Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-19 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 8/19/05, Jerahmy Pocott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20/08/2005, at 11:34 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > > > You can keep a windows 2000 system secure without patching!: > > > > * Uninstall Outlook Express and IE ( http://www.litepc.com/ ), Install > > Firefox and Thunderbird. > > * Instal

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-19 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
On 20/08/2005, at 11:34 AM, Nikolas Britton wrote: You can keep a windows 2000 system secure without patching!: * Uninstall Outlook Express and IE ( http://www.litepc.com/ ), Install Firefox and Thunderbird. * Install Perl, Uninstall WSH. * Hardware (m0n0wall) and software (stealth mode, deny

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-19 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 8/11/05, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:09 pm, Matt Kosht wrote: > > >On 8/11/05, Peter Giessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are uptimes greater than 4 years listed here: > > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > > > A Windows 2

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Missing patches?, Most people I know can apply patches with out rebooting > a FreeBSD. > FreeBSD-SA-05:19.ipsec FreeBSD-SA-05:17.devfs FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcp FreeBSD-SA-05:13.ipfw FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt [REVISED] FreeBSD-SA-05:08.kmem [REVISED] FreeBSD-SA-05:07.ldt FreeBSD-S

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread estover
SA-05:14.bzip2.asc. > That's DOS, that kind of attack is serious enough for me to try to avoid. > > Or someone gains root privileges via the vulnerability described in > FreeBSD-SA-05:16.zlib, FreeBSD-SA-05:17.devfs or FreeBSD-SA-05:18.zlib. > > I mean it's great FreeBSD

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread Kent Stewart
On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:09 pm, Matt Kosht wrote: > >On 8/11/05, Peter Giessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are uptimes greater than 4 years listed here: > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > A Windows 2000 server with over 1000 days of uptime. Whoever hacked > it mu

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread lars
gains root privileges via the vulnerability described in FreeBSD-SA-05:16.zlib, FreeBSD-SA-05:17.devfs or FreeBSD-SA-05:18.zlib. I mean it's great FreeBSD can sustain such a long uptime. But, IMHO, it's nothing to brag about, since it simultaneously indicates missing patches, which I find worse.

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread Matt Kosht
>On 8/11/05, Peter Giessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are uptimes greater than 4 years listed here: > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html A Windows 2000 server with over 1000 days of uptime. Whoever hacked it must be doing a good job as sysadmin ;) ___

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Giessel
There are uptimes greater than 4 years listed here: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread Dmitry Mityugov
On 8/11/05, Bob Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/11/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Nice, I to have a machine that is not to far behind you, its been up for 1 > > year > > > and 4 months. > > > > > > I use it to show potential customers the power and

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread nawcom
hehe don't try and show off your uptime, im sure there are some people around here who will make it their lifetime goal to halt your server! :-P (that doesnt include me, im a nice guy) -Ben Bob Johnson wrote: On 8/11/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nic

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread Bob Johnson
On 8/11/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Nice, I to have a machine that is not to far behind you, its been up for 1 > year > > and 4 months. > > > > I use it to show potential customers the power and stability of the > FreeBSD > > System. I dont ever recall any wi

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nice, I to have a machine that is not to far behind you, its been up for 1 > year > and 4 months. > > I use it to show potential customers the power and stability of the FreeBSD > System. I dont ever recall any windows server staying up that long. =) > > -Pablo I could

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-11 Thread pablo . delgado
Nice, I to have a machine that is not to far behind you, its been up for 1 year and 4 months. I use it to show potential customers the power and stability of the FreeBSD System. I dont ever recall any windows server staying up that long. =) -Pablo > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-10 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Bob Bomar wrote: > I have a machine that is about to turn 700 days uptime, and I have no > plans on rebooting it any time soon. I just wanted to see if there was > any infomation from the machine that anybody wanted. Its IP address would be a good start :-) Two years of pa

Re: Long Uptime

2005-08-10 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Bob Bomar wrote: > I have a machine that is about to turn 700 days > uptime, and I have no plans on rebooting it any > time soon. I just wanted to see if there was > any infomation from the machine that anybody > wanted. Well, I think there are enough people around with nnn d

Long Uptime

2005-08-09 Thread Bob Bomar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a machine that is about to turn 700 days uptime, and I have no plans on rebooting it any time soon. I just wanted to see if there was any infomation from the machine that anybody wanted. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>uname -a FreeBSD bart. 4.8-RELE