje wrote: > On Friday 27 November 2009 12:45:54 Frank Staals wrote: >> When I was setting up my system for a complete rebuild I came across >> something unclear to me; I always used NO_PROFILE in my make.conf, >> however from what I've read specific make options to build the >> kerne

Re: NO_PROFILE versus WITHOUT_PROFILING

2009-11-27 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Friday 27 November 2009 12:45:54 Frank Staals wrote: > When I was setting up my system for a complete rebuild I came across > something unclear to me; I always used NO_PROFILE in my make.conf, > however from what I've read specific make options to build the > kernel/base system should be in /et

NO_PROFILE versus WITHOUT_PROFILING

2009-11-27 Thread Frank Staals
When I was setting up my system for a complete rebuild I came across something unclear to me; I always used NO_PROFILE in my make.conf, however from what I've read specific make options to build the kernel/base system should be in /etc/src.config. The manpage of src.conf specifies the option W