in message <4fd0adfb.8030...@tundraware.com>,
wrote Tim Daneliuk thusly...
>
> On 06/07/2012 12:19 AM, Parv wrote:
> > in message<4fcf48af@tundraware.com>,
> > wrote Tim Daneliuk thusly...
> >>
> > ...
> >> Within a makefile, I need to assign the name of a program as
> >> in:
> >>
> >> FOO = "b
On 06/07/2012 12:19 AM, Parv wrote:
in message<4fcf48af@tundraware.com>,
wrote Tim Daneliuk thusly...
...
Within a makefile, I need to assign the name of a program as in:
FOO = "bar".
The problem is that 'bar' may also be know as, say, "bar.sh".
...
Is there a simple way to determine
in message <4fcf48af@tundraware.com>,
wrote Tim Daneliuk thusly...
>
...
> Within a makefile, I need to assign the name of a program as in:
>
> FOO = "bar".
>
> The problem is that 'bar' may also be know as, say, "bar.sh".
...
> Is there a simple way to determine which form "bar" or "bar.sh" on
Not strictly FBSD, but ...
Within a makefile, I need to assign the name of a program as in:
FOO = "bar".
The problem is that 'bar' may also be know as, say, "bar.sh". Worse still
both "bar" and "bar.sh" can exist with one linked to the other. Is there
a simple way to determine which form "bar
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:09:51 +0100 (BST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In Mplayers makefile it says 'Wants Gnome' - does this mean that
> making it would drag in all the gnome libs etc ?
No it doesn't. It's more a matter co-ordinating with gnome.
___
free
In Mplayers makefile it says 'Wants Gnome' - does this mean that making it
would drag in all the gnome libs etc ? I was hoping for a text / cli mode
dvd player would work under X ? Also, does anyone know of a FreeBSd
version of MyBashBurn ? Thanks !
___
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:38:49AM +0100, VeeJay wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is it possible to make configuration changes in Makefile to install a port
> as per one's requirments?
It is possible. But it is better to avoid as it gets overwritten when you cvsup
or portsnap.
>
> I want to accomplish t
Thanks
Where can I make above mentioned required changes... can you please give me
a little hint... since I am novice to Unix
Thanks...
VJ
On 12/6/06, VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
Is it possible to make configuration changes in Makefile to install a port
as per one's requi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VeeJay
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2006 8:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-Questions
> Subject: Makefile question... please help...
>
>
Yes, you can.
Hi there,
Is it possible to make configuration changes in Makefile to install a port
as per one's requirments?
I want to accomplish two tasks
1. I want to configure mysql port before installation with following
parameters: Could someone tell me that where in the Makefile, I need to put
thes
If somebody is interested in this topic, I've found a good workaround:
redefining do-comfigure in such way:
do-configure:
cd ${WRKSRC} && ./configure --prefix=${PREFIX}/appname
And it works fine now.
Cheers,
Gábor Kövesdán
___
freebsd-questions@f
Yes, it worked when I specified it by hand. But Johnny has found out
what was the problem. The bsd.port.mk file
overrides the prefix, thus I had to specify my CONFIGURE_ARGS after the
include line.
Cheers,
Gábor Kövesdán
Dan Nelson wrote:
Yes, that should have worked. Does it do what you w
In the last episode (Jun 13), Dan Nelson said:
> In the last episode (Jun 13):
> > Oh, I didn't mean that. Both the configure script and the application
> > Makefile are working. What I mean is,
> > that the configure script doesn't let me to specify --libdir, --bindir, ...
> > Thus a lot of files
In the last episode (Jun 13):
> Oh, I didn't mean that. Both the configure script and the application
> Makefile are working. What I mean is,
> that the configure script doesn't let me to specify --libdir, --bindir, ...
> Thus a lot of files would be installed directly under the default
> ${PREFI
You misunderstood what I want. As I mentioned the configure script is
awkward and I can't specify
--bindir, --libdir, everything goes to the specified --prefix. Thus
I won't have any subdirectories in
/usr/local/appname, just an executable and some sample config and doc.
Vasil Dimov wrote:
Oh, I didn't mean that. Both the configure script and the application
Makefile are working. What I mean is,
that the configure script doesn't let me to specify --libdir, --bindir, ...
Thus a lot of files would be installed directly under the default
${PREFIX}, which is /usr/local, that's why I
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:24:37PM +0200, Kvesdn Gbor wrote:
...
> then every file goes to directly to /usr/local not to /usr/local/bin,
> /usr/local/etc, ...
> Thus I would like to install it into /usr/local/appname.
...
Who will find executables located in /usr/local/appname/bin/ ?
In the last episode (Jun 13), Gábor Kövesdán said:
> I'm trying to make a new port, but the software I'm porting has an
> awkward configure script, and when I run ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
> then every file goes to directly to /usr/local not to /usr/local/bin,
> /usr/local/etc, ...
Maybe
Hello,
I'm trying to make a new port, but the software I'm porting has an
awkward configure script, and when I run ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
then every file goes to directly to /usr/local not to /usr/local/bin,
/usr/local/etc, ...
Thus I would like to install it into /usr/local/appname.
19 matches
Mail list logo
